ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Central and Eastern European (CEE) migrant workers in essential industries are at higher risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) exposure and transmission. We investigated the relationship of CEE migrant status and co-living situation with indicators of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and transmission risk (ETR), aiming to find entry points for policies to reduce health inequalities for migrant workers. METHODS: We included 563 SARS-CoV-2-positive workers between October 2020 and July 2021. Data on ETR indicators were obtained from source- and contact-tracing interviews via retrospective analysis of medical records. Associations of CEE migrant status and co-living situation with ETR indicators were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: CEE migrant status was not associated with occupational ETR but was with higher occupational-domestic exposure [odds ratio (OR) 2.92; P = 0.004], lower domestic exposure (OR 0.25, P < 0.001), lower community exposure (OR 0.41, P = 0.050) and transmission (OR 0.40, P = 0.032) and higher general transmission (OR 1.76, P = 0.004) risk. Co-living was not associated with occupational and community ETR but was with higher occupational-domestic exposure (OR 2.63, P = 0.032), higher domestic transmission (OR 17.12, P < 0.001) and lower general exposure (OR 0.34, P = 0.007) risk. CONCLUSIONS: The workfloor poses an equal SARS-CoV-2 ETR for all workers. CEE migrants encounter less ETR in their community but pose a general risk by delaying testing. When co-living, CEE migrants encounter more domestic ETR. Coronavirus disease preventive policies should aim at occupational safety for essential industry workers, reduction of test delay for CEE migrants and improvement of distancing options when co-living.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Transients and Migrants , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is a dearth of knowledge and understanding concerning hoarding by children and adolescents. Psychiatrists need to know more about the phenomenon of hoarding since it can be a marker of psychopathology and it sometimes is symptomatic of a psychiatric disorder. AIM: To review hoarding from an epidemiological and psychopathological perspective and to discuss it in relation to the developmental aspect of the first object acquisition: the transitional object. METHOD: We conducted a literature search in PubMed, Medline, PsycINFO and the Cochranedatabase using primarily the search term 'hoarding', but also in combination with the terms: primates, child, adolescent, psych*, klepto*, transitional object, obsessive-compulsive disorder, collecting and attachment. RESULTS: Both animals and humans engage frequently in collecting and hoarding. Up to 60% of normally functioning children and adolescents are involved in collecting. A strong emotional attachment to possessions may be a response to an attachment problem. Hoarding combined with psychopathology is seen in persons of all ages but the prevalence rates for children and adults are unknown. CONCLUSION: Hoarding is a worrisome type of behaviour which must be regarded as an indication of serious comorbid psychopathology. It can occur either as a symptom of an existing disorder or as a separate disorder. Finally we recommend that hoarding be included in the diagnostic criteria of the dsm and icd.
