Gefitinib and irinotecan in patients with fluoropyrimidine-refractory, irinotecan-naive advanced colorectal cancer: a phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: To establish the recommended dose level (RDL) and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus irinotecan in patients with advanced fluoropyrimidine-refractory colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced CRC progressing on or within 12 weeks of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, irinotecan naive and performance status of two or less were recruited. During dose-finding phase, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was encountered at dose level 1, therefore subsequent dose de-escalation and pharmacokinetic (PK) studies were carried out. The RDL was then expanded in a multicentre setting to further evaluate safety and efficacy. RESULTS: From June 2002 to February 2005, 39 patients were treated in total with 27 at the RDL. The RDL was established at irinotecan 225 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks and gefitinib 250 mg daily. The DLTs were neutropenia and diarrhoea. For the patients treated at RDL, the objective tumour response rate was 11.1% (95% confidence interval 2.4% to 29.2%) and median survival was 9.3 months. PK studies indicated that the addition of irinotecan to gefitinib resulted in an average of 50% increase in exposure to gefitinib (P < 0.05), but gefitinib did not alter the PK profiles of irinotecan or SN-38. Grade 3-4 toxic effects in all patients included diarrhoea (35.9%), lethargy (15.4%), neutropenia (15.4%), febrile neutropenia (10.3%) and skin rash (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Irinotecan and gefitinib at this dose schedule was tolerable, but gefitinib did not appear to add substantial efficacy to irinotecan.

Raltitrexed plus radiotherapy for the treatment of unresectable/recurrent rectal cancer: a phase I study.

BACKGROUND: Current consensus is that a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy may provide the optimal treatment for patients with unresectable rectal cancer. Raltitrexed has proven efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer and has an acceptable toxicity profile. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with radiotherapy in patients with unresectable/recurrent rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with radiotherapy (25 fractions at 2.0 Gy per fraction) five times per week for 5 weeks. Raltitrexed was administered on days 1 and 22 at 2.0, 2.6 and 3.0 mg/m(2). RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were entered into the study. Dose-limiting toxicities were recorded in three of 20 patients following the first dose of raltitrexed; one patient at 2.6 mg/m(2) (grade 3 diarrhoea, grade 3 neutropenia and grade 2 pyrexia) and two patients at 3.0 mg/m(2) (one grade 3 neutropenia and one grade 4 diarrhoea). The most common non-haematological and haematological treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (11 of 20, two grade 3, one grade 4) and leukopenia (eight of 20, one grade 3, one grade 4), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose of raltitrexed in combination with radiotherapy for future studies is 2.6 mg/m(2).

Economic evaluation of gemcitabine alone and in combination with cisplatin in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost effectiveness of gemcitabine in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Gemcitabine was compared with best supportive care and gemcitabine/cisplatin was compared with three standard chemotherapies and four other novel chemotherapy combinations. Costs and effectiveness measures were based on resource and outcome data from previously reported clinical trials. All direct costs associated with NSCLC treatment were included and adjusted to year 2000 values. PERSPECTIVE: UK National Health Service. RESULTS: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care was associated with an incremental cost per progression-free life year gained of pound sterling5228 compared with best supportive care alone. In comparison with standard chemotherapies, gemcitabine/cisplatin was associated with an incremental cost per progression-free life year gained of pound sterling1751 versus etoposide/cisplatin and cost per 1-year survival gain of pound sterling5681 versus mitomycin/vinblastine/platinum. Incremental cost per tumour response was pound sterling2032 relative to etoposide/cisplatin, pound sterling5169 relative to mitomycin/ifosfamide/cisplatin and pound sterling6240 relative to mitomycin/vinblastine/platinum. Compared with four novel (newer) combination chemotherapies gemcitabine/ cisplatin showed cost savings in each case, with the same or better outcome. Thus, gemcitabine/cisplatin showed improved cost effectiveness and dominance. Sensitivity analyses showed the results were robust to variations to the values of key parameters. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin was assessed to be a cost-effective or cost-saving therapy when compared with best supportive care, standard chemotherapy regimens and novel chemotherapy combinations. Chemotherapy regimens containing gemcitabine therefore represent good value for money and efficient use of healthcare resources in the treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Raltitrexed ('Tomudex') and radiotherapy can be combined as postoperative treatment for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal adjuvant therapy for operable rectal cancer is likely to be a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Raltitrexed ('Tomudex') is a specific thymidylate synthase inhibitor with a convenient administration schedule, acceptable and manageable toxicity, radiosensitising properties, and proven efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. It may, therefore, offer advantages compared with standard 5-FU chemotherapy regimens used in colorectal cancer. The aim of this phase I, dose-escalation study was to determine the recommended dose of raltitrexed for use with postoperative pelvic radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resected Dukes' stage B or C rectal cancer were treated with a combination of raltitrexed and radiotherapy (50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction over five to six weeks). At least three patients were treated at each of three escalating raltitrexed dose levels (2.0, 2.6 and 3.0 mg/m2) once every three weeks. Toxicity was assessed by the recording of WHO adverse events and biochemistry and haematology determinations. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients entered the study, 17 of whom had Dukes' stage C disease. All three patients entered at a dose level of 3.0 mg/m2 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) (2 patients had grade 3 leucopenia and 1 patient had grade 2 leucopenia and grade 3 diarrhoea); however, only 2 of 1 patients entered at a dose level of 2.6 mg/m2 experienced DLT (1 patient had grade 4 neutropenia and 1 patient died probably due to aspiration pneumonia unrelated to treatment). The most common haematological toxic events were leucopenia (8 patients) and anaemia (6 patients). Only four haematological or biochemical toxic events were of grade 3 or 4. Other common toxicities were diarrhoea and nausea, which occurred in 15 and 9 patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that raltitrexed can be combined with postoperative radiotherapy for treatment of patients with Dukes' stage B or C rectal cancer. The recommended dose of raltitrexed in this setting is 2.6 mg/m2, which is close to the full monotherapy dose.

Bilateral cerebellopontine metastases in a patient with an unknown primary.

We report the case history of a patient who presented with symptoms and signs suggestive of a left cerebellopontine tumour. He underwent an exploratory posterior fossa craniotomy, which revealed metastatic adenocarcinoma. Despite intensive investigation, a primary site was not located and the patient received cranial irradiation. The patient re-presented 2 years later with further symptoms from a metastasis in the right cerebellopontine angle. He refused further intervention.

The risks of treating keloids with radiotherapy.

The risk of carcinogenesis from radiation exposure is well known. It has been questioned for some time therefore, whether it is wise to treat benign disease with radiotherapy. We report a case of a patient who developed bilateral breast carcinomas almost 30 years after treatment of chest wall keloids with radiotherapy. There are only anecdotal reports in the literature of malignancies following treatment of keloids with radiotherapy. We review these reports and discuss the safety of this approach to the management of keloid scars.

Sex hormone-binding globulin and female reproductive function.

Although sex steroids have long been known to influence serum concentrations of SHBG, it is now recognized that nutritional factors may be more important in the regulation of SHBG in women. Thus, SHBG concentrations are negatively correlated with body mass index (BMI) and, more particularly, to indices of central adiposity. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), the most common cause of anovulatory infertility, is associated with truncal obesity, hyperandrogenism and hyperinsulinaemia. There is evidence that insulin may be the humoral mediator of the weight-dependent changes in SHBG. Serum SHBG concentrations are inversely correlated with both fasting and glucose-stimulated insulin levels, and insulin has been shown to have a direct inhibitory effect on SHBG synthesis and secretion by hepatocytes in culture. However, the interrelationship of BMI, insulin and SHBG appears to be different in women with PCOS from that in normal subjects. The clinical importance of the weight-related suppression of SHBG is illustrated by the finding of a greater prevalence of hirsutism in obese women PCOS compared with their lean counterparts. Obese subjects with PCOS have similar total testosterone concentrations to lean PCO women but have lower SHBG and reciprocally higher free testosterone levels. Calorie restriction results in reduction of serum insulin followed by an increase in SHBG and a fall in free testosterone but an isocaloric, low-fat diet has no significant effect on SHBG concentrations. Weight reduction in obese, hyperandrogenaemic women with PCO is an important approach to the management of both anovulation and hirsutism.