The role of cell signaling in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis in the regulation of tumor cell survival in response to sorafenib and neratinib.

The molecular mechanisms by which tumor cells survive or die following therapeutic interventions are complex. There are three broadly defined categories of cell death processes: apoptosis (Type I), autophagic cell death (Type II), and necrosis (Type III). In hematopoietic tumor cells, the majority of toxic stimuli cause these cells to undergo a death process called apoptosis; apoptosis specifically involves the cleavage of DNA into large defined pieces and their subsequent localization in vesicles. Thus, 'pure' apoptosis largely lacks inflammatory potential. In carcinomas, however, the mechanisms by which tumor cells ultimately die are considerably more complex. Although the machinery of apoptosis is engaged by toxic stimuli, other processes such as autophagy ("self-eating") and replicative cell death can lead to observations that do not simplistically correspond to any of the individual Type I-III formalized death categories. The 'hybrid' forms of cell death observed in carcinoma cells result in cellular materials being released into the extracellular space without packaging, which promotes inflammation, potentially leading to the accelerated re-growth of surviving tumor cells by macrophages. Drugs as single agents or in combinations can simultaneously initiate signaling via both apoptotic and autophagic pathways. Based on the tumor type and its oncogene drivers, as well as the drug(s) being used and the duration and intensity of the autophagosome signal, apoptosis and autophagy have the potential to act in concert to kill or alternatively that the actions of either pathway can act to suppress signaling by the other pathway. And, there also is evidence that autophagic flux, by causing lysosomal protease activation, with their subsequent release into the cytosol, can directly mediate killing. This review will discuss the interactive biology between apoptosis and autophagy in carcinoma cells. Finally, the molecular actions of the FDA-approved drugs neratinib and sorafenib, and how they enhance both apoptotic and toxic autophagic processes, alone or in combination with other agents, is discussed in a bench-to-bedside manner.

The role of cell signalling in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis.

Not surprisingly, the death of a cell is a complex and well controlled process. For several decades, apoptosis, the first genetically programmed death process to be identified has taken centre stage as the principal mechanism of programmed cell death (type I cell death) in mammalian tissues. Apoptosis has been extensively studied and its contribution to the pathogenesis of disease well documented. However, apoptosis does not function alone in determining the fate of a cell. More recently, autophagy, a process in which de novo formed membrane enclosed vesicles engulf and consume cellular components, has been shown to engage in complex interplay with apoptosis. As a result, cell death has been subdivided into the categories apoptosis (Type I), autophagic cell death (Type II), and necrosis (Type III). The boundary between Type I and II cell death is not completely clear and as we will discuss in this review and perhaps a discrete difference does not exist, due to intrinsic factors among different cell types and crosstalk among organelles within each cell type. Apoptosis may begin with autophagy and autophagy can often end with apoptosis, inhibition or a blockade of caspase activity may lead a cell to default into Type II cell death from Type I.