Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Clin Microbiol ; 52(11): 4056-7, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25165081

ABSTRACT

We developed a pyrazinamidase gene DNA-sequencing method to rapidly identify pyrazinamide resistance-causing mutations in GenoLyse-treated, smear-positive sputum specimens. The sensitivity and specificity were 90.9 and 100%, respectively, compared to those of MGIT drug susceptibility testing, after the exclusion of synonymous mutations and nonsynonymous mutations previously associated with susceptibility to pyrazinamide.


Subject(s)
Amidohydrolases/genetics , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Genotyping Techniques/methods , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA/methods , Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Genotype , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Pyrazinamide/pharmacology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
2.
PLoS One ; 8(8): e70919, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24058399

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: South Africa shows one of the highest global burdens of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB). Since 2002, MDR-TB in South Africa has been treated by a standardized combination therapy, which until 2010 included ofloxacin, kanamycin, ethionamide, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. Since 2010, ethambutol has been replaced by cycloserine or terizidone. The effect of standardized treatment on the acquisition of XDR-TB is not currently known. METHODS: We genetically characterized a random sample of 4,667 patient isolates of drug-sensitive, MDR and XDR-TB cases collected from three South African provinces, namely, the Western Cape, Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal. Drug resistance patterns of a subset of isolates were analyzed for the presence of commonly observed resistance mutations. RESULTS: Our analyses revealed a strong association between distinct strain genotypes and the emergence of XDR-TB in three neighbouring provinces of South Africa. Strains predominant in XDR-TB increased in proportion by more than 20-fold from drug-sensitive to XDR-TB and accounted for up to 95% of the XDR-TB cases. A high degree of clustering for drug resistance mutation patterns was detected. For example, the largest cluster of XDR-TB associated strains in the Eastern Cape, affecting more than 40% of all MDR patients in this province, harboured identical mutations concurrently conferring resistance to isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, ethambutol, streptomycin, ethionamide, kanamycin, amikacin and capreomycin. CONCLUSIONS: XDR-TB associated genotypes in South Africa probably were programmatically selected as a result of the standard treatment regimen being ineffective in preventing their transmission. Our findings call for an immediate adaptation of standard treatment regimens for M/XDR-TB in South Africa.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/drug therapy , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/microbiology , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Antitubercular Agents/therapeutic use , Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Genotype , Humans , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , South Africa/epidemiology
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 50(3): 995-1002, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22170931

ABSTRACT

Genotyping of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated from tuberculosis (TB) patients in four South African provinces (Western Cape, Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and Gauteng) revealed a distinct population structure of the MDR strains in all four regions, despite the evidence of substantial human migration between these settings. In all analyzed provinces, a negative correlation between strain diversity and an increasing level of drug resistance (from MDR-TB to extensively drug-resistant TB [XDR-TB]) was observed. Strains predominating in XDR-TB in the Western and Eastern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal Provinces were strongly associated with harboring an inhA promoter mutation, potentially suggesting a role of these mutations in XDR-TB development in South Africa. Approximately 50% of XDR-TB cases detected in the Western Cape were due to strains probably originating from the Eastern Cape. This situation may illustrate how failure of efficient health care delivery in one setting can burden health clinics in other areas.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Biodiversity , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/classification , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/isolation & purification , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/microbiology , Bacterial Proteins , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology , Molecular Typing , Mutation , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Oxidoreductases , Promoter Regions, Genetic , South Africa
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 177(7): 787-92, 2008 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18202343

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: The dual challenges to tuberculosis (TB) control of HIV infection and multidrug resistance are particularly pressing in South Africa. Conventional methods for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug resistance take weeks to months to produce results. Rapid molecular testing for drug resistance is available but has not been implemented in high-TB-burden settings. OBJECTIVES: To assess the performance and feasibility of implementation of a commercially available molecular line-probe assay for rapid detection of rifampicin and isoniazid resistance. METHODS: We performed the assay directly on 536 consecutive smear-positive sputum specimens from patients at increased risk of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB in a busy routine diagnostic laboratory in Cape Town, South Africa. Results were compared with conventional liquid culture and drug susceptibility testing on solid medium. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Overall, 97% of smear-positive specimens gave interpretable results within 1-2 days using the molecular assay. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 98.9, 99.4, 97.9, and 99.7%, respectively, for detection of rifampicin resistance; 94.2, 99.7, 99.1, and 97.9%, respectively, for detection of isoniazid resistance; and 98.8, 100, 100, and 99.7%, respectively, for detection of multidrug resistance compared with conventional results. The assay also performed well on specimens that were contaminated on conventional culture and on smear-negative, culture-positive specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This molecular assay is a highly accurate screening tool for MDR TB, which achieves a substantial reduction in diagnostic delay. With overall performance characteristics that are superior to conventional culture and drug susceptibility testing and the possibility for high throughput with substantial cost savings, molecular testing has the potential to revolutionize MDR TB diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Antitubercular Agents/pharmacology , Isoniazid/pharmacology , Molecular Probe Techniques , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/drug effects , Rifampin/pharmacology , Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant/diagnosis , Genotype , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Mycobacterium tuberculosis/genetics , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Sensitivity and Specificity , South Africa , Sputum/microbiology , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...