The timing of liver resection in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases: a population-based study of current practice and survival.

AIM: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal sequence of surgery for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and synchronous liver metastases. This study was designed to describe temporal trends and inter-hospital variation in surgical strategy, and to compare long-term survival in a propensity score-matched analysis. METHOD: The National Bowel Cancer Audit dataset was used to identify patients diagnosed with primary CRC between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2015 who underwent CRC resection in the English National Health Service. Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to identify those with synchronous liver-limited metastases who underwent liver resection. Survival outcomes of propensity score-matched groups were compared. RESULTS: Of 1830 patients, 270 (14.8%) underwent a liver-first approach, 259 (14.2%) a simultaneous approach and 1301 (71.1%) a bowel-first approach. The proportion of patients undergoing either a liver-first or simultaneous approach increased over the study period from 26.8% in 2010 to 35.6% in 2015 (P < 0.001). There was wide variation in surgical approach according to hospital trust of diagnosis. There was no evidence of a difference in 4-year survival between the propensity score-matched cohorts according to surgical strategy: bowel first vs simultaneous [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80-1.06)] or bowel first vs liver first [HR 0.99 (95% CI: 0.82-1.19)]. CONCLUSION: There is evidence of wide variation in surgical strategy in dealing with CRC and synchronous liver metastases. In selected patients, the simultaneous and liver-first strategies have comparable long-term survival to the bowel-first approach.

Impact of hepatobiliary service centralization on treatment and outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer and liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Centralization of specialist surgical services can improve patient outcomes. The aim of this cohort study was to compare liver resection rates and survival in patients with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases limited to the liver diagnosed at hepatobiliary surgical units (hubs) with those diagnosed at hospital Trusts without hepatobiliary services (spokes). METHODS: The study included patients from the National Bowel Cancer Audit diagnosed with primary colorectal cancer between 1 April 2010 and 31 March 2014 who underwent colorectal cancer resection in the English National Health Service. Patients were linked to Hospital Episode Statistics data to identify those with liver metastases and those who underwent liver resection. Multivariable random-effects logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio of liver resection by presence of specialist hepatobiliary services on site. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 4547 patients, 1956 (43·0 per cent) underwent liver resection. The 1081 patients diagnosed at hubs were more likely to undergo liver resection (adjusted odds ratio 1·52, 95 per cent c.i. 1·20 to 1·91). Patients diagnosed at hubs had better median survival (30·6 months compared with 25·3 months for spokes; adjusted hazard ratio 0·83, 0·75 to 0·91). There was no difference in survival between hubs and spokes when the analysis was restricted to patients who had liver resection (P = 0·620) or those who did not undergo liver resection (P = 0·749). CONCLUSION: Patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous metastases limited to the liver who are diagnosed at hospital Trusts with a hepatobiliary team on site are more likely to undergo liver resection and have better survival.

Variation in referral practice for patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Half of patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastases. There remains great variability between hospitals in rates of liver resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLM). This study aimed to determine how many patients with potentially resectable CLM are not seen by specialist liver surgeons. METHODS: Patients presenting with new CLM in a cancer network consisting of a tertiary centre and seven attached hospitals were studied prospectively over 12 months. Data were collected retrospectively for patients who did not have a complete data set. Outcomes for patients referred to the liver tertiary centre were collated. The radiology of tumours deemed inoperable by the local colorectal specialist teams was reviewed by specialist liver surgeons and radiologists. RESULTS: In total, 631 patients with CLM were assessed. Prospective data were complete for 241 patients, and 64 (26.6 per cent) of these were referred to the specialist liver team for consideration of resection. No decision was documented for 16 patients (6.6 per cent). Of those not referred, 30 (18.6 per cent) were deemed unfit or refused and 131 (81.4 per cent) were thought inoperable. Referral rates varied between hospitals (13-43.6 per cent). Of 131 patients deemed fit but inoperable by the colorectal specialist teams, 38 (29.0 per cent) were deemed operable and 20 (15.3 per cent) had equivocal imaging when assessed retrospectively by liver specialists. In total, 142 of the 631 patients were referred to liver specialists for consideration of treatments, and 107 (75.4 per cent) treated with curative intent. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of patients with potentially resectable CLM are not assessed by specialist liver teams. Improved referral rates could greatly improve resection rates for CLM, which may improve outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer.

Synchronous resection of colorectal cancer and liver metastases: comparative views of colorectal and liver surgeons.

AIM: The optimal management of patients presenting with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases is controversial. This survey was intended to summarize the opinions of UK colorectal and liver surgeons on the specific issues pertaining to synchronous resection. METHOD: A validated electronic survey was sent to the consultant members of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons (AUGIS). The questions were structured to allow direct comparison between the two groups of the responses obtained. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-four specialist colorectal surgeons and 52 specialist hepatobiliary surgeons were identified from the register of their respective associations. Responses were obtained from 133 (31%) colorectal and 22 (42%) liver surgeons. A majority of both groups of surgeons felt that synchronous resection was a valid therapeutic option. A majority of both groups believed that synchronous resection was justified despite the options of laparoscopic surgery and enhanced recovery programmes for each discipline. Agreed possible advantages of synchronous resections were: a decrease in the overall length of hospital stay, cost and patient anxiety. The major concern about synchronous resections was an excessive overall physiological insult. Specific scenarios indicated that synchronous resection was favoured for major/complex major colorectal resection with minor liver resection or most colorectal resections not involving an anastomosis with either a minor or major liver resection. CONCLUSION: Although significant concerns relating to synchronous resection remain amongst colorectal and liver surgeons, a majority of them felt that synchronous resections could be offered to appropriately selected patients.

Laparoscopic appendicectomy: calculating the cost.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic appendicectomy is a commonly performed procedure presenting a considerable cost burden. Given the additional operative costs of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy, it is not clear whether the national tariffs are appropriate for laparoscopic appendicectomy. We conducted a study to establish the institutional costs, and to determine whether re-imbursement according to the national tariffs was sufficient. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on patients undergoing laparoscopic appendicectomy within Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust. Theatre and bed costs were obtained. Cost analysis was performed, and costs were compared to the re-imbursement due. RESULTS: Fifty laparoscopic appendicectomies were performed. Median operative time was 60 min. The median total operative cost of laparoscopic appendicectomy was pound906. Median equipment cost for laparoscopically completed cases was pound254. Median total in-patient cost was pound1617 (range, pound880- pound3360). This compared with a mean re-imbursement of pound1981 representing a cost benefit of pound233 per case (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a liberal use of disposable equipment, laparoscopic appendicectomy can still be performed within the confines of the national tariffs. There is a considerable variation in the cost of this procedure, and it may be possible to reduce costs by more stringent use of disposable equipment and standardising recovery protocols.

The impact of spontaneous tumour perforation on outcome following colon cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The impact of spontaneous tumour perforation on survival following surgery for colon cancer is unclear. This study compares survival outcomes for patients with perforated colonic cancer with stage-matched nonperforated cancer. METHOD: A prospective histological database was searched for all patients undergoing resection for adenocarcinoma of the colon between 1996 and 2002. Patients with T4 cancer were selected and classified into those with spontaneous perforation at the tumour site and those with nonperforated tumour. Patients with synchronous colonic and rectal cancers, familial polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease, iatrogenic or remote colonic perforation were excluded. Histological variables were combined with clinical data obtained by case note review. Data were analysed for differences in demographics, histological variables, operative mortality, disease-free and overall survival. Multivariate analysis of factors predictive of overall survival in both groups was performed. RESULTS: Of 960 patients identified, 52 patients had spontaneous tumour perforation and 82 patients served as the T-stage matched control group. Overall survival at 2 years was 47% and 54% and at 5 years was 28% and 33% for perforated and nonperforated cancers respectively. Patients with perforated cancers were more likely to present with metastatic disease and undergo emergency surgery with a higher 30-day mortality. There was a trend towards reduced overall survival in the perforated group (P = 0.06), but no difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.43). On multivariate testing, 'emergency surgery' and 'age >75 years' were the only independent predictors of mortality in the perforated and nonperforated group respectively. CONCLUSION: Both perforated and nonperforated T4 colon cancers have a poor prognosis. Spontaneous perforation of the cancer is associated with reduced overall survival, due to higher 30-day mortality, but in itself does not appear to significantly impact on disease-free survival. Rather, it is the advanced oncological stage at which perforated cancers present that determines outcome.

Predictors for acute and chronic pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the cumulative incidence, onset and risk predicting factors for acute and chronic pouchitis. METHOD: A consecutive series of patients (n = 210), who underwent restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) and had a minimum follow-up of 12 months was reviewed. The cumulative incidence and onset of pouchitis was determined. Univariate analysis, followed by logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of various demographic, clinical and histopathologic variables with the subsequent development of acute and chronic pouchitis. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included. The mean follow-up was 64 months (range, 12-180). Sixty-four patients (32%) developed pouchitis, 35 acute and 29 chronic. The first episode of pouchitis occurred within the first year in 70% of cases. The presence of backwash ileitis (OR, 2.6; P = 0.015), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; OR, 2; P = 0.018) and the duration of follow-up (OR, 1.1; P = 0.043) were associated with a higher incidence of pouchitis. The duration of follow-up was the only variable associated with acute pouchitis (P = 0.007). The presence of backwash ileitis and PSC were independent risk factors for chronic pouchitis (OR, 5.9; P < 0.001; OR, 2.8; P = 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION: Pouchitis is a heterogeneous disease which tends to occur early after restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. Patients with backwash ileitis and/or PSC are at considerable risk of developing chronic pouchitis. The strong association between backwash ileitis, PSC and chronic pouchitis suggests a common link in their pathogenesis.

Retroperitoneal margin involvement by adenocarcinoma of the caecum and ascending colon: what does it mean?

OBJECTIVE: Circumferential margin involvement (CRM) is a powerful predictor of local recurrence, distant metastasis and patient survival in rectal cancer. In this study, we aimed to determine the frequency of retroperitoneal margin involvement in right colon cancer and describe its relationship to tumour stage and outcome of surgical treatment. METHOD: Two hundred and twenty-eight consecutive resections for adenocarcinoma of the ascending colon and caecum were identified between 1998 and 2006. Tumour involvement of the posterior retroperitoneal surgical resection margin (RSRM) was recorded and correlated with tumour stage, grade and clinical outcome. RSRM positive patients were compared with CRM positive rectal tumours resected in the same surgical unit. RESULTS: Nineteen of 228 right hemicolectomies (8.4%) showed tumour involvement of the RSRM (defined as < or = 1 mm). Approximately half of the RSRM positive patients underwent palliative resections because of synchronous distant metastases. Out of nine 'potentially curative' resections where the RSRM was involved, five patients subsequently developed metastatic recurrence and two isolated local recurrence. RSRM positivity was associated with advanced tumour stage and more extensive extramural spread than CRM positive rectal cancers. CONCLUSION: Retroperitoneal surgical resection margin involvement by caecal and ascending colon carcinoma is a marker of advanced tumour stage and associated with a high incidence of synchronous and metachronous distant metastasis. More aggressive surgery to obtain a clear margin or postoperative radiotherapy to the tumour bed is likely to benefit only a minority of patients.

Intra-dermal methylene blue, hydrocortisone and lignocaine for chronic, intractable pruritus ani.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of intradermal methylene blue, lignocaine and hydrocortisone in cases of chronic pruritus ani refractory to standard primary, dermatological and colorectal care. METHODS: Five ml 1% methylene blue, 100 mg hydrocortisone and 15 ml 1% lignocaine were injected into the peri-anal skin of 25 patients with chronic pruritus ani which had proved refractory to standard care. Clinical and telephone follow-up was undertaken. RESULTS: After one injection of the above solution, 16 (64%) of patients were rendered symptom free. Repeat injection in those initial nonresponders ultimately rendered 22 (88%) symptom free overall. Morbidity was 4%. Treatment failure occurred in three patients (12%). CONCLUSIONS: Methylene blue used in solution with hydrocortisone and lignocaine can achieve effective control of pruritus ani in 88% of patients who have failed to respond to standard dermatological, hygiene and surgical treatments.

Recurrent septic episodes following gallstone spillage at laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

A 51-year-old woman underwent emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stone loss occurred during gallbladder dissection. Histology showed empyema of the gallbladder. Postoperatively, she developed a subhepatic abscess that required percutaneous drainage. Two years after surgery, she re-presented with a right paracolic abscess. Transsciatic CT-guided drainage of the abscess was performed. Barium enema excluded colonic pathology. Two weeks later, she developed a right gluteal abscess deep to the recent drain site. Ultrasound-guided drainage was performed followed by a sonogram. The sonogram ruled out communication with the peritoneum. Two further subhepatic abscesses occurred during the next 5 years; the first abscess was drained percutaneously, but the second required open drainage: At laparotomy, gallstone fragments were found within the abscess cavity. The site of the previous gluteal drain continued to discharge intermittently. An MRI scan showed an uncomplicated sinus track. Subsequent sinography of the right gluteal track demonstrated an opacity at the apex of the sinus. The sinus was laid open and a gallstone retrieved. The patient has remained well for 3 years. Complications due to gallstone spillage generally manifest themselves shortly after surgery. This case demonstrates that lost stones may cause chronic abdominal and abdominal wall sepsis. In cases of chronic abdominal sepsis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the possibility of lost stones should be considered even if stones are not positively shown on imaging.

Evaluation of the role of pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging in the management of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the ability of body coil magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to pre-operatively stage mural penetration, nodal status and circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 1997, MRI using a body coil was performed in consecutive patients with primary rectal carcinomas. Group A: 67 patients underwent surgery without long course neo-adjuvant therapy. Predicted tumour stage was compared to the histology of the specimen. Group B: 21 patients with MRI evidence of advanced disease, underwent long course neo-adjuvant therapy followed by repeat MRI prior to surgery. The second scan assessed response to treatment and likelihood of CRM involvement at subsequent surgery. RESULTS: Group A: Accuracy of pre-operative staging was: 'T' stage - 54%, 'N' stage - 77%, involvement of CRM by tumour - 97%. Group B: After long course neo-adjuvant therapy the second MRI scan was 95% accurate in predicting CRM involvement by tumour. CONCLUSION: In this study pre-operative rectal cancer staging with MRI and a body coil lacks accuracy in predicting mural penetration and nodal involvement. Body coil MRI can accurately predict the potential for CRM involvement. This technique may help determine which patients require long course neo-adjuvant therapy.