Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Aust J Rural Health ; 32(2): 249-262, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38646861

ABSTRACT

INTROUDCTION: There is increased risk of skin cancer in patients with gloermular disease or those with renal transplant. OBJECTIVES: To compare the risk of skin cancer between kidney recipients (KTRs) and patients with glomerular disease (GD). DESIGN: The cohort comprised patients with KTRs (n = 61) and GD (n = 51) in Central and Central West Queensland, Australia. A quantitative cohort study was undertaken to study the risk of skin cancer in rural communities between two subgroups of patients with kidney diseases in relationship to immunosuppression. Statistical analyses of the differences in incidence of skin cancers between the two groups were done by chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, independent t-test and McNemar's test. FINDINGS: KTRs with non-melanoma skin carcinoma (NMSC) increased significantly after treatment with immunosuppressants (pre-transplantation, n = 11 [18.0%], post-transplantation, n = 28 [45.9%]; p < 0.001). There were no differences in number of patients with NMSC observed in the GD group (pre-diagnosis, n = 6 [11.8%], post-diagnosis, n = 7 [13.7%]; p = 1.000). Compared to the risks at 1 year post-immunosuppressants, the incidence of NMSC of KTRs increased significantly at 3 years (20.3% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) and 5 years (20.3% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.001) post-immunosuppressants, whereas the increased incidence of NMSC was observed only at 5 years (2.1% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.012) in the GD cohort. The mean cumulative number of NMSC in KTRs increased significantly at 3 years (p = 0.011), and 5 years (p = 0.001) post-immunosuppressants, compared to the risks at 1 year post-immunosuppressants, however, no differences were noted in the GD cohort. DISCUSSION: Immunosuppressants increased the risk of NMSC in KTRs. The increased risk is likely dependent on the intensity and duration of immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION: In patients with a high risk of NMSC, reducing skin cancer risk should be considered in conjunction with the optimisation of treatment.


Subject(s)
Kidney Transplantation , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Queensland/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cohort Studies , Incidence , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 23(1): 361, 2022 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36357857

ABSTRACT

Sun-protective strategies focusing on skin cancer awareness are needed in immunosuppressed patients at risk of skin cancers. The study aims to determine the effect of an integrated skin cancer education program on skin cancer awareness and sun-protective behaviours in renal transplant recipients (RTRs) and patients with glomerular disease (GD) treated with long-term immunosuppressants. A pilot prospective cohort study in Central Queensland, Australia was undertaken among adult RTRs and patients with GD, who completed survey questionaries on skin cancer and sun-health knowledge (SCSK), sun-protection practices and skin examination pre- and post-education. Fifty patients (25 RTRs, 25 patients with GD) participated in the study. All of them completed questionnaires at pre-, 3-month post-education and 92%(n = 46) at 6-month post-education. There was a significant increase in SCSK scores from baseline at 3-months (p < 0.001) and 6-months post-intervention (p < 0.01). Improved knowledge was retained for 6 months after education. There were changes in 2 of 8 photoprotective behaviours at 6 months. Interventional education enhanced regular self-skin examination rate (p < 0.001) as well as the frequency of full skin checks by general practitioners (GPs) (p < 0.001). Overall, RTRs had better compliance with sun-protective methods and higher skin examination rates by themselves and/ or GPs before and after the intervention of education compared to patients with GD. To conclude, an integrated skin cancer education program improved knowledge of skin cancer and skin health as well as the frequency of self-skin examination and formal skin assessments. However, improvement in patient compliance did not extend to other sun-protective practices.


Subject(s)
Health Education , Kidney Diseases , Kidney Transplantation , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Humans , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Kidney Diseases/etiology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Transplant Recipients
3.
Nephrology (Carlton) ; 26(4): 294-302, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34308553

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no previous study that compare skin cancer awareness and photoprotective behaviours between renal transplant recipients (RTR) and patients with glomerular disease (GD). OBJECTIVES/METHODS: Sixty-one RTR and 51 patients with GD were given a self-reported questionnaire to evaluate skin cancer awareness and photoprotective behaviours in this cross-sectional study. The former group received a formal education on skin cancer and the latter an informal session prior to immunosuppressant use. RESULTS: Ninety-three percent (n = 57) of RTRs and 88% (n = 45) of patients with GD responded to the survey. Majority of participants from both groups were aware that ultraviolet radiation could play a role in the occurrence of skin cancers and the awareness increased in participants with higher education (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15-1.95, P = .003). Ninety-eight percent vs 71% were aware that immunosuppressants can increase the risk of developing cancer (P < .001) and higher awareness was noted in younger participants (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.87-0.97, P = .003). Suboptimal photoprotective behaviours (sun avoidance, sunscreen usage and sun-protective clothing) were noted in both cohorts and slightly lower sun protection rates were reported in RTR when compared with patients having GD. The level of sun protective measures in RTR based on high, moderate and minimal use of photoprotective measures were 21%, 46% and 33%, respectively. In terms of patients with GD, the latter practices were 13%, 50% and 37%, respectively (P = .560). Higher educational status was significantly associated with better sunscreen usage in RTR (P = .017) whereas this finding was not observed in patients with GD. CONCLUSION: Patients with GD and RTR should have formal education on the risks of skin cancers before starting immunosuppressants. Follow-up education and surveillance is required to improve skin protective practices in these patients.


Subject(s)
Glomerulonephritis/drug therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Kidney Transplantation , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/prevention & control , Skin Neoplasms/prevention & control , Transplant Recipients , Ultraviolet Rays/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Glomerulonephritis/diagnosis , Glomerulonephritis/immunology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/immunology , Patient Education as Topic , Protective Factors , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Risk Reduction Behavior , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Skin Neoplasms/immunology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...