Natural History and Outcomes of Cavernous Transformation of the Portal Vein in Cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cavernous transformation of the portal vein can occur after portal vein thrombosis (PVT). In this study, we investigated clinical complications associated with cavernous transformation in the context of cirrhosis and PVT. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort analysis, 204 patients with cirrhosis and PVT with or without cavernous transformation were identified using MUSC's Clinical Data Warehouse between January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. Complete demographic data, clinical history, and laboratory tests were abstracted from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Of 204 patients, 41 (20%) had cavernous transformation. MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson Comorbidity Index scores were similar among groups. There were no significant differences in the prevalence of esophageal varices (with or without bleeding), splenomegaly, or hepatic encephalopathy in patients with and without cavernous transformation, although ascites tended to be lower in patients with cavernous transformation (31/41 (76%) vs 142/163 (87%), p = 0.06). Patients with cavernous transformation were significantly less likely to have hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (13/41 (32%) vs 81/163 (50%), p < 0.05) and had significantly lower APRI (1.4 vs 2.0, p < 0.05) and Fib-4 (4.7 vs 6.5, p < 0.05). Patients with cavernous transformation had lower 5-year mortality (12/41 (29%) vs 81/163 (49%) died, p = 0.06). The 10-year mortality of patients with cavernous transformation without HCC was significantly lower than in those without cavernous transformation (8/28 (29%) vs 46/82 (56%), respectively, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with cavernous transformation appeared to have better outcomes than those without cavernous transformation.

An AI Approach for Identifying Patients With Cirrhosis.

GOAL: The goal of this study was to evaluate an artificial intelligence approach, namely deep learning, on clinical text in electronic health records (EHRs) to identify patients with cirrhosis. BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Accurate identification of cirrhosis in EHR is important for epidemiological, health services, and outcomes research. Currently, such efforts depend on International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes, with limited success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We trained several machine learning models using discharge summaries from patients with known cirrhosis from a patient registry and random controls without cirrhosis or its complications based on ICD codes. Models were validated on patients for whom discharge summaries were manually reviewed and used as the gold standard test set. We tested Naive Bayes and Random Forest as baseline models and a deep learning model using word embedding and a convolutional neural network (CNN). RESULTS: The training set included 446 cirrhosis patients and 689 controls, while the gold standard test set included 139 cirrhosis patients and 152 controls. Among the machine learning models, the CNN achieved the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.993), with a precision of 0.965 and recall of 0.978, compared with 0.879 and 0.981 for the Naive Bayes and Random Forest, respectively (precision 0.787 and 0.958, and recalls 0.878 and 0.827). The precision by ICD codes for cirrhosis was 0.883 and recall was 0.978. CONCLUSIONS: A CNN model trained on discharge summaries identified cirrhosis patients with high precision and recall. This approach for phenotyping cirrhosis in the EHR may provide a more accurate assessment of disease burden in a variety of studies.

The relationship between portal hypertension and portal hypertensive gastropathy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) most commonly occurs in the setting of increased portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Here, we aimed to understand the correlation between hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and the presence and severity of PHG in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We examined patients with cirrhosis who underwent HVPG measurement at the Medical University of South Carolina between 2014 and 2020. Extensive demographic, clinical, laboratory, procedural (including precise grading of PHG severity using standard definitions), and outcome data were abstracted at the time of HVPG measurement. RESULTS: Three hundred and ten patients with HVPG measurements and cirrhosis were identified. Seventy-three patients having endoscopy within 6 months of HVPG measurement were included (mean age 54 ± 11, 44% female). The most common causes of cirrhosis were alcohol (41%) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (32%). The average HVPG was 15 mmHg (±6) and 62 patients had clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) (HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg). Of the 73 patients with HVPG measured, 45 (62%) had PHG, including 40 (89%) of whom had CSPH. Out of the 45 patients with PHG, 41 and four had mild or severe PHG, respectively. MELD scores were similar in patients with and without PHG [15 ± 9 (SD) and 17 ± 9, respectively; p = .37]. HVPG was higher in patients with PHG (17 ± 7 mmHg) than those without PHG (13 ± 4 mmHg) (p = .01) but did not differ between mild and severe PHG. CONCLUSION: A weak correlation exists between HVPG level and the presence of PHG.

Prevalence and characteristics of post-gastroscopy gastric cancer: A retrospective study from an academic medical center.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastric cancer is diagnosed by endoscopy but false negative rates of up to 10% in the west and 40% in Asia have been reported. In Lebanon, little is known about the rates of post-gastroscopy gastric cancer (PGGC), defined as the proportion of patients diagnosed with gastric cancer with a negative previous examination within 2 years of diagnosis. We aimed to examine the rate of PGGC and its risk factors, clinico-pathologic and endoscopic characteristics at a University medical Center. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with histologically proven gastric malignancy over the last 14 years. Patients with history of upper endoscopy preceding the index diagnostic endoscopy by 6 to 24 months were included. RESULTS: 18,976 patients underwent upper endoscopy and gastric cancer was diagnosed in 323 (1.7%). Of those, only 4 (1.2%) had a preceding endoscopy within 6 to 24 months of diagnosis: 3 adenocarcinoma and one MALT lymphoma. Upon review of the initial endoscopy, a mucosal abnormality had been noted in all 4 patients and biopsies taken in 3 were negative for cancer. The mean time to cancer diagnosis was 8 months (range 6-13 months). CONCLUSION: A small proportion of gastric carcinomas are missed on endoscopy in this study. Patients with endoscopic evidence of mucosal abnormalities and negative biopsies should undergo repeat examination with multiple biopsies. Proper endoscopic technique, lesion recognition and adoption of performance improvement measures are important to optimize endoscopic practice.

Characteristics and outcome of patients presenting with acute Pancreatitis: A one-year descriptive study from a tertiary care center in Lebanon.

AIM: To determine the aetiology, hospital course, and outcome of patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis (AP) presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) of a tertiary care center in Lebanon. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using a retrospective cross-sectional study design, records of all patients presenting to the ED with elevated lipase over one calendar year (2016) were reviewed. Patients diagnosed with AP according to the revised Atlanta classification were identified. RESULTS: Over one year, a total of 24,133 adult patients visited the ED and 4,976 had serum lipase determination. Of those, 75 patients (mean age 59.4 ± 16.1; range 20-95; M:F 2.1) had confirmed AP accounting for 0.3% of adult ED visits. The most common etiologies were biliary (36%), idiopathic (16%), drugs (13%), and alcohol (11%). Intake of drugs known to be associated with AP was identified in 26% of patients. Alcoholic pancreatitis was more common in males, while biliary pancreatitis was more common in females (p less than 0.05 in both). 63 patients (84%) required regular hospital admission and only 1 (1.3%) required intensive care unit admission and passed away after multiorgan failure. Mean hospital stay was 4.0 ± 4.0 days (range 0-23) with mean hospital charges of $6,637 ± 8,496. CONCLUSION: Acute pancreatitis accounts for a relatively small number of emergency visits in Lebanon. Leading etiologies are biliary and drugs, with a low contribution of alcohol compared to the West. The economic burden of AP is important, but outcomes appear largely favorable with an overall mortality of less than 2%.

Incidence, outcome, and risk factors for recurrence of nosocomial Clostridioides difficile infection in adults: A prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) complicates up to 1% of all hospital admissions and is associated with considerable health burden. AIMS: To determine the incidence and outcomes of nosocomial CDI at a major University Medical Center. METHODS: Consecutive adult nosocomial CDI cases were prospectively identified. Stool samples were collected for ribotyping and antibiotic resistance testing. Patients were followed for eight weeks after discharge for relapse. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 215 patients developed nosocomial CDI (incidence 2:1000) and 200 (mean age 62.2±19.6 years) gave informed consent. Mean hospital stay was 23.3±28.9 days (range 0-278). Infection was diagnosed within 7 days of admission (range 0-95) in 129 patients (64.5%). More than two-thirds (69.0%) were previously hospitalized within 12 weeks of the index hospitalization. Twenty five percent received prior antibiotics within eight weeks. Fifty-two patients (26.0%) did not receive antibiotics prior to diagnosis. Considerable comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥8) were noted in 33.5% of patients. Recurrence occurred in 43 patients (21.5%). On multivariate logistic regression, fluoroquinolone exposure was the only predictor of recurrence (OR=2.9, 95%CI 1.1-7.7). Overall mortality was 14.0% and CCI ≥8 was the only predictor on multivariate analysis (p=0.004). Genotyping did not identify any known hypervirulent strains and all isolates were susceptible to metronidazole and vancomycin. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic exposure, comorbidities, and prior hospitalization constitute the major risk factors for nosocomial CDI. Recurrence is common and is associated with fluoroquinolones exposure. High baseline comorbidity score was the only predictor of increased mortality in this prospective cohort.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease, obesity and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: The burning questions.

Obesity is a global health epidemic with considerable economic burden. Surgical solutions have become increasingly popular following technical advances leading to sustained efficacy and reduced risk. Sleeve gastrectomy accounts for almost half of all bariatric surgeries worldwide but concerns regarding its relationship with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been a topic of debate. GERD, including erosive esophagitis, is highly prevalent in the obese population. The role of pre-operative endoscopy in bariatric surgery has been controversial. Two schools of thought exist on the matter, one that believes routine upper endoscopy before bariatric surgery is not warranted in the absence of symptoms and another that believes that symptoms are poor predictors of underlying esophageal pathology. This debate is particularly important considering the evidence for the association of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) with de novo and/or worsening GERD compared to the less popular Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedure. In this paper, we try to address 3 burning questions regarding the inter-relationship of obesity, GERD, and LSG: (1) What is the prevalence of GERD and erosive esophagitis in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery? (2) Is it necessary to perform an upper endoscopy in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery? And (3) What are the long-term effects of sleeve gastrectomy on GERD and should LSG be done in patients with pre-existing GERD?

Clinical utility and economic burden of routine serum lipase determination in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Serum lipase is a rapid and reliable laboratory test central to diagnosing acute pancreatitis (AP). Routine use in the emergency department (ED) setting for all cases of abdominal pain or as part of a standard laboratory biochemical profile may lead to unnecessary expenses. AIM: To examine the utility of serum lipase determination at a tertiary care centre ED. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study of ED patients having serum lipase determination over a 12-month period. Electronic medical records were reviewed for indication and interpretation leading to additional diagnostic imaging, specialist consultation, interventions or hospital admission. RESULTS: A total of 24 133 adult patients visited the ED during the study period: 4976 (20.6%) had serum lipase determination, 614 (12.4%) had abnormal lipase, 130 of which (21.1%) were above the diagnostic threshold for acutre pancreatitis (AP) (>3× ULN). A total of 75 patients had confirmed AP (0.3% of all adult ED visits). The positive and negative predictive values of serum lipase (>3× ULN) for AP were 43.6% and 99.6%, respectively. One thousand eight hundred and ninety patients (38.0%) had no abdominal pain on history or physical examination. In this group, the total charge associated with lipase determination was $51 030 with 251 (13.3%) elevated lipase values triggering cross-sectional abdominal imaging in 61 (24.3%) patients and unwarranted gastroenterology consultation in three (1.2%) for an additional charge of $28 975. CONCLUSIONS: Serum lipase is widely overutilised in the emergency setting resulting in unnecessary expenses and investigations. Evidence-based review of clinical guidelines and more restrictive testing can result in substantial cost savings and improved patient care.

Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux and risk factors for erosive esophagitis in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in obese individuals. Prospective studies investigating validated GERD questionnaires and clinical parameters at identifying erosive esophagitis (EE) in this population are limited. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively evaluate the prevalence of GERD in obese patients considered for bariatric surgery and identify risk and predictive factors for EE. METHODS: Eligible patients completed two validated questionnaires: GERDQ and Nocturnal Symptom Severity Impact (N-GSSIQ) before routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy. RESULTS: 242 consecutive patients were enrolled (130 females; mean age 37.8 ± 11.8 years; mean BMI 40.4 ± 5.3 kg/m2). The overall prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux (GERDQ ≥ 8, EE and/or PPI use) was 62.4%. EE was identified in 82 patients (33.9%) including 13/62 (21.0%) receiving PPIs at baseline. Multivariate logistic regression identified GERDQ ≥ 8 (OR = 6.3, 95%CI 3.0-13.1), hiatal hernia (OR = 4.2, 95%CI 1.6-10.7), abnormal Hill grade (OR = 2.7, 95%CI 1.4-5.4), and tobacco use (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.2-4.9) as independent risk factors for EE. A pre-endoscopic composite assessment including GERDQ ≥ 8 and presence of severe nocturnal reflux symptoms had 90% specificity and 20.7% sensitivity in identifying EE (NPV 68.9% and PPV 51.5%). CONCLUSION: GERD is highly prevalent in obese patients. Anthropometric data and GERD questionnaires have limited accuracy at predicting erosive disease. Pre-operative endoscopic assessment in this population appears warranted.