Simple protocol for measuring CD11b+ GR-1+ (Ly6C+/Ly6G+) myeloid cells from a minimum volume of mouse peripheral blood.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) comprise a heterogeneous population of myeloid origin and immature state, whose hallmark is the capacity to suppress T cells and other immune populations. In mice, the first approach to identify MDSCs relies in the measurement of their phenotypical markers: CD11b and GR-1. In addition, two main subtypes of MDSCs have been defined based on the expression of the following markers: CD11b+ Ly6G- Ly6C+ (monocytic-MDSCs, M-MDSCs) and CD11b+ Ly6G+ Ly6C+/low (polymorphonuclear-MDSCs, PMN-MDSCs). Since CD11b+ GR-1+ (Ly6C+/Ly6G+) MDSCs can increase significantly in peripheral blood during numerous acute or chronic processes, measuring alterations in the phenotypic markers CD11b and GR-1 could be important as a first step before assessing the suppressive function of the cells. In many cases it could be necessary to measure CD11b+ Gr-1+ cells from a minimum volume of peripheral blood cells without greatly affecting animal viability, since this approach would allow for further studies to be conducted on subsequent days, such as measuring parameters of the immune response or even survival in the context of the pathology under study. The following protocol describes a simple and optimized protocol for measuring the presence of CD11b+ GR-1+ (Ly6C+/Ly6G+) myeloid cells using 2+ channel flow cytometry, from a minimum volume of mouse peripheral blood obtained by facial vein puncture.

Role of myeloid-derived suppressor cells during Trypanosoma cruzi infection.

Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, is the third largest parasitic disease burden globally. Currently, more than 6 million people are infected, mainly in Latin America, but international migration has turned CD into an emerging health problem in many nonendemic countries. Despite intense research, a vaccine is still not available. A complex parasite life cycle, together with numerous immune system manipulation strategies, may account for the lack of a prophylactic or therapeutic vaccine. There is substantial experimental evidence supporting that T. cruzi acute infection generates a strong immunosuppression state that involves numerous immune populations with regulatory/suppressive capacity. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), Foxp3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs), regulatory dendritic cells and B regulatory cells are some of the regulatory populations that have been involved in the acute immune response elicited by the parasite. The fact that, during acute infection, MDSCs increase notably in several organs, such as spleen, liver and heart, together with the observation that depletion of those cells can decrease mouse survival to 0%, strongly suggests that MDSCs play a major role during acute T. cruzi infection. Accumulating evidence gained in different settings supports the capacity of MDSCs to interact with cells from both the effector and the regulatory arms of the immune system, shaping the outcome of the response in a very wide range of scenarios that include pathological and physiological processes. In this sense, the aim of the present review is to describe the main knowledge about MDSCs acquired so far, including several crosstalk with other immune populations, which could be useful to gain insight into their role during T. cruzi infection.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells and vaccination against pathogens.

It is widely accepted that the immune system includes molecular and cellular components that play a role in regulating and suppressing the effector immune response in almost any process in which the immune system is involved. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are described as a heterogeneous population of myeloid origin, immature state, with a strong capacity to suppress T cells and other immune populations. Although the initial characterization of these cells was strongly associated with pathological conditions such as cancer and then with chronic and acute infections, extensive evidence supports that MDSCs are also involved in physiological/non-pathological settings, including pregnancy, neonatal period, aging, and vaccination. Vaccination is one of the greatest public health achievements and has reduced mortality and morbidity caused by many pathogens. The primary goal of prophylactic vaccination is to induce protection against a potential pathogen by mimicking, at least in a part, the events that take place during its natural interaction with the host. This strategy allows the immune system to prepare humoral and cellular effector components to cope with the real infection. This approach has been successful in developing vaccines against many pathogens. However, when the infectious agents can evade and subvert the host immune system, inducing cells with regulatory/suppressive capacity, the development of vaccines may not be straightforward. Notably, there is a long list of complex pathogens that can expand MDSCs, for which a vaccine is still not available. Moreover, vaccination against numerous bacteria, viruses, parasites, and fungi has also been shown to cause MDSC expansion. Increases are not due to a particular adjuvant or immunization route; indeed, numerous adjuvants and immunization routes have been reported to cause an accumulation of this immunosuppressive population. Most of the reports describe that, according to their suppressive nature, MDSCs may limit vaccine efficacy. Taking into account the accumulated evidence supporting the involvement of MDSCs in vaccination, this review aims to compile the studies that highlight the role of MDSCs during the assessment of vaccines against pathogens.