Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neuroimage ; 54(1): 161-9, 2011 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20728543

ABSTRACT

Changes in brain structure occur in remote regions following focal damage such as stroke. Such changes could disrupt processing of information across widely distributed brain networks. We used diffusion MRI tractography to assess connectivity between brain regions in 9 chronic stroke patients and 18 age-matched controls. We applied complex network analysis to calculate 'communicability', a measure of the ease with which information can travel across a network. Clustering individuals based on communicability separated patient and control groups, not only in the lesioned hemisphere but also in the contralesional hemisphere, despite the absence of gross structural pathology in the latter. In our highly selected patient group, lesions were localised to the left basal ganglia/internal capsule. We found reduced communicability in patients in regions surrounding the lesions in the affected hemisphere. In addition, communicability was reduced in homologous locations in the contralesional hemisphere for a subset of these regions. We interpret this as evidence for secondary degeneration of fibre pathways which occurs in remote regions interconnected, directly or indirectly, with the area of primary damage. We also identified regions with increased communicability in patients that could represent adaptive, plastic changes post-stroke. Network analysis provides new and powerful tools for understanding subtle changes in interactions across widely distributed brain networks following stroke.


Subject(s)
Functional Laterality/physiology , Stroke/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brain/anatomy & histology , Brain/pathology , Brain/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Communication , Communication Disorders/etiology , Communication Disorders/pathology , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Net , Reference Values , Stroke/pathology , Stroke/psychology
2.
Neuroimage ; 42(2): 603-10, 2008 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18579411

ABSTRACT

With expanding potential clinical applications of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) it is important to test how reliable different measures of fMRI activation are between subjects and sessions and between centres. This study compared variability across 17 patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and 22 age-matched healthy controls (HC) in 5 European centres performing an fMRI block design with hand tapping. We recruited subjects from sites using 1.5 T scanners from different manufacturers. 5 healthy volunteers also were studied at each of 4 of the centres. We found that reproducibility between runs and sessions for single individuals was consistently much greater than between individuals. There was greater run-to-run variability for MS patients than for HC. Measurements of maximum signal change (MSC) appeared to provide higher reproducibility within individuals and greater sensitivity to differences between individuals than region of interest (ROI) suprathreshold voxel counts. The variability in measurements between centres was not as great as that between individuals. Consistent with these observations, we estimated that power should not be reduced substantially with use of multi-, as opposed to single-, centre study designs with similar numbers of subjects. Multi-centre interventional studies in which fMRI is used as an outcome measure thus appear practical even when implemented in conventional clinical environments.


Subject(s)
Brain Mapping/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Multiple Sclerosis/physiopathology , Somatosensory Cortex/physiopathology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Sclerosis/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...