"I wasn't sure it would work. I was just trying": an ethnographic study on the choice of abortion methods among young women in Kilifi County, Kenya, and Atlantique Department, Benin.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased availability of safe abortion methods in sub-Saharan Africa, women and girls continue to use unsafe abortion methods and procedures to terminate their unwanted pregnancies, resulting in severe complications, lifelong disabilities, and death. Barriers to safe abortion methods include restrictive laws, low awareness of safe abortion methods, poverty, and sociocultural and health system barriers. Nonetheless, there is a paucity of data on the decision-making around and use of abortion methods. This paper aims to provide answers to the following questions: Which abortion methods do women and girls use and why? Who and what influences their decisions? What can we learn from their decision-making process to enhance the uptake of safe abortion methods? We focus our in-depth analysis on the rationale behind the choice of abortion methods used by women and girls in Kilifi County in Kenya and Atlantique Department in Benin. METHODS: We draw on data collected as part of an ethnographic study conducted between January and August 2021 on lived experiences, social determinants, and pathways to abortion. Data were collected using repeated in-depth interviews with 95 girls and women who had a recent abortion experience. Data from the interviews were supplemented using information from key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. Data analysis was conducted through an inductive process. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that women and girls use various methods to procure abortions, including herbs, high doses of pharmaceutical drugs, homemade concoctions, medical abortion drugs, and surgical abortion methods. Procedures may involve singular or multiple attempts, and sometimes, mixing several methods to achieve the goal of pregnancy termination. The use of various abortion methods is mainly driven by the pursuit of social safety (preservation of secrecy and social relationships, avoidance of shame and stigmatization) instead of medical safety (which implies technical safety and quality). CONCLUSION: Our findings reaffirm the need for comprehensive access to, and availability of, abortion-related information and services, especially safe abortion and post-abortion care services that emphasize both medical and social safety.

Despite the availability of safe abortion methods in sub-Saharan Africa, women and girls in the region continue to resort to unsafe methods, leading to severe complications, disabilities, and maternal death. This can be attributed to restrictive abortion laws, lack of awareness on safe abortion methods, poverty, and sociocultural and health system barriers. This paper uses data from a larger ethnographic study in Kilifi County, Kenya, and Atlantique Department, Benin, to understand which methods women and girls use, and why, to help improve the use of safe abortion methods.Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 95 girls and women who had recently undergone an abortion, as well as key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and participant observation. The findings reveal that women and girls use various methods to terminate their pregnancies, including herbs, high doses of pharmaceutical drugs, homemade concoctions, medical abortion drugs, and surgical methods. They often use these methods once, multiple times, or in combination to achieve their goal. The main reason for their choice of methods is not medical safety but social safety, including preserving social relationships and avoiding shame and stigma.We conclude that there is a pressing need for greater access to accurate, well-framed information about safe abortion methods. Abortion services should consider not only medical safety but also discretion to mitigate the social implications of having an abortion in a medical facility. By addressing these factors, it is possible to enhance the use of safe abortion methods and reduce the reliance on unsafe practices.

Why do most young women not take up contraceptives after post-abortion care? An ethnographic study on the effectiveness and quality of contraceptive counselling after PAC in Kilifi County, Kenya.

Post-abortion care (PAC) counselling and the provision of contraceptive methods are core components of PAC services. Nevertheless, this service is not uniformly provided to PAC patients. This paper explores the factors contributing to young women leaving health facilities without counselling and contraceptive methods. The paper draws from an ethnographic study conducted in Kilifi County, Kenya, in 2021. We conducted participant observation in health facilities and neighbouring communities, and held in-depth interviews with 21 young women aged 15-24 who received PAC. In addition, we interviewed 11 healthcare providers recruited from the public and private health facilities observed. Findings revealed that post-abortion contraceptive counselling and methods were not always offered to patients as part of PAC as prescribed in the PAC guidelines. When PAC contraceptive counselling was offered, certain barriers affected uptake of the methods, including inadequate information, coercion by providers and partners, and fears of side effects. Together, these factors contributed to repeat unintended pregnancies and repeat abortions. The absence of quality contraceptive counselling therefore infringes on the right to health of girls and young women. Findings underscore the need to strengthen the capacities of health providers on PAC contraceptive counselling and address their attitudes towards young female PAC patients.

"I will never wish this pain to even my worst enemy": Lived experiences of pain associated with manual vacuum aspiration during post-abortion care in Kenya.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Kenya, where abortion is legally restricted, most abortions are induced using unsafe procedures, and lead to complications treated in public health facilities. The introduction of Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) to treat incomplete abortion has improved the management of abortion complications. However, this technology comes with pain whose management has been a challenge. This paper explores the lived experiences of pain (management) during MVA to document the contributing factors. METHODS: We used an ethnographic approach to explore girls and healthcare providers' experiences in offering and accessing post-abortion care in Kilifi County, Kenya. The data collection approach included participant observation and informal conversations in public health facilities and neighboring communities, as well as in-depth interviews with 21 girls and young women treated for abortion complication and 12 healthcare providers. RESULTS: Our findings show that almost all patients described the MVA as the most painful procedure they have ever experienced. The unbearable pain was explained by various factors, including the lack of preparedness of health facilities to offer PAC services (i.e. lack of pain medicine, lack of training, inadequate knowledge and grasp of pain medication guidelines, and malfunctioning MVA kits). Moreover, the attitudes of healthcare providers and facilities management toward the MVA device limited the supply and replacement of MVA kits. Moreover, the scarcity of pain medicines also gave some providers the opportunity to abuse patients guided by their values, whereby they would deny patients pain medication as a form of "punishment" if they were suspected of inducing their abortion, especially adolescent girls. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest the need for clearer guidelines on pain medication, value clarification and attitude transformation training for providers, systematizing the use of medical uterine evacuation using medical abortion drug and strengthening the supply chain of pain medication and MVA kits to reduce the pain and improve the quality of post-abortion care.

« Éloigne cette honte de moi! ¼: une étude qualitative des normes sociales entourant les expériences d'avortement chez les adolescentes et jeunes femmes au Bénin.

In Africa, the rights of adolescent girls and young women in terms of sexual and reproductive health are strongly influenced by social norms. This article delves into the pivotal role these norms play in the abortion decisions and experiences of young women aged 15-24 in Benin. An ethnographic approach was adopted for data collection among young women who have undergone abortion, their confidants, and other community members. The findings reveal that these young women face a threefold normative burden in their social environment. They juggle contradictory norms that simultaneously stigmatise early pregnancies, hinder proper sexual education, and strongly condemn abortion. These normative pressures often drive their resort to abortions, typically carried out under unsafe conditions. The study also highlights the significant role parents play in the abortion decisions and processes of teenagers under 20. When men are involved in seeking care for abortion, adolescents and young women usually access safer procedures. However, their access to aftercare and contraception following an abortion is hindered by the social norms of healthcare professionals. In addition to broadening the conditions of access to abortion in Benin in October 2021, it is imperative to implement interventions centred on value clarification, raising awareness of adolescents' rights, combating obstetric violence, and social stigmatisation. These measures are crucial to alleviate the weight of social norms bearing down on these young women. DOI: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2294793.

RésuméEn Afrique, les droits des adolescentes et des jeunes femmes en matière de santé sexuelle et reproductive sont fortement influencés par les normes sociales. Cet article se penche sur le rôle crucial que jouent ces normes dans les décisions et les parcours d'avortement des jeunes femmes âgées de 15 à 24 ans au Bénin. Une approche ethnographique a été adoptée pour la collecte des données auprès des jeunes femmes ayant eu recours à l'avortement, de leurs proches, ainsi que d'autres membres de la communauté.Les résultats révèlent que ces jeunes femmes se retrouvent confrontées à une triple charge normative dans leur environnement social. Elles doivent jongler avec des normes contradictoires qui stigmatisent à la fois les grossesses précoces, entravent une éducation sexuelle adéquate, et condamnent fermement l'avortement. Ces pressions normatives sont souvent le moteur de leur recours à des avortements, généralement effectués dans des conditions précaires. L'étude met également en évidence le rôle majeur des parents dans les décisions et les démarches d'avortement des adolescentes de moins de 20 ans. Lorsque les hommes sont impliqués dans la recherche de soins pour l'avortement, les adolescentes et les jeunes femmes ont généralement accès à des procédures sécurisées. Cependant, leur accès aux soins de suivi et à la contraception après un avortement est entravé par les normes sociales des professionnels de la santé.En plus de l'élargissement des conditions d'accès à l'avortement au Bénin en octobre 2021, il est impératif de mettre en œuvre des interventions axées sur la clarification des valeurs, la sensibilisation aux droits des adolescentes, la lutte contre les violences obstétricales et la stigmatisation sociale. Ces mesures sont essentielles pour alléger le poids des normes sociales qui pèsent sur ces jeunes femmes.