Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction: suggestions from a multidisciplinary expert Board.

Constipation, one of the adverse effects of opioid therapy with a major impact on quality of life, is still an unmet need for cancer patients, particularly those with an advanced and progressive disease, and for non-cancer patients chronically treated with opioids. The awareness of this condition is poor among healthcare providers, despite the recent publication of guidelines and consensus conferences. An early multidisciplinary approach of opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD), based on available therapies of proven effectiveness, could support clinicians in managing this condition, thus increasing patients' adherence to pain therapy. Several Italian experts involved in the management of patients suffering from pain (anaesthesia pain therapy, oncology, haematology, palliative care, gastroenterology) joined in a Board in order to draw up an expert opinion on OIBD. The most frequent and still unsolved issues in this field were examined, including a more comprehensive definition of OIBD, the benefits of early intervention to prevent its occurrence and the most appropriate use of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs). The use of the recently introduced PAMORA naloxegol was analysed, in light of the current literature. The Board proposed a solution for each open issue in the form of recommendations, integrated with the contribution of representatives from different disciplines and often accompanied by procedural algorithms immediately usable and applicable in daily clinical practice. Safety and quality of life of the patient suffering from pain and from the adverse effects of pain therapies have been the mainstays of this expert opinion, in cooperation with general practitioners and caregivers.

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as third-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract: results of a phase II study.

Until the recent approval of vinflunine, no standard second-line chemotherapy existed for advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). Few data exist about third-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Although administered in up-front regimens, anthracyclines were never evaluated beyond second-line treatment. This study assessed the activity of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with advanced TCC previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens. From May 2005 to June 2009, 23 patients with metastatic TCC were recruited: median age was 62 years (49-76 years) with a median ECOG PS of 1. Patients received PLD 35 mg/m(2) every 21 days. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. No patient showed complete response. Three patients (13 %) had partial response; seven patients (30 %) showed stable disease for a disease control rate of 43 %. The median time to progression (TTP) was 4.1 months with a median survival time (MST) of 6.3 months. Treatment was well tolerated: no patient developed grade 4 toxicities. This is the first study which evaluated the role of anthracyclines as third-line chemotherapy in metastatic TCC. Despite its manageable profile of toxicity, PLD showed modest activity. Beyond second-line chemotherapy, supportive care still represents the best therapeutic option for patients with metastatic TCC.

[Prevalence and intensity of pain in terminally-ill cancer patients at admission in palliative care center: a mono-institutional descriptive analysis]. / II dolore nel paziente oncologico terminale: prevalenza ed intensità del sintomo all'ingresso in hospice. Analisi descrittiva monocentrica.

Pain is a distressing symptom in terminally-ill cancer and, to date, many patients still experience uncontrolled pain. We evaluated prevalence and intensity of pain at admission in Palliative Care Center. We recruited 323 patients: more than 80% referred moderate/severe pain and only 50% was adsuming strong opioids.

Weekly regimen of epirubicin and paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of urothelial tract: results of a phase II study.

Until recently, there was no standard second-line treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Although included in first-line regimens, role of anthracyclines was never investigated as second-line therapy. Single-agent paclitaxel showed modest results in this setting. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of concomitant weekly administration of epirubicin plus paclitaxel in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with platinum-based regimens. Between March 2004 and May 2008, thirty-five consecutive pretreated patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract were enrolled. Median age was 64 years (range 45-72 years), and median ECOG PS was 1 (range 0-1). Patients received epirubicin 25 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. All patients were evaluable for efficacy and toxicity; a median of four cycles was administered. One patient (3%) showed a complete response (CR), nine patients (26%) had partial response, stable disease was observed in eight patients (23%) for a disease control rate (DCR) of 52%. The median time to progression (TTP) was 7.6 months (95% CI 3.2-10.7 months) with a median survival time (MST) of 12.6 months (95% CI 4.6-18.8 months). Toxicity was acceptable and manageable: no cases of febrile neutropenia occurred and only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 neuropathy. This is the first study that evaluated the role of anthracyclines in combination with paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelium. Our findings show the substantial activity of weekly regimen of paclitaxel and epirubicin: due to its manageable profile of toxicity, this schedule could represent an interesting therapeutic option in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.