Radiofrequency venous ablation for symptomatic relief in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: a case series.

Background: Hypovolemic postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is thought to be caused by dysregulated circulating blood volume. Management is mainly limited to symptom-targeted lifestyle changes. Radiofrequency venous ablation (RFA) represents a minimally invasive method of increasing circulating blood volume. The following case series describes a novel application of RFA to successfully target POTS symptoms in patients demonstrating venous insufficiency. The use of RFA in alleviating POTS symptoms has not previously been reported. Case summary: We describe four patients with either a well-established historical POTS diagnosis or dysautonomia symptoms refractory to both medical management and lifestyle modifications. They all demonstrated venous reflux on lower extremity venous ultrasound testing. Upon vascular surgery referral, all underwent great and small saphenous vein RFA. They each subsequently reported subjective improvement in their dysautonomia symptoms and quality-of-life. Two with symptom recurrence years later were found to have new-onset pelvic venous congestion and are being evaluated for pelvic venous insufficiency interventions. Discussion: Lower extremity venous pooling can exacerbate dysautonomia symptoms in POTS patients. Patients refractory to conventional treatment strategies should undergo venous insufficiency workup, and if positive, should be referred for venous pooling intervention evaluation. The success of RFA at treating refractory POTS symptoms in these four patients with lower extremity venous reflux, including no surgical intervention and no adverse effects, are compelling grounds to further explore this therapy and to quantify and standardize symptom improvement assessment in a larger patient population. Future directions include a demonstration of quality-of-life improvement in randomized clinical trials.

Redefining the Roles of Aspirin across the Spectrum of Cardiovascular Disease Prevention.

Even before its role in platelet inhibition was fully characterized in the 1980s, aspirin had been incorporated into the cardiovascular disease care algorithm. Early trials examining its use in unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction revealed evidence of its protective role in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Large trials assessing use in the primary prevention setting and optimal dosing regimens were studied in the late 1990s and early 2000s. As a cornerstone of cardiovascular care, aspirin was incorporated into primary and secondary ASCVD prevention guidelines in the United States and mechanical heart valve guidelines. However, in recent years, with significant advances in medical and interventional ASCVD therapies, scrutiny has been placed on the bleeding profile of aspirin, and guidelines have adapted to new evidence. Updates in primary prevention guidelines reserve aspirin only for patients at higher ASCVD risk and low bleeding risk - though questions remain in ASCVD risk assessment as risk-enhancing factors have proven difficult to incorporate on a population level. New thoughts regarding aspirin use in secondary prevention - especially with the concomitant use of anticoagulants - have altered recommendations as additional data accrued. Finally, a recommendation for aspirin and vitamin K antagonists with mechanical heart valves has been modified. Despite aspirin losing a foothold in cardiovascular care, new evidence has strengthened claims for its use in women at high risk for preeclampsia.

Risk-adapted chemoimmunotherapy using brentuximab vedotin and rituximab in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma: a phase II, non-randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cure rates for Hodgkin's lymphoma are excellent, but excess short-term and long-term morbidities from treatment remain a concern. Immunotherapy targeting both tumor antigens and the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in children, adolescents, and young adults with Hodgkin's lymphoma may improve early response rates and eliminate toxic chemotherapy and radiation, thus minimizing toxicity. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the safety and overall response rate of brentuximab vedotin and rituximab in combination with risk-adapted chemotherapy in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed classic Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL). METHODS: This is a prospective, phase II, non-randomized, risk-assigned study. Patients were treated and evaluated between 2012 and 2020. Eligible patients were aged ≥1 and ≤30 years old with advanced stage, intermediate-risk, and high-risk newly diagnosed cHL. Patients received four or six cycles of brentuximab vedotin (1.2 mg/kg), doxorubicin (25 mg/m2), vinblastine (6 mg/m2), dacarbazine (375 mg/m2), and rituximab (375 mg/m2). Early response was evaluated following two cycles of therapy. Involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) was restricted to high-risk patients with both bulky disease and slow response or those not in complete response at the end of chemoimmunotherapy. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled, with a median age of 15 years (4-23). There were 18 intermediate-risk and 12 high-risk patients. Toxicities included grade III mucositis (3%), infusion reaction (3%), and peripheral neuropathy (6%). There was a 100% complete response rate on completion of chemoimmunotherapy. Eighteen patients (60%) achieved a rapid early response. Four patients (13%) required IFRT. The 5-year event-free and overall survival rates were 100%, with a median follow-up of 62 months (18-105). CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy with brentuximab vedotin, rituximab, and risk-adapted chemotherapy is safe in children, adolescents, and young adults with newly diagnosed cHL. We have demonstrated 100% complete response and 100% event-free and overall survival rates at a median 5-year follow-up, with a significant reduction in use of more toxic chemotherapy and IFRT. A larger cohort is required to confirm these preliminary findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02398240.