From Chest Trauma to Coronary Artery Dissection.

Despite being rare, traumatic coronary artery dissection after blunt chest trauma can lead to life-threatening consequences that can be fatal. This case report focuses on a 51-year-old woman who suffered chest trauma at home and was later found to have right coronary artery dissection. This manuscript aims to elucidate the risk factors, diagnostic challenges, and management strategies associated with traumatic coronary artery dissection. This case report emphasizes the evaluation of risk factors, the significance of early detection with appropriate imaging modalities while maintaining high clinical suspicion, and the critical necessity of optimizing patient outcomes in such circumstances.

Operator Radiation Exposure During Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Background: The level of radiation exposure received by operators performing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is not well investigated. The aim of this study is to measure the amount of radiation received by operators performing transfemoral TAVR and to identify various patient and procedural characteristics associated with increased radiation exposure. Methods: Primary (operator 1) and secondary (operator 2) operators' equivalent radiation doses in micro Sieverts (µSv) were calculated prospectively using real-time radiation dosimeters for a total of 140 consecutive transfemoral TAVRs. Corresponding eye and thorax radiation exposures between the operators were compared. Associations between various patient and procedural characteristics and the radiation exposure were tested using the t-test and Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank-sum test with Monte Carlo estimation. Multivariable regression analysis was also conducted. Results: Operator 1 had significantly higher cumulative equivalent radiation exposure than operator 2 (86 µSv vs 38 µSv, p-value: <0.0001) which was consistent at the level of the thorax (67 µSv vs 22 µSv, p-value: <0.0001), but not at the level of the eye (16.5 µSv vs 15 µSv, p-value: 0.30). On multivariable analysis, patient obesity and intraprocedural complications were associated with higher radiation exposure to both operators. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention led to excessive radiation exposure to the secondary operator. Conclusions: Transfemoral TAVR is associated with a modest amount of radiation exposure to operators and is significantly higher for the primary operator than for the secondary operator.

Comparison of Standard Catheters Versus Radial Artery-Specific Catheter in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Angiography Through Transradial Access.

In this prospective, randomized controlled study, we aim to compare the performance outcomes of standard catheters with the radial artery-specific catheter. Over the past decade, transradial cardiac catheterization has gained widespread popularity because of its low complication rates compared with transfemoral access. Operators have the choice of using either standard catheters (used for both transfemoral and transradial approach, with need for separate catheter use for either right or left coronary artery engagement) or a dedicated radial artery catheter, which is specifically designed to engage both coronary arteries through radial artery access. A total of 110 consecutive patients who underwent coronary angiography at our institution from March 2015 to April 2015 were prospectively randomized to either radial artery-specific Tiger catheter (5Fr; Terumo Interventional Systems, Somerset, New Jersey) versus standard Judkins left and right catheters (5Fr R4, L4; Cordis Corporation, Miami, Florida). The end points of the study included fluoroscopy time, dose-area product, contrast volume used, and total procedure time for the coronary angiography. A total of 57 patients (52%) were randomized to radial artery-specific catheter and 53 (48%) to the standard catheter. Tiger catheter was associated with significantly lower fluoroscopy time (184 ± 91 vs 238 ± 131 seconds, p = 0.015), which was statistically significant. Other outcome measures such as dose-area product (2,882.4 ± 1,471.2 vs 3,524.6 ± 2,111.7 Gy·cm(2), p = 0.07), total contrast volume (48.1 ± 16.1 vs 53.4 ± 18.5 ml, p = 0.114), and total procedure time (337 ± 382 vs 434 ± 137 seconds, p = 0.085) were also lower in single-catheter group, but it did not reach statistical significance. A total of 8 patients (14%) were crossed over from radial-specific catheter arm to standard catheter arm because of substandard image quality and difficulty in coronary engagement. Six patients had to be switched to femoral access (3 in each group) secondary to radial artery spasm. In conclusion, the radial artery-specific catheter was shown to have significantly lower fluoroscopy times but higher failure rates compared with the standard catheters.

Paradoxical arterial emboli causing acute limb ischemia in a patient with essential thrombocytosis.

Acute arterial occlusion can be the result of acute thrombosis or systemic embolism. Paradoxical embolism of a venous thrombosis through a right-to-left shunt is an important cause of acute limb ischemia. We describe a young patient with acute limb ischemia who was found to have multiple deep venous thromboses causing arterial embolization through a patent foramen ovale. Essential thrombocytosis was found to be the risk factor for venous thromboses in this patient. The patient was managed with embolectomy and anticoagulation along with chemotherapeutic cytoreduction of platelet count. This case illustrates the importance of considering the systemic embolism as a cause of acute arterial occlusion. The presence of a hypercoagulable status such as chronic myeloproliferative disorder does not eliminate the possibility of systemic embolism in the event of acute arterial occlusion. Patients presenting with acute limb ischemia should be evaluated for embolic sources. The presence of deep venous thrombosis in such a patient should prompt the evaluation for a patent foramen ovale.