Evolution of osteopenia in inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was the assessment of frequency and evolution of osteopenia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and identification of related factors. METHODS: Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured in 54 patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and in 49 patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and was repeated after a mean observation period of 21 (range, 8-50) months in 30 CD and 14 UC patients. Eighteen age-matched healthy subjects served as controls. Serum biochemistry (parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, alkaline phosphatase, insulin-like growth factor 1, minerals, and markers of inflammation) was assessed at the time of the second BMD measurement. RESULTS: Reduced BMD values were found in 48% of CD, and in 38% of UC patients. Compared with control subjects, the mean BMD was significantly lower in CD (p < 0.003) and UC (p < 0.0001) patients. BMD was positively correlated with the body mass index (p < 0.05) and inversely correlated with the lifetime steroid dose (p < 0.03). After 21 months the BMD of CD patients was virtually unchanged, with an annual variation (%deltaBMD/yr) of -0.31 +/- 0.49, whether treated with steroids or not, whereas in UC patients the BMD decreased significantly (p < 0.02) with a %deltaBMD/yr of -2.47 +/- 0.82 (p < 0.02 vis CD). This decrease can be attributed to steroid treatment. No biochemical alterations were detected in patients with rapid bone loss, compared with those with stable BMD. CONCLUSIONS: Low bone density is frequent in both CD and UC, but apparently stable in CD. The evolution of BMD suggests that low bone density is associated with the pathogenesis of CD, whereas in UC it seems to be correlated with the side effects of corticosteroid treatment.

Calcaneal ultrasound bone densitometry in inflammatory bowel disease--a comparison with double x-ray densitometry of the lumbar spine.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to measure ultrasound (US) densitometric parameters [Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation (BUA), Speed of Sound (SOS), and stiffness of the os calcis] in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and to compare the results with those obtained with conventional x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine. METHODS: Twenty-two patients with Crohn's disease (13 with ileal and nine with ileocolonic disease), 11 patients with ulcerative colitis (eight with left-sided and three with pancolitis), and 18 healthy controls. US densitometry of the right heel and DXA of the lumbar spine were performed within the same day. RESULTS: Compared to controls, IBD patients had significantly lower values with both methods, US and DXA. Forty-nine percent of patients had a lumbar T score below -1. Calcaneal SOS and stiffness of these patients were significantly reduced (p < 0.03 and p < 0.05, respectively). Positive significant correlations were found between lumbar DXA and calcaneal US parameters. Lumbar bone density and calcaneal US stiffness correlated inversely with the lifetime prednisone intake (p < 0.03 andp < 0.05, respectively), but not with age or duration of disease. A cut-off level of 80 dB/MHz for calcaneal BUA predicted axial osteopenia correctly in 74%, but some underestimation of spinal BMD was observed, especially in female patients with Crohn's disease. CONCLUSION: US evaluation of the os calcis gives results similar to those of conventional DXA and therefore may be used for screening IBD patients for axial osteoporosis. Because US does not expose patients to radiation, repeated measurements are possible and may be used to assess short term variations and the effect of treatment of IBD-associated bone disease.

Decrease of bone formation in adult women with fragility fractures.

OBJECTIVES: To compare bone mineral density (BMD) and some markers of bone metabolism in women with fragility fractures and in normal age-matched subjects. METHODS: A 100 women with at least one vertebral deformity > 25%, and 219 age-, BMI- and parity-matched healthy women, were recruited for the study. In all the patients fractures were symptomatic and occurred at least 1 year before densitometric measurement. Forearm bone mineral density (BMD) as well as biochemical assessment of some markers of bone turnover were measured in all the subjects. RESULTS: BMD was significantly lower in the fracture than in the control group (0.326 +/- 0.073 vs. 0.379 +/- 0.079; P < 0.001). Fractured women showed alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC) serum levels significantly lower than controls, while no differences were found in fasting urinary calcium and hydroxyproline excretion. Women without fractures showed a significant correlation between ALP and both age and years since menopause (YSM). Such a correlation is lacking in the fracture group. CONCLUSIONS: Women with vertebral deformities likely due to a fracture had a forearm BMD and markers of bone formation lower than normal. Whether low bone density is due to a low peak of bone mass or to an increased postmenopausal bone loss sustained by an uncoupling between the two bone remodelling processes is still unclear.

Different rates of forearm bone loss in healthy women with early or late menopause.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether healthy women with early or late menopause have different rates of age- and menopause-related bone loss, and whether premature menopause really represents a risk factor for osteopenia. Healthy women aged from 27 to 84 years (n = 2204), with no history of fractures, were divided into two groups according to their age at menopause (AAM): group A with AAM < or = 43, and group B with AAM > or = 50 years. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured in the distal non-dominant forearm by single-photon absorptiometry. Group B had a significantly lower average BMD than group A (group A, 0.430 +/- 0.074 g/cm2; group B, 0.419 +/- 0.081; p = 0.003); however, the average age of group A was significantly lower, and weight and height were significantly higher. When women older than 50 years of age were divided into five age-matched subgroups, BMD was significantly lower in women with AAM < or = 43 years up to 60 years; after that age this difference disappeared and, in the oldest subgroups, BMD was significantly lower in group B than in group A. Independent variables such as age, AAM and body mass index (BMI) explain about 30% of the variation of BMD, using a multiple linear regression analysis. In both groups age and BMI weighted more than AAM in determining BMD. When BMD was plotted versus either chronological age or years since menopause, women with late menopause showed a significantly faster bone loss than those with early menopause.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)