Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Proteins ; 88(8): 1050-1054, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994784

ABSTRACT

We report docking performance on the six targets of Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions (CAPRI) rounds 39-45 that involved heteromeric protein-protein interactions and had the solved structures released since the rounds were held. Our general strategy involved protein-protein docking using ZDOCK, reranking using IRAD, and structural refinement using Rosetta. In addition, we made extensive use of experimental data to guide our docking runs. All the experimental information at the amino-acid level proved correct. However, for two targets, we also used protein-complex structures as templates for modeling interfaces. These resulted in incorrect predictions, presumably due to the low sequence identity between the targets and templates. Albeit a small number of targets, the performance described here compared somewhat less favorably with our previous CAPRI reports, which may be due to the CAPRI targets being increasingly challenging.


Subject(s)
Molecular Docking Simulation , Peptides/chemistry , Proteins/chemistry , Software , Amino Acid Sequence , Binding Sites , Humans , Ligands , Peptides/metabolism , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical , Protein Conformation, beta-Strand , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , Protein Interaction Mapping , Protein Multimerization , Proteins/metabolism , Research Design , Structural Homology, Protein
2.
Proteins ; 85(3): 408-416, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27718275

ABSTRACT

We report the performance of our protein-protein docking pipeline, including the ZDOCK rigid-body docking algorithm, on 19 targets in CAPRI rounds 28-34. Following the docking step, we reranked the ZDOCK predictions using the IRAD scoring function, pruned redundant predictions, performed energy landscape analysis, and utilized our interface prediction approach RCF. In addition, we applied constraints to the search space based on biological information that we culled from the literature, which increased the chance of making a correct prediction. For all but two targets we were able to find and apply biological information and we found the information to be highly accurate, indicating that effective incorporation of biological information is an important component for protein-protein docking. Proteins 2017; 85:408-416. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Computational Biology/methods , Molecular Docking Simulation/methods , Proteins/chemistry , Benchmarking , Binding Sites , Cluster Analysis , Databases, Protein , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation , Protein Interaction Mapping , Research Design , Software , Structural Homology, Protein , Thermodynamics
3.
Proteins ; 84 Suppl 1: 323-48, 2016 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27122118

ABSTRACT

We present the results for CAPRI Round 30, the first joint CASP-CAPRI experiment, which brought together experts from the protein structure prediction and protein-protein docking communities. The Round comprised 25 targets from amongst those submitted for the CASP11 prediction experiment of 2014. The targets included mostly homodimers, a few homotetramers, and two heterodimers, and comprised protein chains that could readily be modeled using templates from the Protein Data Bank. On average 24 CAPRI groups and 7 CASP groups submitted docking predictions for each target, and 12 CAPRI groups per target participated in the CAPRI scoring experiment. In total more than 9500 models were assessed against the 3D structures of the corresponding target complexes. Results show that the prediction of homodimer assemblies by homology modeling techniques and docking calculations is quite successful for targets featuring large enough subunit interfaces to represent stable associations. Targets with ambiguous or inaccurate oligomeric state assignments, often featuring crystal contact-sized interfaces, represented a confounding factor. For those, a much poorer prediction performance was achieved, while nonetheless often providing helpful clues on the correct oligomeric state of the protein. The prediction performance was very poor for genuine tetrameric targets, where the inaccuracy of the homology-built subunit models and the smaller pair-wise interfaces severely limited the ability to derive the correct assembly mode. Our analysis also shows that docking procedures tend to perform better than standard homology modeling techniques and that highly accurate models of the protein components are not always required to identify their association modes with acceptable accuracy. Proteins 2016; 84(Suppl 1):323-348. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology/statistics & numerical data , Models, Statistical , Molecular Docking Simulation , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Proteins/chemistry , Software , Algorithms , Amino Acid Motifs , Bacteria/chemistry , Binding Sites , Computational Biology/methods , Humans , International Cooperation , Internet , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation, alpha-Helical , Protein Conformation, beta-Strand , Protein Folding , Protein Interaction Domains and Motifs , Protein Multimerization , Protein Structure, Tertiary , Sequence Homology, Amino Acid , Thermodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...