Terbuthylazine herbicide: an alternative to atrazine for weed control in glyphosate-tolerant maize.

It is proposed that the herbicide terbuthylazine is more effective than atrazine in controlling weeds in maize. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of terbuthylazine and atrazine in a mixture with glyphosate in glyphosate-tolerant maize for post-emergence application. The experiment was conducted over three trials using randomized blocks with 4 repetitions and 10 treatments, composed by terbuthylazine rates + glyphosate, atrazine rates + glyphosate, [atrazine + mesotrione] + glyphosate, atrazine + tembotrione, isolated glyphosate, and nontreated control. Trial 1 were infested with Bidens subalternans DC. and Commelina benghalensis L; trial 2 with Urochloa plantaginea (Link) R. D. Webster, Ipomoea spp., volunteer soybean, B. subalternans, and grasses; and trial 3 infestation with C. benghalensis, U. plantaginea, Ipomoea spp., volunteer soybean, B. subalternans, Amaranthus hybridus L., and grasses. Weed control, crop injury, and yield were evaluated. Terbuthylazine + glyphosate showed an efficacy equivalent to that of atrazine or [atrazine + mesotrione] + glyphosate in the control of broadleaves and C. benghalensis. In contrast, the efficacy of terbuthylazine was similar or greater than that observed for atrazine in controlling grasses, depending on the location. Terbuthylazine is an important partner of glyphosate in controlling weeds in maize and is an alternative to atrazine.

Herbicide efficacy in the fall management of Richardia brasiliensis, Commelina benghalensis, Conyza sumatrensis AND Digitaria insularis

Other herbicides, alone or in combination with glyphosate, may be effective in controlling Richardia brasiliensis, Commelina benghalensis, Conyza sumatrensis e Digitaria insularis. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of herbicides, alone or in combination, in the control of these weeds in the off-season. Three composite experiments were conducted by applying herbicides, alone or in combinations. Experiments 1 and 2 were conducted in Palotina, State of Paraná (PR), Brazil. Experiment 3 in Iporã, PR, Brazil. The three during fall 2017 in fallow areas after soybean harvest. The experiment was a randomized complete block design with 4 replications and weed control at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 days after application (DAA). The control of R. brasiliensis and C. benghalensis was evaluated in the three experiments, the control of C. sumatrensis, in experiments 1 and 2, while the control of D. insularis was evaluated only in experiment 3. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and F-test (p < 0.05). The treatment means values of experiments 1 and 2 were compared by Tukey's test (p < 0.05), and the treatment mean values of experiment 3 were grouped by the Scott and Knott test (p < 0.05). Some herbicide combinations were effective in controlling R. brasiliensis, C. benghalensis, in a single or sequential application. Herbicide combinations were effective in controlling C. sumatrensis with sequential application. Herbicide combinations in a single application did not provide satisfactory final control (≥ 80%) for D. insularis.