Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Hum Virol ; 4(5): 278-82, 2001.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11907385

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To use two rapid human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) tests at labor, measure test acceptance and performance, and measure HIV prevalence in these women. METHODS: Between February and October 2000, two rapid tests (Determine; Abbott, Chicago, IL, U.S.A. and Double Check; Orgenics, Yavne, Israel) were used in three public maternities in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot (WB) analysis confirmed positive and discordant results. RESULTS: Of the 858 patients who were enrolled, the mean gestational age was 36 weeks (median = 39, mode = 40) and 17 (2%) refused testing. Of the 841 patients tested, 13 were positive by both tests, which represents a 1.5% prevalence (95% confidence interval: 0.7%-2.3%); all were confirmed by ELISA and WB analysis. Seven samples gave discordant results by the rapid tests; of these, six were ELISA-negative/WB-negative and one was ELISA-negative/WB-indeterminate. The positive predictive value for samples that were positive by both rapid tests simultaneously was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Two rapid HIV tests used at labor were well accepted (98%). When the combined results of the two rapid tests (but not a single rapid test) were analyzed, this strategy was as efficient as the standard ELISA and WB HIV strategy for correctly classifying individuals.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections/diagnosis , HIV-1/isolation & purification , Labor, Obstetric , Blotting, Western/methods , Brazil/epidemiology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Female , HIV Infections/blood , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV-1/immunology , Humans , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...