The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.

When applied as a tool for hearing aid fitting, categorical loudness scaling (CLS) is time consuming and not feasible in all subjects. It is therefore desirable to use objective measures for accurate prediction of loudness categories among hearing-impaired individuals. The present study aimed at exploring whether loudness perception at the ART is constant with varying hearing threshold. Seventy-five subjects with various degrees of hearing impairment, measurable acoustic reflex and normal middle ear function participated. The HTLs, ARTs and the levels of six loudness categories at frequencies 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz were determined for all subjects. Loudness at the ART was found to be correlated with the amount of hearing loss. On the basis of these results, it is concluded that the ART cannot be used for accurate estimation of loudness in hearing-impaired subjects.

The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.

The working hypothesis of an ongoing study is that the quick and reliable procedure of acoustic reflex threshold (ART) determination in conjunction with measurements of HTL may yield accurate estimates of loudness. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences in loudness in normally-hearing subjects are reflected in the ARTs and to collect normal material with respect to pure-tone elicited ART and loudness categories. Categorical loudness scaling (CLS) and ART measurements were performed at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz in 60 normally-hearing subjects (HTL<20 dB HL, 26 males, 34 females, aged 21-63 years) with no history or sequelae of middle ear disease. Subjects reporting disturbing tinnitus were excluded. The results show that the ART is not a predictor of individual loudness perception for normally-hearing subjects. Using a numerical scale (HTL=0, 'very soft'=5, 'soft'=15, 'OK'=25, 'loud'=35, 'very loud'=45 and 'too loud'=50) loudness for pure tones grows almost linearly at approximately 0.4 arbitrary loudness units per dB below the 'loud' category. Above the 'loud' category the slope is around 1 unit per dB. The median ART was 85 dB HL at frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz. No differences in loudness perception across frequencies were found.

Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.

The aim of this study was to explore possible differences in the perception of loudness between long-term hearing aid full-time users and non-users. Categorical loudness scaling using pure-tone stimuli was carried out by hearing-impaired subjects. The mean levels of loudness categories at one frequency (hearing threshold: 50-75 dB HL) in a group of 18 hearing aid users (daily use < or = 15 hours per day) were compared with the corresponding levels found in 18 hearing-impaired non-users with the same distribution of hearing thresholds. The results show that, for hearing losses of 50-75 dB HL, the mean level rated as 'loud' by long-term full-time users of hearing aids is 4.5 dB above the mean level of the corresponding category rated by non-users. This difference is statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant differences were found for the lower categories. Among those subjects who had been wearing hearing aids for at least six months, no significant correlation was found between the levels of the 'loud' category and the length of time that hearing aids had been used.

Long-term test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling in normal-hearing subjects using pure-tone stimuli.

The present study investigates the test-retest reliability of category loudness scaling with pure tones for each of the scaling categories: 'very soft', 'soft', 'OK', 'loud', 'very loud' and 'too loud' at the audiometric frequencies 0.5, 1 kHz, 2 kHz and 4 kHz. Category loudness scaling at two sessions separated by between 1 and 4 weeks was obtained from 16 normal-hearing subjects who all had normal otoscopy, present acoustic reflexes at audiometric frequencies 0.5-4 kHz and middle ear pressure within +/-50 daPa. Intra-subject between-session reliability was found not to be frequency dependent, and comparison with other studies revealed that reliability is not dependent on the applied stimulus signal. Test-retest reliability varied between the different categories: In the categories 'very soft', 'loud', 'very loud' and 'too loud' the test reliability is in the same range as found for hearing thresholds determination, whereas for the 'soft' and 'OK' categories it is poorer. The greater uncertainty for intermediate levels should be considered when using category loudness scaling, e.g. for calculating hearing aid parameters.