Evaluation of three physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling tools for emergency risk assessment after acute dichloromethane exposure.

INTRODUCTION: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models may be useful in emergency risk assessment, after acute exposure to chemicals, such as dichloromethane (DCM). We evaluated the applicability of three PBPK models for human risk assessment following a single exposure to DCM: one model is specifically developed for DCM (Bos) and the two others are semi-generic ones (Mumtaz and Jongeneelen). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assessed the accuracy of the models' predictions by simulating exposure data from a previous healthy volunteer study, in which six subjects had been exposed to DCM for 1h. The time-course of both the blood DCM concentration and percentage of carboxyhemoglobin (HbCO) were simulated. RESULTS: With all models, the shape of the simulated time course resembled the shape of the experimental data. For the end of the exposure, the predicted DCM blood concentration ranged between 1.52-4.19mg/L with the Bos model, 1.42-4.04mg/L with the Mumtaz model, and 1.81-4.31mg/L with the Jongeneelen model compared to 0.27-5.44mg/L in the experimental data. % HbCO could be predicted only with the Bos model. The maximum predicted % HbCO ranged between 3.1 and 4.2% compared to 0.4-2.3% in the experimental data. The % HbCO predictions were more in line with the experimental data after adjustment of the Bos model for the endogenous HbCO levels. CONCLUSIONS: The Bos Mumtaz and Jongeneelen PBPK models were able to simulate experimental DCM blood concentrations reasonably well. The Bos model appears to be useful for calculating HbCO concentrations in emergency risk assessment.

Acute toxicity of high concentrations of carbon dioxide in rats.

Subterranean storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) has been proposed to diminish atmospheric increases of this greenhouse gas. To contribute to risk assessment of accidental release associated with handling, transport and storage, rats were exposed to high concentrations (targets 40, 43 and 50 volume %) of CO2. The oxygen concentrations dropped as a result, but were not supplemented. For each concentration, pairs of animals were exposed for different exposure durations to derive an exposure concentration-duration relation in which mortality is described as a function of C(n)×t (probit relation). A very high "n" value for the probit function could be derived from the data obtained at 40% and 43% CO2, which indicates that for exposure durations longer than 30 min the LC50 decreases hardly with increasing exposure duration. Below 30 min the LC50 seemed to increase with decreasing exposure durations. The variability in the data of 43% and 50% CO2, however, did not allow to derive a meaningful value of "n".

Inhalation toxicity studies: OECD guidelines in relation to REACH and scientific developments.

The OECD Health Effects Test Guidelines (TGs) provide guidance concerning the use of methods for the identification and characterization of hazards from chemical substances. These TGs are largely based on tests in routine use for many years and are known to yield information relevant to various types of toxicity. They have proven their value in practice and will remain of paramount importance for decades to come. However, the TGs describe mostly animal assays, and there is an increasingly strong urge to reduce animal testing on ethical grounds. In addition, assessment procedures are generally considered too slow and too rigid, which has resulted in elaborate testing of a relatively small number of chemicals, while virtually nothing is known about the vast majority of compounds. The major objectives of Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) are to improve the knowledge about the properties and use of chemicals and to speed up the procedure of risk assessment. The REACH text contains information requirements that can be met by OECD TGs but REACH also provides rules for adaptation of the standard testing regime. Also, various components of "Intelligent Testing Strategies" are described in order to limit animal testing. This paper briefly describes the OECD TGs for inhalation toxicity studies, including those in preparation, and their role in future hazard identification. This will be discussed in relation to the evaluation of the safety of thousands of chemicals in a relatively short period of time and scientific developments, including the use of alternatives to animal testing.