ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In previous studies we found mild deficiencies of circulating T cells in patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and children at risk for BD, correlating to a higher inflammatory state. The genetic and environmental influences on these T cell deficiencies in association with BD development are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The aim is to quantify genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the association between the liability to develop BD and T cell deficiencies. METHODS: Participants of a Dutch bipolar twin study (11 monozygotic BD twin pairs, 15 dizygotic BD twin pairs, 15 monozygotic and 12 dizygotic healthy twin pairs) were included. A detailed FACS analysis of frozen stored leukocytes was carried out to determine the percentages of T cells and various other leukocyte and lymphocyte subsets. A bivariate liability threshold twin model was used to determine genetic and environmental (common and unique) influences on the correlation between BD and the various subsets. RESULTS: Lower percentages of T cells and higher percentages of NK cells were associated with the familial liability to develop BD. Neither genetic nor shared or unique environmental factors could explain the associations. Lithium usage explained part of the association for T cells, smoking in part that for NK cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that BD is the result of a complex interaction between various genetic and environmental risk factors, in which T and NK cells act as important intermediate immune players.
ABSTRACT
This is the first longitudinal twin study examining genetic and environmental contributions to the association between liability to bipolar disorder (BD) and changes over time in global brain volumes, and global and regional measures of cortical surface area, cortical thickness and cortical volume. A total of 50 twins from pairs discordant or concordant for BD (monozygotic: 8 discordant and 3 concordant pairs, and 1 patient and 3 co-twins from incomplete pairs; dizygotic: 6 discordant and 2 concordant pairs, and 1 patient and 7 co-twins from incomplete pairs) underwent magnetic resonance imaging twice. In addition, 57 twins from healthy twin pairs (15 monozygotic and 10 dizygotic pairs, and 4 monozygotic and 3 dizygotic subjects from incomplete pairs) were also scanned twice. Mean follow-up duration for all twins was 7.5 years (standard deviation: 1.5 years). Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling software OpenMx. The liability to BD was not associated with global or regional structural brain changes over time. Although we observed a subtle increase in cerebral white matter in BD patients, this effect disappeared after correction for multiple comparisons. Heritability of brain changes over time was generally low to moderate. Structural brain changes appear to follow similar trajectories in BD patients and healthy controls. Existing brain abnormalities in BD do not appear to progressively change over time, but this requires additional confirmation. Further study with large cohorts is recommended to assess genetic and environmental influences on structural brain abnormalities in BD, while taking into account the influence of lithium on the brain.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnostic imaging , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Gene-Environment Interaction , Adult , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Brain/drug effects , Diseases in Twins , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Longitudinal Studies , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Organ Size , Socioeconomic Factors , Twins, Dizygotic , Twins, MonozygoticABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD) has been linked to structural brain abnormalities. The degree to which genes and environment influence the association of BD with cortical surface area remains to be elucidated. In this twin study, genetic and environmental contributions to the association between liability to develop BD and surface area, thickness and volume of the cortex were examined. METHOD: The study cohort included 44 affected monozygotic (nine concordant, 12 discordant) and dizygotic (four concordant, 19 discordant) twin pairs, and seven twins from incomplete discordant monozygotic and dizygotic discordant twin pairs. In addition, 37 monozygotic and 24 dizygotic healthy control twin pairs, and six twins from incomplete monozygotic and dizygotic control pairs were included. RESULTS: Genetic liability to develop BD was associated with a larger cortical surface in limbic and parietal regions, and a thicker cortex in central and parietal regions. Environmental factors related to BD were associated with larger medial frontal, parietal and limbic, and smaller orbitofrontal surfaces. Furthermore, thinner frontal, limbic and occipital cortex, and larger frontal and parietal, and smaller orbitofrontal volumes were also associated with environmental factors related to BD. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that unique environmental factors play a prominent role in driving the associations between liability to develop BD and cortical measures, particularly those involving cortical thickness. Further evaluation of their influence on the surface and thickness of the cortical mantle is recommended. In addition, cortical volume appeared to be primarily dependent on surface and not thickness.
