Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 125(1): 1-10, 2020 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685213

ABSTRACT

The benefit-risk ratio of a pharmacoinvasive strategy (PI) in patients ≥70 years of age with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain resulting in its limited use in this population. This study compared efficacy and safety of PI with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Data from 2,841 patients (mean age: 78.1 ± 5.6 years, female: 36.1%) included in a prospective multicenter registry, and who underwent either PI (n = 269) or pPCI (n = 2,572), were analyzed. The primary end point was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, stroke, and definite stent thrombosis. Secondary end points included all-cause death, major bleeding, net adverse clinical events, and the development of in-hospital Killip class III or IV heart failure. Propensity-score matching and conditional logistic regression were used to adjust for confounders. Within the matched cohort, rates of MACE was not statistically different between the PI (n = 247) and pPCI (n = 958) groups, (11.3% vs 9.0%, respectively, odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 1.94; p = 0.31). Secondary end points were comparable between groups at the exception of a lower rate of development of Killip class III or IV heart failure after PI. The rate of intracranial hemorrhage was significantly higher in the PI group (2.3% vs 0.0%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the present study demonstrated no difference regarding in-hospital MACE following PI or pPCI in STEMI patients ≥70 years of age. An adequately-powered randomized trial is needed to precisely define the role of PI in this high-risk subgroup.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Registries , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cause of Death/trends , Female , Follow-Up Studies , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Survival Rate/trends , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Time-to-Treatment
2.
Eur Heart J ; 39(22): 2090-2102, 2018 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29554243

ABSTRACT

Aims: To derive and validate a readily useable risk score to identify patients at high-risk of in-hospital ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)-related cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods and results: In all, 6838 patients without CS on admission and treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI), included in the Observatoire Régional Breton sur l'Infarctus (ORBI), served as a derivation cohort, and 2208 patients included in the obseRvatoire des Infarctus de Côte-d'Or (RICO) constituted the external validation cohort. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression was used to build the score. Eleven variables were independently associated with the development of in-hospital CS: age >70 years, prior stroke/transient ischaemic attack, cardiac arrest upon admission, anterior STEMI, first medical contact-to-pPCI delay >90 min, Killip class, heart rate >90/min, a combination of systolic blood pressure <125 mmHg and pulse pressure <45 mmHg, glycaemia >10 mmol/L, culprit lesion of the left main coronary artery, and post-pPCI thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade <3. The score derived from these variables allowed the classification of patients into four risk categories: low (0-7), low-to-intermediate (8-10), intermediate-to-high (11-12), and high (≥13). Observed in-hospital CS rates were 1.3%, 6.6%, 11.7%, and 31.8%, across the four risk categories, respectively. Validation in the RICO cohort demonstrated in-hospital CS rates of 3.1% (score 0-7), 10.6% (score 8-10), 18.1% (score 11-12), and 34.1% (score ≥13). The score demonstrated high discrimination (c-statistic of 0.84 in the derivation cohort, 0.80 in the validation cohort) and adequate calibration in both cohorts. Conclusion: The ORBI risk score provides a readily useable and efficient tool to identify patients at high-risk of developing CS during hospitalization following STEMI, which may aid in further risk-stratification and thus potentially facilitate pre-emptive clinical decision making.


Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Shock, Cardiogenic/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , France/epidemiology , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Peripheral Arterial Disease/epidemiology , Prognosis , Registries , Risk Assessment , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Stroke/epidemiology
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 111(11): 656-665, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29229216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Recent studies demonstrated the superiority of complete revascularization (CR) in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). AIM: To evaluate whether immediate CR improves in-hospital outcomes in patients with STEMI with multivessel disease. METHODS: Data from a prospective multicentre registry including 9365 patients with STEMI were analysed. Patients with multivessel disease and treated with pPCI (n=3412) were included and separated into two groups according to whether immediate CR was performed during the index procedure. The primary endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke and definite stent thrombosis. Secondary endpoints were individual components of MACE and major bleeding. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity-score adjustment were performed to account for confounders. RESULTS: Immediate CR was performed in 98 patients (2.9%), whereas 3314 patients (97.1%) were incompletely revascularized. The prevalence of severe heart failure (Killip class III or IV) and significant lesions of the left main coronary artery were higher in the immediate CR group (21.6% vs. 13.5% and 24.5% vs. 6.7%, respectively; P<0.001 for both). After adjustment, immediate CR was not associated with reduced rates of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-1.35; P=0.24) or all-cause death (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.23-1.16; P=0.11), but with increased risks of definite stent thrombosis (HR: 3.93, 95% CI: 1.12-13.75; P=0.03) and major bleeding (HR: 17.46, 95% CI: 2.29-133.17; P=0.006). CONCLUSION: Immediate CR did not improve in-hospital outcomes of patients with STEMI with multivessel disease in this analysis. Randomized studies are warranted to elucidate the optimal timing of CR in patients with STEMI.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Artery Disease/mortality , Coronary Thrombosis/etiology , Female , France , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/mortality , Recurrence , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Stroke/etiology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Int J Cardiol ; 221: 433-42, 2016 Oct 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27409570

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Acute heart failure (AHF) complicating ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is recognized as an ominous complication. Previous studies mostly reported outcomes of heterogeneous, non-contemporary population. Moreover, few studies assessed the prognosis of AHF according to its timing. This study evaluated incidence, predictors and impact of AHF according to its timing in a homogeneous STEMI patients population treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS: Data from 6282 patients included in a prospective multicenter registry were analyzed. Patients with AHF (Killip class>I) were compared to patients without AHF and patients with admission AHF were compared to patients who developed in-hospital AHF. In-hospital mortality was the primary endpoint of the study. Propensity-score matching and multivariable regression were used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1328 patients (21.1%) presented AHF: 739 on admission and 589 during hospitalization. AHF was associated with a markedly increased in-hospital mortality rate (19.9% vs. 0.8%, p<0.001). There was a gradual excess risk with each Killip class and admission AHF patients displayed the highest crude mortality rate (24.1%). By multivariable analysis, AHF was the strongest independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (HR=3.852 (2.303-6.442), p<0.001) without evidence of any difference according to its timing (HR=0.947 (0.638-1.372), p=0.767). These results were consistent after extensive adjustment on baseline characteristics in the matched cohorts. Among other predictors, pPCI beyond guidelines-recommended delays and stent thrombosis were independently associated with AHF. CONCLUSION: AHF regardless of its timing remains a common and dreadful complication of STEMI in the contemporary era.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/therapy , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Acute Disease , Aged , Female , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/trends , Predictive Value of Tests , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...