Autologous fat as a rectal-prostate spacer for prostate brachytherapy: Results at 6 months.

PURPOSE: Implanted rectal spacers (IRS) have been developed to increase the distance between the prostate and the rectum, thus optimizing dose escalation. Cost is a disadvantage and there are still uncertainties as to their durability. We have developed an autologous fat transfer (AFT) technique to use as an IRS. We aim to present the feasibility and durability at 6 months of AFT placed immediately after the implant of the seeds in low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients underwent AFT (12 were treated with primary BT, 7 with a combined primary treatment of external beam radiotherapy + BT, 16 with salvage BT). The isodose used for primary BT was 14400 cGy, 11,000 cGy after 4600 cGy of external beam radiotherapy in the combined group, and 14400 cGy for the salvage group. Patients underwent a CT scan at 1, 3, and 6 months to measure the distance between the rectum and the prostate. RESULTS: An average of 32.7 cc (20-40) of fat was transferred successfully in 100% of cases. The mean distance to the rectum at the level of the base, middle, and apex at 1 and 6 months were 11.2, 9.7, and 7.6 mm; 8.3, 8.1, and 5.9 mm, respectively. No rectal toxicity or major complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The use of fat as an IRS seems to be a valid alternative to reduce rectal toxicity after BT, achieving equivalent distances to synthetic IRS. It is feasible, safe, and the loss of distance at 6 months is small. Cost is lower than other alternatives.

MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), with or without targeted biopsy, is an alternative to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy for prostate-cancer detection in men with a raised prostate-specific antigen level who have not undergone biopsy. However, comparative evidence is limited. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial, we assigned men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously to undergo MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, or standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. Men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group underwent a targeted biopsy (without standard biopsy cores) if the MRI was suggestive of prostate cancer; men whose MRI results were not suggestive of prostate cancer were not offered biopsy. Standard biopsy was a 10-to-12-core, transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy. The primary outcome was the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of men who received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer. RESULTS: A total of 500 men underwent randomization. In the MRI-targeted biopsy group, 71 of 252 men (28%) had MRI results that were not suggestive of prostate cancer, so they did not undergo biopsy. Clinically significant cancer was detected in 95 men (38%) in the MRI-targeted biopsy group, as compared with 64 of 248 (26%) in the standard-biopsy group (adjusted difference, 12 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 20; P=0.005). MRI, with or without targeted biopsy, was noninferior to standard biopsy, and the 95% confidence interval indicated the superiority of this strategy over standard biopsy. Fewer men in the MRI-targeted biopsy group than in the standard-biopsy group received a diagnosis of clinically insignificant cancer (adjusted difference, -13 percentage points; 95% CI, -19 to -7; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of risk assessment with MRI before biopsy and MRI-targeted biopsy was superior to standard transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy in men at clinical risk for prostate cancer who had not undergone biopsy previously. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research and the European Association of Urology Research Foundation; PRECISION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02380027 .).

Outpatient simultaneous treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia and bladder lithiasis with GreenLight™ and holmium laser.

PURPOSE: To evaluate our experience in the combined treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and bladder lithiasis with GreenLight(™) and holmium laser, respectively, on an outpatient basis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From August 2006 to May 2009, 20 patients with prostatic hyperplasia and bladder lithiasis were treated. First, the lithiasis was treated, and then the GreenLight laser vaporization of the prostate was performed, both at the same surgical time and under general anesthesia. Discharge of patients was scheduled 3 to 4 hours after completion of the procedure. RESULTS: The procedure was simultaneously completed in 19 of 20 patients. The mean stone size was 2.3 (1-4) cm, and the mean prostate volume was 56.5 (30-108) cc. The mean operating time was 115 (50-190) minutes. There was a significant percentage change in maximum flow, postmicturition residual volume, and International Prostate Symptom Score, which were 129.5%, 88.4%, and 68.3%, respectively. All patients were stone free after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The combined transurethral treatment of BPH associated with bladder lithiasis by means of GreenLight laser vaporization and holmium laser lithotripsy on an outpatient basis can be performed safely and yields excellent results.