ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the effect of atelectasis during mechanical ventilation on the periatelectatic and normal lung regions in a model of atelectasis in rats with acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide. Methods: Twenty-four rats were randomized into the following four groups, each with 6 animals: the Saline-Control Group, Lipopolysaccharide Control Group, Saline-Atelectasis Group, and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group. Acute lung injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. After 24 hours, atelectasis was induced by bronchial blocking. The animals underwent mechanical ventilation for two hours with protective parameters, and respiratory mechanics were monitored during this period. Thereafter, histologic analyses of two regions of interest, periatelectatic areas and the normally-aerated lung contralateral to the atelectatic areas, were performed. Results: The lung injury score was significantly higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Control Group (0.41 ± 0.13) than in the Saline Control Group (0.15 ± 0.51), p < 0.05. Periatelectatic regions showed higher lung injury scores than normally-aerated regions in both the Saline-Atelectasis (0.44 ± 0.06 x 0.27 ± 0.74 p < 0.05) and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis (0.56 ± 0.09 x 0.35 ± 0.04 p < 0.05) Groups. The lung injury score in the periatelectatic regions was higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group (0.56 ± 0.09) than in the periatelectatic region of the Saline-Atelectasis Group (0.44 ± 0.06), p < 0.05. Conclusion: Atelectasis may cause injury to the surrounding tissue after a period of mechanical ventilation with protective parameters. Its effect was more significant in previously injured lungs.
RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar o efeito da atelectasia durante a ventilação mecânica nas regiões periatelectáticas e pulmonares normais em um modelo de atelectasia em ratos com lesão pulmonar aguda induzida por lipopolissacarídeo. Métodos: Foram distribuídos aleatoriamente 24 ratos em quatro grupos, cada um com 6 animais: Grupo Salina-Controle, Grupo Lipopolissacarídeo-Controle, Grupo Salina-Atelectasia e Grupo Lipopolissacarídeo-Atelectasia. A lesão pulmonar aguda foi induzida por injeção intraperitoneal de lipopolissacarídeo. Após 24 horas, a atelectasia foi induzida por bloqueio brônquico. Os animais foram submetidos à ventilação mecânica por 2 horas com parâmetros ventilatórios protetores, e a mecânica respiratória foi monitorada durante esse período. Em seguida, foram realizadas análises histológicas de duas regiões de interesse: as áreas periatelectásicas e o pulmão normalmente aerado contralateral às áreas atelectásicas. Resultados: O escore de lesão pulmonar foi significativamente maior no Grupo Controle-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,41 ± 0,13) do que no Grupo Controle-Solução Salina (0,15 ± 0,51), com p < 0,05. As regiões periatelectásicas apresentaram escores maiores de lesão pulmonar do que as regiões normalmente aeradas nos Grupos Atelectasia-Solução Salina (0,44 ± 0,06 versus 0,27 ± 0,74, p < 0,05) e Atelectasia-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,56 ± 0,09 versus 0,35 ± 0,04, p < 0,05). O escore de lesão pulmonar nas regiões periatelectásicas foi maior no Grupo Atelectasia-Lipopolissacarídeo (0,56 ± 0,09) do que na região periatelectásica do Grupo Atelectasia-Solução Salina (0,44 ± 0,06), p < 0,05. Conclusão: A atelectasia pode causar lesão no tecido circundante após um período de ventilação mecânica com parâmetros ventilatórios protetores. Seu efeito foi mais significativo em pulmões previamente lesionados.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of atelectasis during mechanical ventilation on the periatelectatic and normal lung regions in a model of atelectasis in rats with acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide. METHODS: Twenty-four rats were randomized into the following four groups, each with 6 animals: the Saline-Control Group, Lipopolysaccharide Control Group, Saline-Atelectasis Group, and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group. Acute lung injury was induced by intraperitoneal injection of lipopolysaccharide. After 24 hours, atelectasis was induced by bronchial blocking. The animals underwent mechanical ventilation for two hours with protective parameters, and respiratory mechanics were monitored during this period. Thereafter, histologic analyses of two regions of interest, periatelectatic areas and the normally-aerated lung contralateral to the atelectatic areas, were performed. RESULTS: The lung injury score was significantly higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Control Group (0.41 ± 0.13) than in the Saline Control Group (0.15 ± 0.51), p < 0.05. Periatelectatic regions showed higher lung injury scores than normally-aerated regions in both the Saline-Atelectasis (0.44 ± 0.06 x 0.27 ± 0.74 p < 0.05) and Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis (0.56 ± 0.09 x 0.35 ± 0.04 p < 0.05) Groups. The lung injury score in the periatelectatic regions was higher in the Lipopolysaccharide Atelectasis Group (0.56 ± 0.09) than in the periatelectatic region of the Saline-Atelectasis Group (0.44 ± 0.06), p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Atelectasis may cause injury to the surrounding tissue after a period of mechanical ventilation with protective parameters. Its effect was more significant in previously injured lungs.
Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury , Pulmonary Atelectasis , Animals , Rats , Lipopolysaccharides , Respiration, Artificial , Saline Solution , Lung , Models, TheoreticalABSTRACT
The effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on an experimental model of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) was evaluated in this study. 24 adult Wistar rats were randomized into four groups: protective mechanical ventilation (PMV), PMV + laser, VILI and VILI + laser. The animals of the PMV and VILI groups were ventilated with tidal volumes of 6 and 35 ml kg-1, respectively, for 90 minutes. After the first 60 minutes of ventilation, the animals in the laser groups were irradiated (808 nm, 100 mW power density, 20 J cm-2 energy density, continuous emission mode, and exposure time of 5 s) and after 30 minutes of irradiation, the animals were euthanized. Lung samples were removed for morphological analysis, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and real time quantitative polynucleotide chain reaction (RT-qPCR). The VILI group showed a greater acute lung injury (ALI) score with an increase in neutrophil infiltration, higher neutrophil count in the BAL fluid and greater cytokine mRNA expression compared to the PMV groups (p < 0.05). The VILI + laser group when compared to the VILI group showed a lower ALI score (0.35 ± 0.08 vs. 0.54 ± 0.13, p < 0.05), alveolar neutrophil infiltration (7.00 ± 5.73 vs. 21.50 ± 9.52, p < 0.05), total cell count (1.90 ± 0.71 vs. 4.09 ± 0.96 × 105, p < 0.05) and neutrophil count in the BAL fluid (0.60 ± 0.37 vs. 2.28 ± 0.48 × 105, p < 0.05). Moreover, LLLT induced a decrease in pro-inflammatory and an increase of anti-inflammatory mRNA levels compared to the VILI group (p < 0.05). In conclusion, LLLT was found to reduce the inflammatory response in an experimental model of VILI.
Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Inflammation/therapy , Low-Level Light Therapy , Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury/therapy , Animals , Male , Rats , Rats, WistarABSTRACT
Introdução: A ventilação mecânica pode ser uma estratégia salvadora de vidas em pacientes com insuficiência respiratória. Porém, ela é potencialmente perigosa e pode causar a chamada lesão pulmonar induzida pela ventilação mecânica (VILI). Esta revisão objetivou analisar os resultados de ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECR) que avaliaram o impacto de ajustes ventilatórios sobre a mortalidade. Material e Métodos: Nós Buscou-se, na base PubMed ECR, artigos publicados entre 1980 e 2019, usando os seguintes termos MeSH: "respiratory distress syndrome, adult" and "respiration, artificial". Selecionou-se os ECR que compararam diferentes parâmetros ventilatórios e que tiveram a mortalidade como desfecho. Resultados: Em pacientes com síndrome do desconforto respiratório agudo (SDRA), demonstrou-se que a limitações do volume corrente, da pressão de platô e da pressão de distensão reduzem a mortalidade. Na SDRA grave, o uso de pressão expiratória final positiva (PEEP) mais alta e a posição prona também reduzem a mortalidade. Entre pacientes sem SDRA, ainda é incerto se alguma dessas estratégias associa-se a melhor sobrevida. Conclusão: Em pacientes com SDRA, deve-se estar atento para o ajuste da ventilação mecânica, pois parâmetros protetores podem aumentar a sobrevida.
Introduction: Mechanical ventilation can be a life-saving strategy in patients with respiratory failure. However, it is potentially dangerous and can induce a so-called ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). This revision aimed to analyze the results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated the impact of ventilatory settings on mortality. Material and Methods: We search in PubMed for RCT, published from 1980 to 2019, using the following MeSH terms: "respiratory distress syndrome, adult" and "respiration, artificial". We selected the RCT that compared different ventilatory settings and had mortality as an outcome. Results: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), it has been demonstrated that limiting tidal volume, plateau pressure, and driving pressure reduced mortality. In severe ARDS, the use of higher PEEP and prone position also reduced mortality. Among non-ARDS patients, it is still uncertain if any strategy is associated with better survival rates. Conclusion: In ARDS patients, one has to be aware of setting the ventilatory parameters because protective settings can improve survival.
