Sympathetic and parasympathetic neuropathy are frequent in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of sympathetic versus parasympathetic neuropathy among type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: There were 43 patients with type 1 and 17 with type 2 diabetes who were investigated. Sympathetic nerve function was assessed by measurement of the vasoconstriction (VAC) index by laser Doppler perfusion imaging of a locally heated finger followed by indirect cooling. Parasympathetic nerve function was assessed by R-R interval variation during deep breathing as measured by the expiration/inspiration (E/I) ratio. Results were expressed as age-corrected z scores in SD; VAC index >1.64 SD and E/I ratio <-1.64 SD were considered abnormal. RESULTS: VAC index was abnormal in 40% with type 1 and 41% with type 2 diabetes, whereas the E/I ratio was abnormal in 42% with type 1 and 65% with type 2 diabetes. There was a clear association between VAC index and E/I ratio among type 1 (rs=0.525; P=0.0002) but not among type 2 (rs=0.10) diabetic patients. Among type 2 diabetic patients, the degree of dysfunction was most severe regarding parasympathetic function (P=0.0167). CONCLUSIONS: Sympathetic and parasympathetic neuropathy were frequent in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. However, there was a difference between the two types of diabetes. Sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve functions correlated in type 1 but not in type 2 diabetic patients. The explanation for this discrepancy might be that parasympathetic nerve function was most severely affected among type 2 diabetic patients.

Laser Doppler perfusion monitoring of skin blood flow at different depths in finger and arm upon local heating.

The purpose of the study was to elucidate the vasodilatory response to local heating of the skin at two depths in two locations. To accomplish this, we measured skin blood flow in 12 healthy subjects using laser Doppler perfusion monitoring. A probe with two fibers separated 0.14 mm (superficial) and 0.25 mm (deeper) from the illuminating fiber was first attached to the distal phalanx of the index finger and thereafter to the dorsal forearm skin. Local heating was caused with a thermostatic probe holder set at 40 degrees C. We studied the perfusion value and its two components, velocity and concentration. All registrations were also subjected to frequency analysis. Laser Doppler values were generally higher in the fingertip than in forearm skin. Heating caused increased values at both locations. Concentration increased relatively more than velocity and this was most obvious in the forearm. There were only slight differences in response between superficial and deeper vascular components. Frequency analysis revealed a peak in perfusion and velocity obviously related to the heartbeat. Movement of the column of blood thus reached the peripheral vascular network without changing concentration. We conclude that local heating increases skin blood flow in fingertip and forearm skin by different adjustments of blood cell concentration and velocity, presumably depending on differing vascular anatomy and physiological control, but differences are of a rather minor character. Furthermore, responses differ just slightly in superficial compartments as probed with fibers separated up to 0.25 mm.