ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is an anatomo-clinical evaluation of the primary cystic mesenterico-epiploic tumors,based on a single-center's 15 year experience. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We performed a retrospective study of a series of 14 primary cystic mesenterico-epiploic tumors that were operated in the Surgical Department 4 UMPh Targu-Mures, Romania, between 01.01.1997 and 01.01.2012. Data about the clinical complaints, imagistic aspects, associated lesions, surgical approach, hospitalization, pathology, and immediate and late postoperative course were recorded and analysed using the Microsoft Excel software. RESULTS: In all cases we performed a complete and intact surgical excision, using an open approach in 13 cases and laparoscopy in 1 case, with no mortality and no significant surgical-related morbidity; we have encountered a single recurrence at 1.5 years after surgery. We had no preoperative pathological diagnosis; the exact preoperative anatomic location of the tumor was possible only in one case. Pathologic examination showed the following types: inclusion cysts - 4 cases, enteral duplication cysts - 2 cases, simple mesothelialcysts - 6 cases, cystic lymphangioma - 1 case and simple lymphatic cyst - 1 case. We have systematized 3 clinicoimagistic patterns according to the dimension of the tumor,with no relationship to the histologic origin of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Primary cystic mesenterico-epiploic tumors aredifficult to diagnose preoperatively. Complete excision is usually possible, even for large tumors. These relatively rare tumors must be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic abdominal masses.
Subject(s)
Lymphangioma, Cystic/diagnosis , Mesenteric Cyst/diagnosis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Peritoneal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Length of Stay , Lymphangioma, Cystic/surgery , Male , Mesenteric Cyst/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the paper is to evaluate the results achieved after mobilization of the omentum outside the peritoneal cavity. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between 01.01.2006-01.01.2012, the main author has performed an extraperitoneal mobilization of the omentum in 12 patients. The indications for the use of this flap were: prophylactic filling of the remnant space after the Miles procedure - 4 cases, solving of some pelvisubperitoneal and perineal complications after rectal surgery - 3 cases, covering of vascular prosthesis - 3 cases (2 of them with active infection) and closure of a post-pneumonectomy bronchial fistula - 1 case. The mobilization of the flap was performed by laparotomy - 10 cases, by laparoscopy - 1 case and transdiaphragmatic (thoracotomy) - 1 case; all the procedures were performed by the same team, with no assistance on behalf of a plastic surgeon. RESULTS: We have encountered one immediate postoperative death through myocardial infarction on postoperative day 12 (vascular prosthesis infection in a 75 years old patient). Based on the clinical and imagistic evaluation, we have encountered no necrosis of the omental flap. At late follow-up (1-5 years) we have encountered no significant complications related to the use of this flap. CONCLUSIONS: The omentum is a solution for a great variety of defects located outside the peritoneal cavity; it's mobilization is relatively simple and does not involve a major morbidity. Knowledge of the omentum's anatomy and techniques of mobilization are mandatory in digestive, thoracic and vascular surgery.
