Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
2.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(11): 2069-2074, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30105621

ABSTRACT

A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted to gather information on current microbiological practices for active surveillance of carriage of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in hospitals from 14 health departments of the Autonomous Community of Valencia (ACV), Spain, which together provided medical attention to 3,271,077 inhabitants in 2017, approximately 70% of the population of the ACV. The survey consisted of 35 questions on MDR bacteria screening policies, surveillance approach chosen (universal vs. targeted), and microbiological methods and processes in use for routine detection and reporting of colonization by MDR bacteria, including the anatomical sites scheduled to be sampled for each MDR bacterial species, and the methodology employed (culture-based, molecular-based, or both). Our study revealed striking differences across centers, likely attributable to the lack of consensus on optimal protocols for sampling, body sites for screening, and microbiological testing, thus underscoring the need for consensus guidelines on these issues.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Hospitals, Community , Bacterial Infections/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Geography , Humans , Public Health Surveillance , Spain/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 92(8): 3095-101, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17536000

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: GH treatment is effective in children born small for gestational age (SGA); however, its effectiveness and safety in very young SGA children is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze the outcome of very young SGA children treated with GH and followed for 2 yr. The results after 24 months of treatment, compared with a control group without treatment during 12 months followed by 12 months of treatment, are shown. DESIGN: We performed a multicenter, controlled, randomized, open trial. SETTINGS: The pediatric endocrinology departments of 14 public hospitals in Spain participated in the study. PATIENTS: Seventy-six children, aged 2-5 yr born SGA and without catch-up growth, were studied. INTERVENTION: Children received GH at 0.06 mg/kg.d for 2 yr (group I) or were followed for 12 months with no treatment and then treated for 12 months (group II). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age, general health status, pubertal stage, bone age, height, weight, biochemical and hormonal analyses, and adverse side effects were determined at biannual check-ups. RESULTS: The mean height sd score gain for chronological age in children treated for 24 months (group I) was 2.10, whereas in those treated only during the last 12 months (group II) was 1.43. In both groups, children under 4 yr of age had the greatest gain in growth velocity. No significant acceleration of bone age or side effects related to treatment was seen. CONCLUSION: Very young SGA children without spontaneous catch-up growth could benefit from GH treatment because growth was accelerated and no negative side effects were observed.


Subject(s)
Growth Hormone/therapeutic use , Growth/drug effects , Infant, Small for Gestational Age/growth & development , Age Determination by Skeleton , Anthropometry , Body Height/drug effects , Body Mass Index , Child, Preschool , Female , Growth Hormone/administration & dosage , Growth Hormone/adverse effects , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 3/metabolism , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/metabolism , Male , Parents
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...