Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?

Scholarly communication in science, technology, and medicine has been organized around journal-based scientific publishing for the past 350 years. Scientific publishing has unique business models and includes stakeholders with conflicting interests-publishers, funders, libraries, and scholars who create, curate, and consume the literature. Massive growth and change in scholarly communication, coinciding with digitalization, have amplified stresses inherent in traditional scientific publishing, as evidenced by overwhelmed editors and reviewers, increased retraction rates, emergence of pseudo-journals, strained library budgets, and debates about the metrics of academic recognition for scholarly achievements. Simultaneously, several open access models are gaining traction and online technologies offer opportunities to augment traditional tasks of scientific publishing, develop integrated discovery services, and establish global and equitable scholarly communication through crowdsourcing, software development, big data management, and machine learning. These rapidly evolving developments raise financial, legal, and ethical dilemmas that require solutions, while successful strategies are difficult to predict. Key challenges and trends are reviewed from the authors' perspective about how to engage the scholarly community in this multifaceted process.

The Impact of Resident Duty Hour and Supervision Changes: A Review.

In 2003 and again in 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) instituted increasingly stringent requirements governing resident hours and supervision, with the goals of improving patient safety, resident well-being, and resident education. Although the changes initially stemmed from a catastrophic outcome in a patient treated with psychotropic medications and behavioral restraints, and have been in place over a decade, many psychiatrists are not familiar with these changes and with their potential effects and "side effects" on today's trainees and faculty. The authors review the history leading to these changes, summarize the revised requirements, and review representative literature regarding the impact of the changes. The existing studies of the impact of the new requirements on improving patient safety, resident well-being, and resident education are inconclusive, and most editorials, perspectives, and surveys of faculty and residents reflect a lack of enthusiasm for the changes. They go on to suggest the need for evidence-based outcome studies prior to the institution of further major changes in ACGME requirements.

The Education Review Board: A Mechanism for Managing Potential Conflicts of Interest in Medical Education.

Concerns about the influence of industry support on medical education, research, and patient care have increased in both medical and political circles. Some academic medical centers, questioning whether industry support of medical education could be appropriate and not a conflict of interest, banned such support. In 2009, a Partners HealthCare System commission concluded that interactions with industry remained important to Partners' charitable academic mission and made recommendations to transparently manage such relationships. An Education Review Board (ERB) was created to oversee and manage all industry support of Partners educational activities.Using a case review method, the ERB developed guidelines to implement the commission's recommendations. A multi-funder rule was established that prohibits industry support from only one company for any Partners educational activity. Within that framework, the ERB established guidelines on industry support of educational conferences, clinical fellowships, and trainees' expenses for attending external educational programs; gifts of textbooks and other educational materials; promotional opportunities associated with Partners educational activities; Partners educational activities under contract with an industry entity; and industry-run programs using Partners resources.Although many changes have resulted from the implementation of the ERB guidelines, the number of industry grants for Partners educational activities has remained relatively stable, and funding for these activities declined only moderately during the first three full calendar years (2011-2013) of ERB oversight. The ERB continually educates both the Partners community and industry about the rationale for its guidelines and its openness to their refinement in response to changes in the external environment.

Focused opportunities for resident education on today's inpatient psychiatric units.

The functions and nature of inpatient psychiatric units have changed dramatically over recent decades, as has the role of psychiatric residents on these units. Nonetheless, clinical rotations on inpatient psychiatry remain as core clinical experiences in psychiatric residency. This column reviews the key changes in the residents' inpatient experience and articulates appropriate educational goals for current inpatient rotations in the areas of the psychiatric interview, diagnosis and formulation, treatment planning, working as a member of a multidisciplinary team, and working with acutely ill and involuntary patients.

The development, implementation, and assessment of an innovative faculty mentoring leadership program.

Effective mentoring is an important component of academic success. Few programs exist to both improve the effectiveness of established mentors and cultivate a multispecialty mentoring community. In 2008, in response to a faculty survey on mentoring, leaders at Brigham and Women's Hospital developed the Faculty Mentoring Leadership Program as a peer learning experience for midcareer and senior faculty physician and scientist mentors to enhance their skills and leadership in mentoring and create a supportive community of mentors. A planning group representing key administrative, educational, clinical, and research mentorship constituencies designed the nine-month course.Participants met monthly for an hour and a half during lunchtime. Two cofacilitators engaged the diverse group of 16 participants in interactive discussions about cases based on the participants' experiences. While the cofacilitators discussed with the participants the dyadic mentor-mentee relationship, they specifically emphasized the value of engaging multiple mentors and establishing mentoring networks. In response to postsession and postcourse (both immediately and after six months) self-assessments, participants reported substantive gains in their mentoring confidence and effectiveness, experienced a renewed sense of enthusiasm for mentoring, and took initial steps to build a diverse network of mentoring relationships.In this article, the authors describe the rationale, design, implementation, assessment, and ongoing impact of this innovative faculty mentoring leadership program. They also share lessons learned for other institutions that are contemplating developing a similar faculty mentoring program.

Poor intentions or poor attention: misrepresentation by applicants to psychiatry residency.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the veracity of self-reported data by applicants to psychiatry residency. METHODS: The authors reviewed the reported publications of all applicants to a psychiatry residency training program over a 2-year span. RESULTS: Nine percent of applicants reporting publications were found to have misrepresented them. International medical graduates were found to be more likely to have misrepresented their publications than U.S. medical graduates. CONCLUSION: A small but significant number of applicants to psychiatry residency training misrepresent their publications. Identification of misrepresentation may provide valuable information about the applicant and their future performance in training and practice.

Getting our own house in order: improving psychiatry education to medical students as a prelude to medical school education reform.

OBJECTIVE: The authors summarize efforts to revitalize psychiatry teaching to medical students at Harvard Medical School (HMS) in advance of a major overhaul of the medical school curriculum. METHODS: This preliminary report chronicles key challenges and the organization of the reform effort within the departments of psychiatry affiliated with the medical school. RESULTS: Based upon a comprehensive internal review of psychiatric education at the medical school, the HMS Psychiatry Executive Committee and psychiatry faculty concluded that psychiatry teaching was underresourced and lacked cohesion and consistent standards and expectations across clinical sites involved in psychiatry teaching. Through a willingness to identify and vigorously address deficiencies in medical student education within a large decentralized program, psychiatry has earned a reputation as an effective reform agent at the medical school. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatry education improvements have strengthened our partnership with the medical school as it is undertaking major educational reform of its entire curriculum.

Predictors and outcomes of delirium.

OBJECTIVES: To determine factors associated with the occurrence of delirium among patients undergoing surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: The sample included all consenting patients who underwent AAA repair during a 12-month period. Before surgery, daily while in hospital, and at 1 and 6 months after surgery, we assessed patients' mood, mental status and functional status. We compared delirious and nondelirious patients for severity of preoperative depressive symptoms, length of hospital stay and mortality. The effects of delirium on postoperative functional status were assessed in conjunction with postoperative depressive symptoms using regression models. RESULTS: The sample of 35 patients was primarily male and elderly; one-quarter had three or more medical conditions; and eight (23%) developed delirium after surgery. Postoperative delirium was significantly associated with preoperative depressive symptoms, alcohol use and cognitive impairment as well as with longer lengths of stay and poorer functional status at 1 and 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Identification and treatment of patients with depressive symptoms, alcohol use and cognitive impairment prior to AAA surgery could reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium and the prolonged hospital stays and impaired functional status associated with it. Surgeons should consider using simple screening instruments before surgery to identify patients at risk and referring them for psychiatric evaluation and treatment. They should also consider including psychiatrists early in the care of high-risk patients to improve detection of and early intervention for delirium.

Nonspecific medication side effects and the nocebo phenomenon.

Patients taking active medications frequently experience adverse, nonspecific side effects that are not a direct result of the specific pharmacological action of the drug. Although this phenomenon is common, distressing, and costly, it is rarely studied and poorly understood. The nocebo phenomenon, in which placebos produce adverse side effects, offers some insight into nonspecific side effect reporting. We performed a focused review of the literature, which identified several factors that appear to be associated with the nocebo phenomenon and/or reporting of nonspecific side effects while taking active medication: the patient's expectations of adverse effects at the outset of treatment; a process of conditioning in which the patient learns from prior experiences to associate medication-taking with somatic symptoms; certain psychological characteristics such as anxiety, depression, and the tendency to somatize; and situational and contextual factors. Physicians and other health care personnel can attempt to ameliorate nonspecific side effects to active medications by identifying in advance those patients most at risk for developing them and by using a collaborative relationship with the patient to explain and help the patient to understand and tolerate these bothersome but nonharmful symptoms.