Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of developing bone mineral: from amorphous precursor to mature crystal.

Bone mineral development has been described to proceed through an amorphous precursor prior to apatite crystallization. However, further analytical approaches are necessary to identify specific markers of amorphous mineral components in bone. Here, we establish an original Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy approach to allow the specific identification of the amorphous and/or crystalline nature of bone mineral. Using a series of standards, our results demonstrate that obtaining the second derivative of the FTIR spectra could reveal a peak specifically corresponding to amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) at ∼992 cm-1. The intensity of this peak was strongly correlated to ACP content in standard mixtures. The analysis of a variety of bones showed that a clear ACP peak could be identified as a specific marker of the existence of an amorphous mineral component in developing bones. In contrast, the ACP peak was not detected in the mature bones. Moreover, subjecting developing bones to ex vivo crystallization conditions led to a clear reduction of the ACP peak, further substantiating the conversion of amorphous mineral precursor into mature apatite crystals. Analysis of mineralization in osteogenic cell cultures corroborated our observations, showing the presence of ACP as a major transient component in early mineralization, but not in the mature matrix. Additionally, FTIR imaging revealed that ACP was present in areas of matrix development, distributed around the edges of mineralizing nodules. Using an original analytical approach, this work provides strong evidence to support that bone mineral development is initiated by an amorphous precursor prior to apatite crystallization.

Matrix mineralization controls gene expression in osteoblastic cells.

Osteoblasts are adherent cells, and under physiological conditions they attach to both mineralized and non-mineralized osseous surfaces. However, how exactly osteoblasts respond to these different osseous surfaces is largely unknown. Our hypothesis was that the state of matrix mineralization provides a functional signal to osteoblasts. To assess the osteoblast response to mineralized compared to demineralized osseous surfaces, we developed and validated a novel tissue surface model. We demonstrated that with the exception of the absence of mineral, the mineralized and demineralized surfaces were similar in molecular composition as determined, for example, by collagen content and maturity. Subsequently, we used the human osteoblastic cell line MG63 in combination with genome-wide gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) to record and compare the gene expression signatures on mineralized and demineralized surfaces. Assessment of the 5 most significant gene sets showed on mineralized surfaces an enrichment exclusively of genes sets linked to protein synthesis, while on the demineralized surfaces 3 of the 5 enriched gene sets were associated with the matrix. Focusing on these three gene sets, we observed not only the expected structural components of the bone matrix, but also gene products, such as HMCN1 or NID2, that are likely to act as temporal migration guides. Together, these findings suggest that in osteoblasts mineralized and demineralized osseous surfaces favor intracellular protein production and matrix formation, respectively. Further, they demonstrate that the mineralization state of bone independently controls gene expression in osteoblastic cells.