Ambulatory electrical external cardioversion with propofol or etomidate.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare, in pairwise fashion, the effects of propofol and etomidate during ambulatory cardioversion and early recovery. DESIGN: Clinical, prospective, randomized, blinded, monocenter, pairwise, comparative study SETTING: OR and recovery area of the electrophysiological department, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium. PATIENTS: 34 patients with atrial arrhythmia who were scheduled for repetitive electrical cardioversion, of whom 25 patients completed the study. INTERVENTIONS: Nonpremedicated patients received during the first cardioversion either propofol (1 mg/kg) or etomidate (0.2 mg/kg) until loss of consciousness, followed by electrical external cardioversion. If after restoration of sinus rhythm for at least 1 day, atrial arrhythmia reoccurred, a second session was performed a week later, using the other induction drug. MEASUREMENTS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressure values taken before drug administration, at loss of consciousness, 60 seconds after cardioversion, and awake; the number of shocks, the total amount of energy, the number of patients in which we failed to restore sinus rhythm, the time before opening eyes, answering simple questions and be able to sit, were all noted. Aldrete scores and the Steward postanesthetic recovery scores were noted every minute until 10 minutes after the external cardioversion. Recovery tests were performed and evaluated 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after energy delivery. MAIN RESULTS: Number of shocks, amount of energy, and blood pressure values were comparable in both groups. Recovery times and Aldrete and Steward postanesthetic recovery scores showed a faster awakening in patients who were induced with propofol. Overall performance of the psychomotor test was better in the propofol group, and most pronounced at 10 and 15 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Etomidate and propofol are both useful during ambulatory external electrical cardioversion. The described doses maintain stable hemodynamic conditions in nonpremedicated patients. Recovery scores and psychomotor test indicate a faster recovery in the propofol group. However, no intergroup differences were noted at 20 minutes after the cardioversion. A safe discharge of all patients from the critical care unit or postanesthesia care unit to the ward can be considered after 30 minutes.

Dose requirements and recovery profile of an infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the dose requirements and recovery profile of an infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation. DESIGN: Open-label, descriptive study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: 6 ASA physical status III and IV patients with end-stage liver disease, undergoing liver transplantation. INTERVENTIONS: Neuromuscular transmission was monitored electromyographically. After recovery of T1/T0 to 10%, cisatracurium was infused at an initial rate of 1.5 microg/kg/min. The infusion rate was adjusted to maintain T1/T0 at 10%. At the end of surgery, spontaneous recovery from the neuromuscular block was awaited. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The infusion rate of cisatracurium was 1.6 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min. Before the anhepatic phase, this rate was 1.5 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min; during the anhepatic phase it was 1.7 +/- 0.5 microg/kg/min; and after reperfusion it was 1.9 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min. There was a significant difference between the cisatracurium infusion rates before and after the anhepatic phase (p < 0.05). Following termination of the infusion, the time to 25% recovery of T1/T0 was 19.2 +/- 6.1 minutes, the recovery index (25% to 75%) was 28.8 +/- 7.0 minutes, and the time for the train-of-four (TOF) ratio to reach 0.7 was 50.2 +/- 7.1 minutes. The time for the TOF ratio to reach 0.9 was 61.4 +/- 6.6 minutes. There was no difference in body temperature or pH during the consecutive stages of transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: The infusion dose requirement for cisatracurium during liver transplantation tended to be higher than previously reported in healthy patients; recovery appeared prolonged. In continuous infusion of cisatracurium during liver transplantation, the tendency toward higher dose requirements, the protracted duration of infusion, the non-Hofmann elimination and/or other pharmacokinetic changes during transplantation might influence recovery from the neuromuscular block. Potential temperature or pH change during surgery seemed irrelevant in explaining the delayed recovery.