[Clozapine-induced Tubulointerstitial Nephritis].

Tubulointerstitial nephritis is a common cause of acute renal failure, in two thirds of cases it is associated with drugs (mostly antimicrobials and NSAIDs), in 5-10% of cases it is associated with infections (bacterial/viral/parasitic), in 5-10% of cases it is idiopathic (this is the case of the TINU syndrome characterized by interstitial nephritis and bilateral uveitis, and the anti-glomerular basal membrane antibody syndrome), and finally in 10% of cases it is associated with systemic diseases (sarcoidosis, by Sjogren, LES). The pathogenesis is based on a cell-mediated immune response and in most cases removing the causative agent is the gold standard of therapy. However, a percentage of patients, in a variable range from 30% to 70% of cases, do not fully recover renal function, due to the rapid transformation of the interstitial cell infiltrate into vast areas of fibrosis. Clozapine is a second generation atypical antipsycothic usually used for the treatment of schizophrenia resistant to other types of treatment; it can cause severe adverse effects among which the best known is a severe and potentially fatal neutropenia, furthermore a series of uncommon adverse events are recognized including hepatitis, pancreatitis, vasculitis. Cases of acute interstitial tubular nephritis associated with the use of clozapine have been described in the literature, although this complication is rare. Medical personnel using this drug need to be aware of this potential and serious side effect. We describe the case of a 48-year-old man who developed acute renal failure after initiation of clozapine.

An account of the first hours of the Covid-19 epidemic at the Nephrology Unit in Lodi (Lombardy).

Marco Farina and colleagues give us their account of the first days of the Covid-19 epidemic in the Nephrology Unit of the Ospedale Maggiore in Lodi. From the news trickling through from Codogno on the 20th of February to the hospitalization, the following day, of the first dialytic patient with signs of pneumonia, who later tested positive to the virus. They tell us of how the hospital has been completely restructured in the wake of the epidemic, at remarkable speed and providing an example for others to follow, and the great sense self-sacrifice displayed by all medical personnel. After an overview of the clinical conditions of the 7 patients positive to the virus hospitalised in the following few days, they describe in some detail how symptomatic Covid+ patients are currently managed at the Ospedale Maggiore in Lodi.

Effects of two different dialytic treatments on inflammatory markers in people with end-stage renal disease with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This study was aimed to evaluate the effects on some inflammatory markers of two dialytic treatments [bicarbonate dialysis (BHD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF)] in patients with severe chronic kidney disease. We evaluated: blood glucose, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index, homocistein (Hcs), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), fibrinogen, lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], metalloproteinases-2, and -9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9), and soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE). Considering the all sample, we observed a decrease of sRAGE with BHD, but not with HDF. Fibrinogen, MMP-2, and -9, Hs-CRP decreased after HDF, but not after BHD. In diabetics, blood glucose decreased after HDF dialysis, but not after BHD. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products obtained with HDF were higher compared to BHD. Fibrinogen, MMP-2, MMP-9, Hcs, Hs-CRP decreased, and ADN increased after HDF, these changes did not happen after BHD. Furthermore, sRAGE, and ADN were higher, and MMP-2 lower after HDF. In euglycemic patients, instead, MMP-2, MMP-9, and Hs-CRP decreased, and ADN increased with HDF, but not with BHD. We can conclude that hemodiafiltration seems to greater reduce inflammatory markers, and it could be more suitable for people with type 2 diabetes. Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01049152.

Bicarbonate dialysis compared to hemodiafiltration on glycemic excursions in patients with end-stage renal disease with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus.

AIM: To evaluate the effects on glycemic excursions during bicarbonate dialysis (BHD) compared to hemodiafiltration (HDF) in type 2 diabetic or not diabetic patients affected by end-stage renal disease (ESRD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients (20 affected by type 2 diabetes mellitus, and 16 not diabetic patients) were evaluated and underwent BHD dialysis, followed by HDF dialysis two days later. All patients underwent also glucose continuous monitoring system, using iPro Continuous Glucose Monitor System (Medtronic MiniMed) starting just before the BHD, and ending five days later, two days after the HDF dialysis. Glycemic control was estimated as the mean blood glucose (MBG), the area under the glucose curve above 70mg/dl (AUC>70) or 180mg/dl (AUC>180), and the percentage of time above 70mg/dl (t>70) or 180mg/dl (t>180). Intraday glycemic variability was assessed as the standard deviation (SD), M value, and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). Day-to-day glycemic variability was assessed as the mean of daily difference (MODD), that is the mean of the absolute difference among glucose values taken on 2 consecutive days at the same time. RESULTS: glycemic control was better with HDF: MBG, and AUC>180 were lower during HDF compared do BHD. We also observed a significant decrease of glycemic excursions during HDF dialysis: SD, M value, and the MAGE value were lower with HDF. The MODD value was significantly changed in BHD group, while no differences were recorded during HDF. CONCLUSION: HDF seems to greater reduce glycemic excursions during the treatment compared to BHD.

Sirolimus vs cyclosporine after induction with basiliximab does not promote regulatory T cell expansion in de novo kidney transplantation: Results from a single-center randomized trial.

Regulatory T cells (Tregs), defined as CD4+CD25+highFoxP3+CD127- cells, could promote tolerance in renal transplantation (Tx). In an open-label, randomized, controlled trial 62 de-novo Tx recipients received induction with basiliximab and cyclosporine A (CsA) for the first month after Tx and then were assigned to treatment with sirolimus (SRL) or CsA and followed up for 2 years. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the effects of induction and maintenance treatments on circulating Tregs, while the secondary endpoint was the assessment of Treg renal infiltration and the relationship between Treg count and clinical outcomes. There were no significant differences in either circulating or tissue Treg number between the two groups. At 1 month post-Tx, all patients presented a profound Treg depletion, followed by a significant increase in Tregs that resulted stable during the follow-up. The same trend was also observed for non-activated Tregs (CD69-) and for other immunocompetent cells (CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells and NK cells). Moreover, the Treg count did not correlate either with renal function or with acute rejection and graft loss. Initial immunosuppression is crucial to regulate circulating Tregs, regardless of subsequent immunosuppressive maintenance regimens. Strategies aiming to promote tolerance should consider the effects of different induction regimens.

[Heparin-induced trombocytopenia: pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and management in hemodialysis]. / Piastrinopenia indotta da eparina: patogenesi, manifestazioni cliniche e management in emodialisi.

Heparin has remained the most commonly used anticoagulant in hemodialysis patients (HD). Its use is usually safe but, in some cases, important adverse effects can occur. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immuno-mediated condition due to the formation of PF4/heparin/IgG complex leading to the activation of platelets and coagulative cascade. The consequent prothrombotic hypercoagulable state may cause venous or arterial thrombosis, skin gangrene and acute platelet activation syndrome. Clinical and laboratory findings may be suggestive for HIT, but formal diagnosis requires the demonstration of the presence of circulating antibodies. Clinical management is complex including the withdrawal of any form of heparin and the administration of anticoagulants. In addition, since anticoagulation is routinely required to prevent clotting of the dialysis lines and membranes, in HD patients presenting HIT it is mandatory to establish heparin-free anticoagulation strategies. Thus, the use of citrate, direct thrombin inhibitors or eparinods have been proposed as alternative anticoagulation approaches in HIT. Here, we review the most important pathogenic factors and clinical features of HIT occurring in HD patients.