Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 38(4): 201-212, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31145167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Pain, Agitation, and Delirium guidelines influenced practice to support targeted, light sedation for the mechanically ventilated patient. This practice is associated with improved clinical outcomes, but it remains unclear how it impacts the patient experience. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the pervasive patient experience components and how the experience may have been influenced by targeted, light sedation practices. METHODS: A prospective observational study using mixed methodology and a convenience sample was conducted after institutional review board approval was obtained. Inclusion criteria were the following: acute mechanical ventilation of less than 14 days, 18 years or older and able to provide consent, English speaking, and delirium-free. Exclusion criteria were the presence of delirium or intravenous opioids/sedatives within 24 hours prior to the interview. The quantitative component included simple yes or no questions and identification of quantitative adjectives describing the mechanical ventilation experience. Every 10th patient was invited to participate in an expanded qualitative interview. RESULTS: Data were collected for 12 months with a total sample size of 130 patients participating in the quantitative component and a subset of 15 patients also participating in the qualitative interview. Sixty percent of the total sample consisted of cardiothoracic surgery patients, and 40% were mixed intensive care unit patient populations. Descriptive statistics include the following averaged values: Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale scores -1.7 throughout mechanical ventilation, aged 59.9 years, days mechanically ventilated 1.4, intensive care unit length of stay 4.6 days, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 16.1. The most significant finding was that 56.2% of patients who could not communicate reported feeling afraid, whereas 32.5% of those who could communicate reported feeling afraid (P < .027). The themes identified in the qualitative component of the study reinforced these quantitative findings; 10 of the 15 patients interviewed reported experiencing fear, and all of the patients reported issues with communication. DISCUSSION: The clinical implications of this research study primarily affect critical care nursing. Changes in nursing practice can address these findings to improve and more effectively acknowledge the patient experience.


Subject(s)
Emotions , Patients/psychology , Respiration, Artificial/psychology , APACHE , Adult , Communication , Fear/psychology , Female , Humans , Loneliness/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Qualitative Research , Surveys and Questionnaires
2.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 34(6): 348-55, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26436301

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Progressive mobility (PM) is a clinical intervention that influences complications experienced throughout critical illness. Early PM is a relevant topic in critical care practice literature and was principle to introducing a PM care guideline in an acute cardiothoracic/cardiovascular intensive care unit. PURPOSE: A noted challenge in the cardiothoracic/cardiovascular intensive care unit is caring for acute cardiac and pulmonary failure. Often, these patients require prolonged mechanical circulatory support via extracorporeal mechanical oxygenation or a ventricular assist device. This article describes safe and effective progressive mobilization for patients experiencing MCS in a case study format. This article also highlights how a multidisciplinary clinical team supports mobility practice in specific critical care roles. CONCLUSIONS: Post-intensive care syndrome is composed of various health implications that occur following critical illness. Recent data suggest improved care outcomes when critically ill patients are awake and participate in active physical rehabilitation as early as clinically possible. The case studies presented indicate that mobility, to the point of ambulation, is a feasible clinical expectation when patients present with substantial acute respiratory and cardiac failure and are managed with MCS. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Development of a PM guideline uses a critical appraisal of practice evidence, highlights multidisciplinary collaboration, and increases progression to ambulation. Mobility for complex patients is attainable, as demonstrated in the postguideline outcomes. The PM guideline provides structure to primary caregivers and promotes safe practices. The PM guideline facilitates an advanced level of care, promotes safe practices, champions holistic recovery, and encourages active patient involvement, goals satisfying to both patients and staff.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Critical Care , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/rehabilitation , Heart Failure/therapy , Heart-Assist Devices , Intensive Care Units , Respiratory Insufficiency/therapy , Adult , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physical Therapy Modalities , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Nurses Prof Dev ; 31(4): 203-10, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26200300

ABSTRACT

In 2014, newly graduated nurses are welcomed and recruited to practice in critical care, and hiring trends in hospitals support a demand for newly graduated nurses. At a 501-bed, quaternary care, academic medical center located in the Rocky Mountain region, an orientation program was formalized to prepare newly graduated nurses for critical care practice. The critical care clinical orientation program presented utilizes a dynamic approach that includes didactic study, case study integration, a clinical staging program, active preceptor development, and care-based simulation exercises. The purpose of this article is to describe the clinical orientation program developed in critical care, which augments an accredited New Graduate Nurse Residency Program.


Subject(s)
Critical Care , Inservice Training , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Humans , Preceptorship , Program Development , Staff Development
4.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 24(3): 443-56, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22920468

ABSTRACT

Approaches to mechanical ventilation (MV) are consistently changing and the level of ventilator sophistication provides opportunities to improve pulmonary support for critically ill patients. Advanced MV modes are used in the treatment of patients with complex pulmonary conditions. To achieve optimal patient outcomes MV modes that best meet the needs of patient's evolving pulmonary conditions are necessary. It's essential for nurses to integrate pulmonary MV knowledge in the care of critically ill patients. The purpose of this article is to describe the evidence supporting lung protective modes of MV used in the care of critically ill adults.


Subject(s)
Respiration, Artificial/methods , Adult , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Respiration, Artificial/nursing , Tidal Volume , Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...