A 3-year prospective study of the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lenses compared with frequent replacement and conventional daily wear contact lenses.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical performance of daily disposable contact lens wear compared to conventional daily wear contact lenses and frequent replacement contact lenses. METHODS: This 3-year prospective study was conducted in 12 U.S. practices. Of 338 eligible subjects enrolled (126 conventional daily wear, 144 frequent replacement, and 68 daily disposable), 229 subjects disposable group were compared with the conventional daily wear group and two sub-groups of frequent replacement subjects: (a) those with replacement at 2-weak intervals and (b) those with replacement at 1 or 3 months. RESULTS: Comparing the daily disposable and conventional daily wear groups, the daily disposable subjects were more likely to be asymptomatic, reported fewer symptoms of redness, cloudy vision and grittiness/dirty sensation, reported better vision and overall satisfaction, and had fewer lens surface deposits, complications, tarsal abnormalities, and unscheduled visits, while conventional daily wear subjects reported better lens handling. Comparing the daily disposable and frequent replacement (1/3 months) groups, daily disposable subjects reported fewer symptoms of foreign body sensation, redness, cloudy vision and grittiness/dirty sensation, reported better subjective vision, comfort and overall satisfaction, and has fewer lens surface deposits, complications, and tarsal abnormalities, while frequent replacement (1/3 months) subjects reported fewer dryness symptoms and better lens handling. Comparing the daily disposable and frequent replacement (2-weeks) groups, daily disposable subjects reported better subjective vision and overall satisfaction and had fewer lens surface deposits and tarsal abnormalities, while frequent replacement (2-weeks) subjects reported fewer photophobia symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that daily disposable wear may be the most trouble-free way of wearing contact lenses.

Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers.

BACKGROUND: RESULTS are reported for the first year of one facet of an ongoing multisite clinical investigation. In this article, one subpopulations of subjects wearing soft contact lenses on a daily disposable wear schedule (DDW is compared to a second subpopulation wearing lenses on a conventional daily wear (CDW) basis. METHODS: All subjects recruited were successfully wearing lenses on a conventional daily wear basis at the time of enrollment. In addition to an initial visit, follow-up visits occurred at 1, 4, 12, 26 and 52 weeks. Areas of assessment included vision, comfort, ocular health, subject-reported symptoms, lens surface deposits and overall satisfaction. A total of 70 subjects were dispensed lenses on a daily disposable schedule and 125 subjects were dispensed lenses on a conventional daily wear schedule. RESULTS: Five DDW subjects and 15 CDW subjects discontinued before the 52-week follow-up visit. When the findings of the 52-week follow-up visit were compared, the DDW group performed significantly better than the CDW group in the following areas: Snellen visual acuity, subjective vision and comfort assessment, symptomatology, lens deposits and overall satisfaction. In addition, while performance levels tended to improve in the DDW group when the results from the 52-week follow-up visit were compared with the 1-week follow-up visit, they tended to decline in the CDW group over this period of time. Subjects wearing lenses on a daily disposable basis were significantly less likely to report for an unscheduled visit than subjects wearing lenses on a conventional wear basis, with the DDW subjects reporting with less serious ocular health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who were wearing conventional reusable daily wear lenses and refit into lens wear on a daily disposable basis realized clinically significant advantages compared to a similar population of patients who were refit with lenses worn on a conventional daily wear basis.