Implementing a one-day testing model improves timeliness of workup for patients with lung cancer.

Background: Patients with lung cancer often experience stressful delays throughout the diagnostic phase of care. To address that situation, our multidisciplinary team created a "Navigation Day," during which patients partake in a single-day visit that comprises nurse-led teaching, social work, smoking cessation counselling, symptom control, and dedicated test slots for integrated positron-emission tomography and computed tomography (pet/ct), pulmonary function tests (pfts), and magnetic resonance imaging (mri) of the brain. We evaluated the effects of that program on wait times and patient satisfaction. Methods: Patients with a suspicion of lung cancer on chest ct imaging referred during 3 time periods were reviewed: 1 year before launch of the Navigation Day, 1 year post-launch, and 2 years post-launch. Patients were further stratified according to concordance of their test date with a Navigation Day date. Mean wait times for pet/ct, pfts, and mri brain were calculated for each group. Patient satisfaction was measured using a standardized provincial survey. The Student t-test and analysis of variance were used to assess for significance. Results: After implementation, mean wait times in the first year improved to 9.2 days from 15.5 days for pet/ct (p < 0.0001), to 9.6 days from 15.7 days for pfts (p < 0.0001), and to 10.2 days from 16.0 days for mri brain (p < 0.0001). Patients who used a dedicated test slot experienced the shortest wait times, at 5.8 days for pet/ct, 5.8 days for pfts, and 6.3 days for mri brain (p < 0.0001). Those improvements were sustained at 2 years post-launch. Patient satisfaction in the categories of assistance, emotional support, and clarity remained high post-launch. Conclusions: Navigation Day significantly improved the timeliness of diagnostic testing services in patients with suspected lung cancer.

Regional process redesign of lung cancer care: a learning health system pilot project.

BACKGROUND: The Ottawa Hospital (toh) defined delay to timely lung cancer care as a system design problem. Recognizing the patient need for an integrated journey and the need for dynamic alignment of providers, toh used a learning health system (lhs) vision to redesign regional diagnostic processes. A lhs is driven by feedback utilizing operational and clinical information to drive system optimization and innovation. An essential component of a lhs is a collaborative platform that provides connectivity across silos, organizations, and professions. METHODS: To operationalize a lhs, we developed the Ottawa Health Transformation Model (ohtm) as a consensus approach that addresses process barriers, resistance to change, and conflicting priorities. A regional Community of Practice (cop) was established to engage stakeholders, and a dedicated transformation team supported process improvements and implementation. RESULTS: The project operationalized the lung cancer diagnostic pathway and optimized patient flow from referral to initiation of treatment. Twelve major processes in referral, review, diagnostics, assessment, triage, and consult were redesigned. The Ottawa Hospital now provides a diagnosis to 80% of referrals within the provincial target of 28 days. The median patient journey from referral to initial treatment decreased by 48% from 92 to 47 days. CONCLUSIONS: The initiative optimized regional integration from referral to initial treatment. Use of a lhs lens enabled the creation of a system that is standardized to best practice and open to ongoing innovation. Continued transformation initiatives across the continuum of care are needed to incorporate best practice and optimize delivery systems for regional populations.

Interobserver reliability of compression ultrasound for residual thrombosis after first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of residual thrombosis is of clinical importance for diagnostic baseline imaging, and may be of value in risk stratification for recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). This study evaluated the interobserver reliability of the measurement of residual thrombosis in patients 6 months after a first unprovoked deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the leg. PATIENTS/METHODS: All enrolled patients received two ultrasound examinations by two independent blinded ultrasound technicians 5-7 months after their first unprovoked DVT. In total, 49 patients completed the two baseline ultrasound examinations. During the examinations, the presence of residual thrombosis was evaluated. If residual thrombosis was present, a detailed description of the size and location was reported. After all ultrasound results had been collected, the interobserver agreement was calculated by use of the kappa statistics, Pearson correlation, and the Bland-Altman plot. Furthermore, the clinical implications of interobserver reliability were examined. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability of the assessment of whether residual thrombosis is present was very good (κ = 0.92). The interobserver reliability of the measurement of residual thrombosis was good (r2 = 0.648), with a limited number of patients being misclassified. For the assessment of the percentage of residual occlusion, the interobserver reliability was fair (r2 = 0.357). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the interobserver reliability for measurement of residual thrombosis is high, and that the variability introduced by interobserver reliability has minimal clinical implications. Our study is important for the use of baseline imaging for the diagnostic and prognostic management of recurrent VTE.