ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Children with airway malacia often have protracted courses of airway infections, because dynamic airway collapse during coughing results in impaired mucociliary clearance. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of the mucolytic drug recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase) on the recovery of respiratory symptoms in children with airway malacia and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). METHODS: In a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial, 40 children with airway malacia and LRTI were randomly assigned to receive either 2.5 mg nebulized rhDNase or placebo twice daily for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in the cough diary score (CDS) (scale 0-5) from baseline to the second week of treatment. Secondary endpoints were VAS symptom scores for cough, dyspnea, and difficulty in expectorating sputum, need for an antibiotic course, and lung function data (FVC, FEV(1), FEF(75), R(int(e))). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean change in CDSs from baseline between the rhDNase group and the placebo group (mean difference for daytime 0.19 (95% CI -0.53 to 0.90); for nighttime 0.38 (95% CI -0.30 to 1.05). Proportions of patients requiring antibiotics, and the mean changes in symptom scores and lung function from baseline did not significantly differ between both groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 2 weeks of nebulized rhDNase does not enhance recovery or reduce the need for antibiotics in children with airway malacia and LRTI. (Controlled-trials.com number, ISRCTN85366144).
Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/drug therapy , Airway Obstruction/pathology , Bronchomalacia/complications , Deoxyribonuclease I/administration & dosage , Pneumonia/drug therapy , Respiratory Tract Infections/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Airway Obstruction/complications , Child , Child, Preschool , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Forced Expiratory Volume , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Pneumonia/complications , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Probability , Prospective Studies , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Respiratory Function Tests , Respiratory Tract Infections/complications , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Statistics, Nonparametric , Treatment Outcome , Vital CapacityABSTRACT
Mucoactive agents are used to treat a variety of lung diseases involving impaired mucociliary clearance or mucus hypersecretion. The mucoactive agents studied most frequently are N-acetylcysteine (NAC), recombinant human DNase (rhDNase), and hypertonic saline. Studies on the efficacy of these have been mainly conducted in adults, and in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The exact role of mucoactive agents in children with non-CF lung disease is not well established. We present an overview of the current literature reporting clinical outcome measures of treatment with NAC, rhDNase, and hypertonic saline in children.
Subject(s)
Expectorants/therapeutic use , Lung Diseases/drug therapy , Mucociliary Clearance/drug effects , Acetylcysteine/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Deoxyribonuclease I/therapeutic use , Humans , Infant , Lung Diseases/complications , Mucociliary Clearance/physiology , Physical Therapy Modalities , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Saline Solution, Hypertonic/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Treatment of hospitalized infants with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis is mainly supportive. Bronchodilators and systemic steroids are often used but do not reduce the length of hospital stay. Because hypoxia and airways obstruction develop secondary to viscous mucus in infants with RSV bronchiolitis, and because free DNA is present in RSV mucus, we tested the efficacy of the mucolytic drug recombinant human deoxyribonuclease (rhDNase). METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial, 225 oxygen-dependent infants admitted to the hospital for RSV bronchiolitis were randomly assigned to receive 2.5 mg bid of nebulized rhDNase or placebo until discharge. The primary end point was length of hospital stay. Secondary end points were duration of supplemental oxygen, improvement in symptom score, and number of intensive care admissions. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to the length of hospital stay (p = 0.19) or the duration of supplemental oxygen (p = 0.07). The ratio (rhDNase/placebo) of geometric means of length of stay was 1.12 (95% confidence interval, 0.96 to 1.33); for the duration of supplemental oxygen, the ratio was 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.68). There were no significant differences in the rate of improvement of the symptom score or in the number of intensive care admissions. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of rhDNase did not reduce the length of hospital stay or the duration of supplemental oxygen in oxygen-dependent infants with RSV bronchiolitis.
Subject(s)
Bronchiolitis/drug therapy , Deoxyribonuclease I/administration & dosage , Expectorants/administration & dosage , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/drug therapy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human , Administration, Inhalation , Double-Blind Method , Expectorants/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric , Length of Stay , Male , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Patient Admission , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human/drug effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Congenital airway malacia is one of the few causes of irreversible airways obstruction in children, but the incidence in the general population is unknown. Severe airway malacia or malacia associated with specific syndromes is usually recognized and diagnosed early in infancy, but information about clinical features of children with primary malacia, often diagnosed only later in childhood, is scarce. METHODS: We analyzed all flexible bronchoscopies performed between 1997 and 2004 in the Sophia Children's Hospital, summarized clinical features of children with primary airway malacia, estimated the incidence of primary airway malacia, and calculated the predictive value of a clinical diagnosis of airway malacia by pediatric pulmonologists. RESULTS: In a total of 512 bronchoscopies, airway malacia was diagnosed in 160 children (94 males) at a median age of 4.0 years (range, 0 to 17 years). Airway malacia was classified as primary in 136 children and secondary in 24 children. The incidence of primary airway malacia was estimated to be at least 1 in 2,100. When pediatric pulmonologists expected to find airway malacia (based on symptoms, history, and lung function) prior to bronchoscopy, this was correct in 74% of the cases. In 52% of the airway malacia diagnoses, the diagnosis was not suspected prior to bronchoscopy. Presenting clinical features of children with airway malacia were variable and atypical, showing considerable overlap with features of allergic asthma. Peak expiratory flow was more reduced than FEV(1). CONCLUSION: Primary airway malacia is not rare in the general population, with an estimated incidence of at least 1 in 2,100 children. Airway malacia is difficult to recognize based on clinical features that show overlap with those of more common pulmonary diseases. We recommend bronchoscopy in patients with impaired exercise tolerance, recurrent lower airways infection, and therapy-resistant, irreversible, and/or atypical asthma to rule out airway malacia.
