Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 19(3)2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28294487

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal length of cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in lung transplantation according to CMV serostatus is not well established. METHODS: We have performed a prospective, observational, multicenter study to determine the incidence of CMV infection and disease in 92 CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipients (LTR), their related outcomes and risk factors, and the impact of prophylaxis length. RESULTS: At 18 months post transplantation, 37 patients (40%) developed CMV infection (23 [25%]) or disease (14 [15.2%]). Overall mortality was higher in patients with CMV disease (64.3% vs 10.2%; P<.001), but only one patient died from CMV disease. In the multivariate analysis, CMV disease was an independent death risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 18.214, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.120-80.527; P<.001). CMV disease incidence was higher in patients with 90-day prophylaxis than in those with 180-day prophylaxis (31.3% vs 11.8%; P=.049). Prophylaxis length was an independent risk factor for CMV disease (OR 4.974, 95% CI 1.231-20.094; P=.024). Sixteen patients withdrew from prophylaxis because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: CMV infection and disease in CMV-seropositive LTR remain frequent despite current prophylaxis. CMV disease increases mortality, whereas 180-day prophylaxis reduces the incidence of CMV disease.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Cytomegalovirus Infections/epidemiology , Cytomegalovirus Infections/prevention & control , Cytomegalovirus/isolation & purification , Lung Diseases/surgery , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , Adult , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Cytomegalovirus Infections/blood , Cytomegalovirus Infections/virology , Female , Ganciclovir/analogs & derivatives , Ganciclovir/therapeutic use , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/prevention & control , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/adverse effects , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Incidence , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Diseases/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Serologic Tests , Time Factors , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data , Valganciclovir , Young Adult
2.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 49(2): 70-78, feb. 2013. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-109515

ABSTRACT

El Registro Español de Trasplante Pulmonar (RETP) inició su actividad en 2006, participando en él todos los equipos de trasplante pulmonar (TP) con un programa activo en España. Este informe presenta por primera vez de forma global la descripción y resultados de los pacientes trasplantados de pulmón en España entre los años 2006 y 2010. La actividad de TP ha ido en progresivo aumento, trasplantándose en este periodo 951 adultos y 31 niños. La media de edad del receptor fue de 48,2 años, siendo 41,7 años en el donante pulmonar. En el TP adulto, la causa más frecuente de trasplante fue el enfisema/EPOC, seguido de la fibrosis pulmonar idiopática, representando ambas más del 60% del total de las indicaciones. La probabilidad de supervivencia tras el TP adulto a uno y 3 años es del 72 y del 60%, respectivamente, si bien en los pacientes que sobreviven al tercer mes postrasplante estas supervivencias son del 89,7 y del 75,2%. Los factores que más claramente inciden en la supervivencia del paciente son la edad del receptor y el diagnóstico que indicó el trasplante. En los trasplantes pediátricos, la fibrosis quística es la principal causa de trasplante (68%), y la supervivencia al año es del 80, y del 70% a los 3 años. Tanto en el trasplante adulto como en el pediátrico, la causa más frecuente de fallecimiento es la infección. Estos datos confirman la consolidación del TP en España como una opción terapéutica para la enfermedad respiratoria crónica avanzada, tanto en niños como en adultos(AU)


The Spanish Lung Transplant Registry (SLTR) began its activities in 2006 with the participation of all the lung transplantation (LT) groups with active programs in Spain. This report presents for the first time an overall description and results of the patients who received lung transplants in Spain from 2006 to 2010. LT activity has grown progressively, and in this time period 951 adults and 31 children underwent lung transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 48.2, while the mean age among the lung donors was 41.7. In adult LT, the most frequent cause for lung transplantation was emphysema/COPD, followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, both representing more than 60% the total number of indications. The probability for survival after adult LT to one and three years was 72% and 60%, respectively, although in patients who survived until the third month post-transplantation, these survival rates reached 89.7% and 75.2%. The factors that most clearly influenced patient survival were the age of the recipient and the diagnosis that indicated the transplantation. Among the pediatric transplantations, cystic fibrosis was the main cause for transplantation (68%), with a one-year survival of 80% and a three-year survival of 70%. In adult as well as pediatric transplantations, the most frequent cause of death was infection. These data confirm the consolidated situation of LT in Spain as a therapeutic option for advanced chronic respiratory disease, both in children as well as in adults(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Lung Transplantation/methods , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Lung Transplantation , Emphysema/complications , Emphysema/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Immune Tolerance/physiology , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Graft Survival/physiology , Survivorship/physiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Tissue Donors , Living Donors/statistics & numerical data
3.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 49(2): 70-8, 2013 Feb.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22939738

ABSTRACT

The Spanish Lung Transplant Registry (SLTR) began its activities in 2006 with the participation of all the lung transplantation (LT) groups with active programs in Spain. This report presents for the first time an overall description and results of the patients who received lung transplants in Spain from 2006 to 2010. LT activity has grown progressively, and in this time period 951 adults and 31 children underwent lung transplantation. The mean age of the recipients was 48.2, while the mean age among the lung donors was 41.7. In adult LT, the most frequent cause for lung transplantation was emphysema/COPD, followed by idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, both representing more than 60% the total number of indications. The probability for survival after adult LT to one and three years was 72% and 60%, respectively, although in patients who survived until the third month post-transplantation, these survival rates reached 89.7% and 75.2%. The factors that most clearly influenced patient survival were the age of the recipient and the diagnosis that indicated the transplantation. Among the pediatric transplantations, cystic fibrosis was the main cause for transplantation (68%), with a one-year survival of 80% and a three-year survival of 70%. In adult as well as pediatric transplantations, the most frequent cause of death was infection. These data confirm the consolidated situation of LT in Spain as a therapeutic option for advanced chronic respiratory disease, both in children as well as in adults.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation , Registries , Adolescent , Adult , Cause of Death , Emphysema/surgery , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Heart-Lung Transplantation/mortality , Heart-Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Immunosuppression Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Lung Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/epidemiology , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/etiology , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Proportional Hazards Models , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/surgery , Pulmonary Fibrosis/surgery , Respiration Disorders/surgery , Risk Factors , Spain , Tissue Donors/statistics & numerical data , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/statistics & numerical data
4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 39(1): 120-6, 2011 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20558077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The video-assisted thoracoscopic approach (video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS)) to lobectomy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is not standardised. Although three to four incisions are usually made, with the right surgical technique, the operation can be successfully carried out using only two incisions. We have analysed retrospectively, the characteristics and postoperative evolution of patients undergoing VATS lobectomies using two ports. METHODS: From June 2007 to November 2009, we carried out 131 major pulmonary resections by VATS, of which 40 (February 2009 to November 2009) were realised using only two incisions: one 1-cm incision through the 7th/8th intercostal space in the mid-axillary line, and a 3-5-cm anterior utility incision in the 5th intercostal space. The patients' mean age was 60.8±11.4 years (75% male, 25% female). RESULTS: The conversion rate was 10% (four patients). Of the remaining 36 cases, the diagnosis in six patients was benign, and in four was metastatic disease. Of the 26 cases with NSCLC, the most frequent stage was that of interactive application (IA) (58%) and histology mostly revealed adenocarcinoma (33%). Mean duration of surgery in the 36 resections completed by VATS was 168.6±54.0 min (range 80-300 min). The median chest tube duration was 2.5 days and the median length of stay in hospital was 3 days. There was no perioperative mortality in completed VATS cases, and no patient needed to be re-operated. Those patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) needed longer hospital stays (p=0.046). Similarly, extreme cases of adhesion during surgery needed more days of thoracic drainage (p=0.040) and longer hospital stays (p=0.011), as well as displaying a higher percentage of postoperative complications (p=0.008). If the group of patients is divided in two periods (February to July 2009 and August to November 2009), more extended lymphadenectomies are observed among those performed during the latter period. CONCLUSIONS: VATS lobectomy with two incisions is a safe and reliable procedure producing good postoperative results. As we obtain more experience over time, results improve, especially in the performance of more extended lymphadenectomies.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chest Tubes , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonectomy/adverse effects , Pneumonectomy/methods , Postoperative Care/methods , Retrospective Studies , Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Arch Bronconeumol ; 42(6): 267-72, 2006 Jun.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16827974

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This article describes the methods and conclusions of the first Spanish benchmarking study of thoracic surgery. The proposed aims were to describe cases of lung resection in 9 Spanish hospitals, compare indicators of quality among the 9 participating centers, and identify and propose common areas where lung-resection processes could be improved. METHODS: Information was taken from the minimum basic data set for lobectomy and pneumonectomy processes performed in 2002 and 2003. The chosen outcome indicators were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge, adjusted according to surgical complexity. Once the results had been analyzed, the participating centers with best outcomes were identified and a variety of proposed improvements were discussed. RESULTS: A total of 1666 procedures (1276 lobectomies and 390 pneumectomies) were studied. We found differences in mean length of stay, mortality, readmission rate, and morbidity that identified centers with lower mortality or shorter hospital stay for comparable or more complex surgical procedures. However, higher morbidity and readmission rates were found in these centers. CONCLUSIONS: Measures were proposed to ensure that relevant diagnostic information is recorded on discharge. It was also proposed to reduce unnecessarily long hospital stays and to standardize the procedures. With such an approach, reliable criteria that improve the quality of lung-resection processes can be established in the future.


Subject(s)
Benchmarking , Pneumonectomy/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Humans , Pilot Projects , Spain
6.
Arch. bronconeumol. (Ed. impr.) ; 42(6): 267-272, jun. 2006. ilus
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-046335

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: En el presente artículo se describen los métodos y las conclusiones del primer estudio español de benchmarking en cirugía torácica. Los objetivos propuestos fueron: describir la casuística de resección pulmonar desarrollada en 9 hospitales españoles, comparar indicadores de calidad entre los 9 centros participantes e identificar y proponer áreas de mejora comunes para los procesos de resección pulmonar. Métodos: Se utilizó como fuente de información el conjunto mínimo básico de datos de los años 2002 y 2003 de los procesos de lobectomía o neumonectomía. Los indicadores de resultados seleccionados fueron: mortalidad hospitalaria, morbilidad, estancia y readmisiones urgentes en los 30 días siguientes al alta, ajustadas por complejidad de los casos. Una vez presentados los resultados entre los participantes, se identificaron las unidades con mejores resultados y se discutieron diversas propuestas de mejora. Resultados: Se ha estudiado un total de 1.666 procedimientos (1.276 lobectomías y 390 neumonectomías). Se detectaron diferencias en estancia media, mortalidad, tasa de readmisiones y morbilidad, que permitieron identificar unidades, de complejidad equiparable o superior, con baja mortalidad y estancia. Sin embargo, en estas unidades se apreciaron tasas de morbilidad y readmisión más elevadas. Conclusiones: Se propusieron medidas encaminadas a registrar todos los diagnósticos relevantes en los informes de alta, disminuir las estancias inadecuadas y estandarizar los procedimientos que permitirán en el futuro establecer criterios fiables para mejorar la calidad de los procesos de resección pulmonar


Objective: This article describes the methods and conclusions of the first Spanish benchmarking study of thoracic surgery. The proposed aims were to describe cases of lung resection in 9 Spanish hospitals, compare indicators of quality among the 9 participating centers, and identify and propose common areas where lung-resection processes could be improved. Methods: Information was taken from the minimum basic data set for lobectomy and pneumonectomy processes performed in 2002 and 2003. The chosen outcome indicators were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, length of hospital stay, and emergency readmissions within 30 days of discharge, adjusted according to surgical complexity. Once the results had been analyzed, the participating centers with best outcomes were identified and a variety of proposed improvements were discussed. Results: A total of 1666 procedures (1276 lobectomies and 390 pneumectomies) were studied. We found differences in mean length of stay, mortality, readmission rate, and morbidity that identified centers with lower mortality or shorter hospital stay for comparable or more complex surgical procedures. However, higher morbidity and readmission rates were found in these centers. Conclusions: Measures were proposed to ensure that relevant diagnostic information is recorded on discharge. It was also proposed to reduce unnecessarily long hospital stays and to standardize the procedures. With such an approach, reliable criteria that improve the quality of lung-resection processes can be established in the future


Subject(s)
Humans , Thoracic Surgery/organization & administration , Thoracic Surgical Procedures/methods , Benchmarking/methods , Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration , Pneumonectomy/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...