ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This review will evaluate the effectiveness of dose-intensified versus standard-dose salvage regimens on progression-free survival in early progressed follicular lymphoma before high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. INTRODUCTION: Despite the substantial advances in the management of follicular lymphoma, approximately 20% of patients experience progression of the disease within 2 years of induction therapy. These patients have worse outcomes, and autologous stem cell transplantation is deemed to improve outcomes in this context. Little is known about the optimal salvage regimen. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies must include patients ≥18 years old with early progressed follicular lymphoma who were submitted to autologous stem cell transplantation in subsequent remission. Clinical trials and observational studies will be included. METHODS: The search strategy will be carried out in MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Periódicos CAPES), Scopus, Web of Science, LiLACS, and the Cochrane Library. No date or language restrictions will be imposed. The recommended JBI approach to critical appraisal, study selection, data extraction, and data synthesis will be used. Studies should score at least 50% in accordance with the critical appraisal tool. Data will be pooled whenever possible using the random effects model. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the standard χ2 and I2 tests. A funnel plot will be generated to assess publication bias if there are 10 or more studies included in the meta-analysis. The GRADE approach will be used to rate certainty of evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42022373345.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Miltefosine is a new drug that was recently approved for the treatment of tegumentary leishmaniasis (TL) by the Brazilian health system. It has a teratogenic potential and requires follow-up of patients undergoing treatment. Improving compliance with best practices is essential to ensure the safe and appropriate use of this drug. OBJECTIVE: This project aimed to implement best practices for the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine in the treatment of TL in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. METHODS: This project was guided by the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework. Five best practice criteria were established based on the best available evidence. A baseline audit was conducted to measure current practice against best practice. Barriers to best practice were then identified and a follow-up audit was conducted to evaluate changes after the implementation of improvement strategies. Two sites were analyzed: a leishmaniasis reference service in Belo Horizonte, the capital of Minas Gerais, and the 28 regional offices. RESULTS: The baseline audit evaluated data from 197 miltefosine requests distributed across 13 regional sites. All requests from the reference service were compliant (100%). This is in contrast to the 60% compliance rate at the regional offices. The improvement strategies included intensifying direct communication with the regional health professionals, which increased the average compliance rate to 79.5%, 6 months after the interventions were introduced. CONCLUSION: This best practice implementation project effectively increased the compliance rate for the audited procedures. Communication from the reference site with the regional health professionals successfully increased compliance with best practices and promoted the safe and appropriate use of miltefosine. These strategies should analyzed and applied to improve other programs. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A184.
