Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Int J Cardiol ; 168(3): 2153-8, 2013 Oct 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23465250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The focus of the diagnostic process in chest pain patients at the emergency department is to identify both low and high risk patients for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The HEART score was designed to facilitate this process. This study is a prospective validation of the HEART score. METHODS: A total of 2440 unselected patients presented with chest pain at the cardiac emergency department of ten participating hospitals in The Netherlands. The HEART score was assessed as soon as the first lab results and ECG were obtained. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints were (i) the occurrence of AMI and death, (ii) ACS and (iii) the performance of a coronary angiogram. The performance of the HEART score was compared with the TIMI and GRACE scores. RESULTS: Low HEART scores (values 0-3) were calculated in 36.4% of the patients. MACE occurred in 1.7%. In patients with HEART scores 4-6, MACE was diagnosed in 16.6%. In patients with high HEART scores (values 7-10), MACE occurred in 50.1%. The c-statistic of the HEART score (0.83) is significantly higher than the c-statistic of TIMI (0.75)and GRACE (0.70) respectively (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The HEART score provides the clinician with a quick and reliable predictor of outcome, without computer-required calculating. Low HEART scores (0-3), exclude short-term MACE with >98% certainty. In these patients one might consider reserved policies. In patients with high HEART scores (7-10) the high risk of MACE may indicate more aggressive policies.


Subject(s)
Chest Pain/diagnosis , Coronary Angiography/methods , Electrocardiography , Emergency Service, Hospital , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Chest Pain/epidemiology , Chest Pain/etiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Survival Rate/trends
2.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 17(3): 429-35, 2003 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12562457

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have reported inhibitory effects of lactic acid bacteria on bacterial pathogens. AIM: To test whether a drink containing Lactobacillus casei strain Shirota inhibits Helicobacter pylori growth. METHODS: The in vitro growth inhibition of H. pylori was studied when L. casei was added to plates previously inoculated with H. pylori reference strain NCTC 11637. In an intervention study, 14 H. pylori-positive subjects were given Yakult drink (10(8) colony-forming units/mL L. casei) thrice daily during meals for 3 weeks. Six untreated H. pylori-positive subjects served as controls. H. pylori bacterial loads were determined using the 13C-urea breath test, which was performed before and 3 weeks after the start of L. casei supplementation. RESULTS: In vitro, L. casei inhibits H. pylori growth. This effect was stronger with L. casei grown in milk solution than in DeMan-Rogosa-Sharpe medium. No growth inhibition was shown with medium inoculated with lactic acid, Escherichia coli strain DH5alpha or uninoculated medium. Filtration of L. casei culture before incubation with H. pylori completely abolished the inhibitory effect. Urease activity decreased in nine of the 14 (64%) subjects with L. casei supplementation and in two of the six (33%) controls (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Viable L. casei are required for H. pylori growth inhibition. This does not result from changes in lactic acid concentration. In addition, a slight, but non-significant, trend towards a suppressive effect of L. casei on H. pylori in vivo may exist.


Subject(s)
Helicobacter Infections/prevention & control , Helicobacter pylori/growth & development , Lacticaseibacillus casei/physiology , Adult , Aged , Animals , Beverages , Dietary Supplements , Female , Helicobacter Infections/enzymology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Milk/microbiology , Urease/metabolism
3.
Clin Ther ; 20(4): 722-36, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9737832

ABSTRACT

The safety profile, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of four doses of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) were assessed in healthy volunteers in a double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Healthy subjects received subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 75 microg (n = 8), 150 microg (n = 4), 300 microg (n = 4), 600 microg (n = 8), or placebo (n = 6) daily for 10 consecutive days. Blood samples were drawn daily immediately before the injection and on days 1 and 10 serially throughout the day. Increased absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) were seen within 90 minutes of drug administration in subjects in all dose groups, peaking approximately 12 hours after administration. This increase was dose related in subjects in the three lower dose groups. The time to peak ANC on day 10 was approximately 9 hours, with a daily ANC profile in all four dose groups that was similar to the profile on day 1. In all dose groups, ANCs were near baseline within 48 hours of discontinuation of filgrastim. Mild, reversible thrombocytopenia was reported in 4 of 10 subjects in the highest dose group. Two subjects in the filgrastim 600-microg group were withdrawn for adverse events. Filgrastim had a good safety profile and caused dose-related increases in ANC when administered to healthy volunteers for up to 10 days.


Subject(s)
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/administration & dosage , Neutrophils/drug effects , Adult , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Filgrastim , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/blood , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Leukocyte Count/drug effects , Male , Neutrophils/cytology , Placebos , Recombinant Proteins
4.
Hum Reprod ; 11(1): 61-3, 1996 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8671157

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate bioequivalence between two follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-only gonadotrophin preparations (Follegon(R) and Metrodin(R)) after a single i.m. injection of IU FSH in-vivo bioactivity. A total of 16 healthy normally cycling females were treated for 7 weeks with a high-dose oral contraceptive containing 50 microg ethinyl oestradiol plus 2.5 mg lynestrenol (Lyndiol(R)) to suppress endogenous gonadotrophin production. After 3 and 5 weeks or oral contraceptive treatment, each subject received 300 IU Follegon or Metrodin in a random order. Frequent blood sampling was performed to measure immunoreactive FSH for pharmacokinetic analysis. After normalization for the immunodose administered, Follegon and Metrodin were bioequivalent with respect to the extent and the rate of absorption, the elimination half-life and plasma clearance per kg. The time taken to reach peak plasma FSH concentrations was shorter with Follegon than with Metrodin. Because bioequivalence was proved for the major pharmacokinetic variables, it can be assumed that Follegon and Metrodin are also equally effective inovulation induction, in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer programmes and the treatment of male infertility.


Subject(s)
Follicle Stimulating Hormone/pharmacokinetics , Therapeutic Equivalency , Adolescent , Adult , Contraceptives, Oral, Combined/administration & dosage , Drug Combinations , Female , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/administration & dosage , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood , Half-Life , Humans , Kinetics , Lynestrenol/administration & dosage , Mestranol/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...