Therapeutic inertia in rhythm control strategies in hospitalized patients with fibrillation: Insights from Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot (HECMOS) study.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend a rhythm control strategy in patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) while catheter ablation has been shown to be a safer and more efficacious approach than antiarrhythmic medications. METHODS: HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. In this sub-study, we included 276 cases who had a history of AF, particularly on the rhythm strategy, and catheter ablation procedures had been performed before the index admission. RESULTS: Among 276 AF patients (mean age: 76.4 ±â€¯11.5 years, 58 % male), 60.9 % (N = 168) had persistent AF and 39.1 % (N = 108) had paroxysmal AF. Heart failure was the main cause of admission in 54.3 % (N = 145) of the patients, while 14.1 % (N = 39) were admitted due to paroxysmal AF, 7.3 % (N = 20) due to bradyarrhythmic reasons, and 6.5 % (N = 18) suffered from acute coronary syndrome. Most importantly, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction was present in 76 (27 %) patients. Only 10 patients out of the total (3 %, mean age 59.7 years) had undergone AF ablation while electrical cardioversion had been attempted in 37 (13.4 %) patients. Interestingly, in this AF population with heart failure, 3.6 % (N = 10) had a defibrillator implanted (4 single-chamber), and only 1.5 % (N = 4) had a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D). CONCLUSION: High prevalence of persistent AF was detected in hospitalized patients, with heart failure being the leading cause of admission and main co-morbidity. Rhythm control strategies are notably underused, along with CRT-D implantation in patients with AF and heart failure.

Electrocardiographic Characteristics, Identification, and Management of Frequent Premature Ventricular Contractions.

Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are frequently encountered in clinical practice. The association of PVCs with adverse cardiovascular outcomes is well established in the context of structural heart disease, yet not so much in the absence of structural heart disease. However, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) seems to contribute prognostically in the latter subgroup. PVC-induced myocardial dysfunction refers to the impairment of ventricular function due to PVCs and is mostly associated with a PVC burden > 10%. Surface 12-lead ECG has long been used to localize the anatomic site of origin and multiple algorithms have been developed to differentiate between right ventricular and left ventricular outflow tract (RVOT and LVOT, respectively) origin. Novel algorithms include alternative ECG lead configurations and, lately, sophisticated artificial intelligence methods have been utilized to determine the origins of outflow tract arrhythmias. The decision to therapeutically address PVCs should be made upon the presence of symptoms or the development of PVC-induced myocardial dysfunction. Therapeutic modalities include pharmacological therapy (I-C antiarrhythmic drugs and beta blockers), as well as catheter ablation, which has demonstrated superior efficacy and safety.

Anticoagulation Status and Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Indications in Hospitalized Cardiology Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot (HECMOS) Sub-Study.

Background and Objectives: The proper use of oral anticoagulants is crucial in the management of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may be considered for stroke prevention in patients with AF and contraindications for long-term anticoagulant treatment. We aimed to assess anticoagulation status and LAAC indications in patients with AF from the HECMOS (Hellenic Cardiorenal Morbidity Snapshot) survey. Materials and Methods: The HECMOS was a nationwide snapshot survey of cardiorenal morbidity in hospitalized cardiology patients. HECMOS used an electronic platform to collect demographic and clinically relevant information from all patients hospitalized on 3 March 2022 in 55 different cardiology departments. In this substudy, we included patients with known AF without mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate-to-severe mitral valve stenosis. Patients with prior stroke, previous major bleeding, poor adherence to anticoagulants, and end-stage renal disease were considered candidates for LAAC. Results: Two hundred fifty-six patients (mean age 76.6 ± 11.7, 148 males) were included in our analysis. Most of them (n = 159; 62%) suffered from persistent AF. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.28 ± 1.7, while the mean HAS-BLED score was 1.47 ± 0.9. Three out of three patients with a a CHA2DS2-VASc score of 0 or 1 (female) were inappropriately anticoagulated. Sixteen out of eighteen patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score 1 or 2 (if female) received anticoagulants. Thirty-one out of two hundred thirty-five patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score > 1 or 2 (if female) were inappropriately not anticoagulated. Relative indications for LAAC were present in 68 patients with NVAF (63 had only one risk factor and 5 had two concurrent risk factors). In detail, 36 had a prior stroke, 17 patients had a history of major bleeding, 15 patients reported poor or no adherence to the anticoagulant therapy and 5 had an eGFR value < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2 for a total of 73 risk factors. Moreover, 33 had a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3. No LAAC treatment was recorded. Conclusions: Anticoagulation status was nearly optimal in a high-thromboembolic-risk population of cardiology patients who were mainly treated using NOACs. One out of four AF patients should be screened for LAAC.

Total Atrial Conduction Time as a Predictor of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the predictive value of total atrial conduction time (TACT) assessed by tissue Doppler echocardiography (PA-TDI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients following a rhythm-control strategy. A systematic approach following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guidelines was applied in electronic databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science), supplemented by scanning through studies' references. TACT was compared using a random-effects model and presented as a difference in means (MD). The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Seven publications were included in this systematic review. The mean age of the patients ranged from 55 years to 72 years. Prolonged TACT was associated with AF recurrence [MD, 23.12 msec; 95% confidence interval (CI), 11.54-34.71; I2 = 95%]. Subgroup analysis showed that prolonged TACT was strongly associated with AF recurrence in persistent AF cohorts undergoing electrical cardioversion (MD, 26.56; 95% CI, 15.51-37.6; I2 = 86%), while in patients with paroxysmal AF (PAF) undergoing catheter ablation, the results were not statistically significant (MD, 11.48; 95% CI, -1.19 to 24.14; I2 = 90%). The summary area under the curve (sAUC) using a random-effects model was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.99). TACT is a valuable echocardiographic parameter that can predict AF recurrence in patients following a rhythm-control strategy. Protocol registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022353018.

Clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with digoxin, according to the presence of heart failure: Insights from the MISOAC-AF trial.

BACKGROUND: Digoxin is widely used in atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF). However, current evidence regarding its association with clinical outcomes is conflicting. AIM: To investigate the relationship between digoxin therapy and adverse outcomes in patients with AF, with or without HF, in a contemporary AF cohort. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 698 patients, who were followed over a median of 2.5 years. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was all-cause hospitalization, in a time-to-event analysis. Propensity scores were used to derive matched populations, balanced on key baseline covariates. To limit potential confounding, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among patients with HF, 39 (10.5%) were administered digoxin at baseline, whereas 331 (89.5%) were not. Digoxin administration was not associated with an increased risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) in the digoxin group, 1.21; 95% Confidence Interval (CI), 0.69 to 2.13, p = 0.50) or hospitalization of any cause (HR 1.15; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.96; p = 0.60). Among patients without HF, 11 (3.5%) were administered digoxin, with neutral effects on all-cause mortality (HR: 3.25; 95% CI, 0.98 to 10.70), p = 0.06) and all-cause hospitalization (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.96, p = 0.60). Qualitatively, consistent results were observed using IPTW. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with AF, digoxin administration was not associated with an increased risk of death and hospitalization for any cause, irrespective of HF status.

Renal function and mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIM: The aim of this study is to examine the association of the presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values with mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This posthoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial consisted of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation who were followed up for a median of 2.7 years after discharge. Kaplan-Meier curves, multivariate Cox-regression and spline curves were utilized to assess the association of CKD, CKD stages 2-5 according to the KDOQI guidelines, and the continuum of eGFR values with the primary outcome of all-cause death, and the secondary outcome of cardiovascular mortality. RESULTS: Out of 1064 hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation, 465 (43.7%) had comorbid CKD. The presence of CKD was associated with an increased risk for both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality following hospitalization [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.60; 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs): 1.25-2.05 and aHR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.30-2.33, respectively]. The aHRs for all-cause mortality in CKD stages 2-5, as compared with CKD stage 1 were 2.18, 2.62, 4.20 and 3.38, respectively (all P < 0.05). In spline curve analyses, eGFR values lower than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were independent predictors of higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. CONCLUSION: In recently hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation, the presence of CKD was independently associated with decreased survival, which was significant across CKD stages 2-5, as compared with CKD stage 1. Values of eGFR lower than 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were incrementally associated with worse prognosis.

Education level predicts mortality and morbidity in hospitalised patients with atrial fibrillation.

AIM: Education level has been long considered a life-quality modifier, but little is known about its relation to life expectancy in patients with cardiovascular disease. This study aims to assess possible correlations between education level and survival in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from a randomised trial of 1082 hospitalised patients with AF (mean age of 75 ± 11 years) who were followed up after discharge. Patients were divided into three groups based on their education level: i) none or primary (NPEL), ii) secondary (SEL), and iii) tertiary education level (TEL). Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were used to compare survival rates between groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The composite secondary outcome was cardiovascular mortality or any hospitalisation. RESULTS: After a median 31-month follow-up period, 289 (41.9%) patients died in the NPEL group, 75 (31.1%) in the SEL group, and 29 (19.1%) in the TEL group. The aHRs for all-cause mortality were 0.42 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.66; p < 0.001) for the TEL group compared with the NPEL group, 0.55 (95% CI, 0.33 to 0.93; p = 0.02) for the TEL group compared with the SEL group, and 0.68 (95% CI, 0.50 to 0.93; p = 0.01) for the SEL group compared with the NPEL group. The corresponding aHRs for the composite secondary outcome were 0.36 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.52; p < 0.001), 0.49 (95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80; p < 0.001), and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.50 to 9.91; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Higher education levels were independently associated with fewer fatal and non-fatal outcomes in recently hospitalised patients with AF.

Rhythm control versus rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure across the left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum.

BACKGROUND: Rhythm control and rate control are both employed commonly in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), but limited real-world data exist on them. We aimed to compare outcomes between these two strategies across the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) spectrum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the randomized MISOAC-AF trial, including from patients with AF and coexistent HF who were hospitalized and followed up after discharge. At baseline, the patients were classified into pharmaceutical (or electrical cardioversion) rhythm control strategy or rate control treatment (b-blocker, digoxin, calcium channel blockers) groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression were utilized to compare the two strategies. Spline curve models were used to demonstrate the results across the LVEF stratified spectrum. RESULTS: In total, 199 AF patients with HF were studied (mean age, 77 years). At discharge, 73 (36.7%) patients received rhythm control and 126 (63.3%) rate control treatment. After a median follow-up period of 31 months, 26 (35.6%) patients in the rhythm-control group died, as compared to 43 (33.3%) in the rate-control group (aHR: 1.29; 95% CI: 0.78-2.14; p = 0.31). The spline curves also revealed no difference in all-cause mortality favoring either strategy in any HF subtype across the nominally classified LVEF. CONCLUSION: The use of a pharmacological rhythm-control strategy was not associated with a survival advantage compared to the rate control strategy in recently hospitalized patients with AF and comorbid HF. More randomized trials and large studies are needed in the future to explore these results in each subgroup of HF patients.

Associations of Atrial Fibrillation Patterns With Mortality and Cardiovascular Events: Implications of the MISOAC-AF Trial.

AIM: This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the prognostic implications of the distinct atrial fibrillation (AF) temporal patterns: first diagnosed, paroxysmal, and persistent or permanent AF. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the MISOAC-AF trial (NCT02941978), a total of 1052 patients with AF (median age 76 years), discharged from the cardiology ward between 2015 and 2018, were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and Cox-regression analyses were performed to compare the primary outcome of all-cause mortality, the secondary outcomes of stroke, major bleeding and the composite outcome of cardiovascular (CV) mortality or hospitalization among AF patterns. RESULTS: Of patients, 121 (11.2%) had first diagnosed, 356 (33%) paroxysmal, and 575 (53.2%) persistent or permanent AF. During a median follow-up of 31 months (interquartile range 10 to 52 months), 37.3% of patients died. Compared with paroxysmal AF, patients with persistent or permanent AF had higher mortality rates (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.74, P = .009), but similar CV mortality or hospitalization rates (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.31, P = .35). Compared with first diagnosed AF, patients with persistent or permanent AF had similar mortality (aHR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.87-1.82, P = .24), but higher CV mortality or hospitalization rates (aHR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.01-1.8, P = .04). Stroke and major bleeding events did not differ across AF patterns (all P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, in recently hospitalized patients with comorbid AF, the presence of persistent or permanent AF was associated with a higher incidence of mortality and morbidity compared with paroxysmal and first diagnosed AF.

Oral anticoagulation patterns and prognosis in octogenarian patients with atrial fibrillation.

The relationship between oral anticoagulants (OACs) and prognosis in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been adequately explored. In this retrospective cohort study, we identified subjects aged over 80 from a database of 1140 AF patients discharged from the cardiology ward of a single tertiary center between 2015 and 2018. We examined the OAC treatment of octogenarian patients at discharge [VKA (vitamin K antagonist), NOAC (non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant), no OAC treatment]. We analyzed follow-up data of patients on OAC at discharge. The primary endpoint was all-cause death. The secondary endpoint was the incidence of stroke and major bleeding. The association of NOAC versus VKA treatment with these endpoints was assessed with multivariable Cox regression, using the VKA group as reference. A total of 330 octogenarian patients with AF were included with a mean (± SD) age of 83.9 ± 3.5 years. At discharge, 53.3% received a NOAC, 30% a VKA, and 16.7% no OAC. Patients on OAC were followed-up over a median of 2.6-years . The adjusted risk of all-cause death was not different in the NOAC group, compared with the VKA group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.50-1.03; P = 0.07). The risk of stroke or major bleeding was not different either (all P > 0.05). In conclusion, in this cohort of post-discharge octogenarian patients with AF, the risk for all-cause death was similar in NOAC versus VKA users, after adjustment for baseline covariates. No differences in stroke and major bleeding events among these treatment groups were revealed.

Τhe association of heart failure across left ventricular ejection fraction with mortality in atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic implications of the presence of heart failure (HF) across the range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with comorbid atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1063 patients (median age 76 years), discharged from the cardiology ward with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF between 2015 and 2018. We used Cox proportional-hazards and spline models to examine the association of the presence of HF, across the range of LVEF, with the primary outcome of all-cause mortality. HF was documented in 52.9% of patients at baseline. During a median follow-up of 31 months (interquartile range 10 to 52 months), 37.3% of patients died. The presence of HF was associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.70 to 2.77; P < 0.001], which was evident across HF with reduced (aHR 3.03; 95% CI 2.41 to 4.52), mid-range (aHR 2.08; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.94), and preserved LVEF (aHR 1.94; 95% CI 1.47 to 2.55). Among patients with HF, the spline curve depicted a non-linear association between LVEF and the risk of death, in which there was a steep and progressive increase in mortality for every 5% reduction in LVEF below 25% (aHR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.73, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF who were discharged from the hospital, the presence of HF at baseline was independently associated with a twofold risk of death, which was significant across LVEF-classified HF subtypes. Among patients with AF and HF, the risk of death rose significantly as LVEF was reduced below 25%.

Prognostic significance of diabetes mellitus in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the association of diabetes mellitus (DM) and levels of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) with outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who were recently hospitalized with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF from December 2015 through June 2018. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox-regression adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were calculated for the primary outcome of all-cause mortality and for the secondary outcomes of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and the composite outcome of CV death or hospitalization. Competing-risk regression analyses were performed to calculate the cumulative risk of stroke, major bleeding, AF- or HF-hospitalizations adjusted for the competing risk of all-cause death. Spline curve models were fitted to investigate associations of HbA1c values and mortality among patients with AF and DM. RESULTS: In total 1109 AF patients were included, of whom 373 (33.6%) had DM. During a median follow-up of 2.6 years, 414 (37.3%) patients died. The presence of DM was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (aHR = 1.40 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.11-1.75), CV mortality (aHR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.07-1.81), sudden cardiac death (aHR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.19-2.52), stroke (aHR = 1.87, 95% CI 1.01-3.45) and the composite outcome of hospitalization or CV death (aHR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.06-1.53). In AF patients with comorbid DM, the spline curves showed a positive linear association between HbA1c levels and outcomes, with values 7.6-8.2% being independent predictors of increased all-cause mortality, and values < 6.2% predicting significantly decreased all-cause and CV mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of DM on top of AF was associated with substantially increased risk for all-cause or CV mortality, sudden cardiac death and excess morbidity. HbA1c levels lower than 6.2% were independently related to better survival rates suggesting that optimal DM control could be associated with better clinical outcomes in AF patients with DM.