Chaperone function of two small heat shock proteins from maize.

Small heat shock proteins (sHsps) are molecular chaperones that protect cells from the effect of heat and other stresses. Some sHsps are also expressed at specific stages of development. In plants different classes of sHsps are expressed in the various cellular compartments. While the Class I (cytosolic) sHsps in wheat and pea have been studied extensively, there are fewer experimental data on Class II (cytosolic) sHsps, especially in maize. Here we report the expression and purification of two Class II sHsps from Zea mays ssp. mays L. (cv. Oh43). The two proteins have almost identical sequences, with the significant exception of an additional nine-amino-acid intervening sequence near the beginning of the N-terminus in one of them. Both ZmHsp17.0-CII and ZmHsp17.8-CII oligomerize to form dodecamers at temperatures below heat shock, and we were able to visualize these dodecamers with TEM. There are significant differences between the two sHsps during heat shock at 43°C: ZmHsp17.8-CII dissociates into smaller oligomers than ZmHsp17.0-CII, and ZmHsp17.8-CII is a more efficient chaperone with target protein citrate synthase. Together with the previous observation that ZmHsp17.0-CII but not ZmHsp17.8-CII is expressed during development, we propose different roles in the cell for these two sHsps.

High level transgenic expression of soybean (Glycine max) GmERF and Gmubi gene promoters isolated by a novel promoter analysis pipeline.

BACKGROUND: Although numerous factors can influence gene expression, promoters are perhaps the most important component of the regulatory control process. Promoter regions are often defined as a region upstream of the transcriptional start. They contain regulatory elements that interact with regulatory proteins to modulate gene expression. Most genes possess their own unique promoter and large numbers of promoters are therefore available for study. Unfortunately, relatively few promoters have been isolated and characterized; particularly from soybean (Glycine max). RESULTS: In this research, a bioinformatics approach was first performed to identify members of the Gmubi (G.max ubiquitin) and the GmERF (G. max Ethylene Response Factor) gene families of soybean. Ten Gmubi and ten GmERF promoters from selected genes were cloned upstream of the gfp gene and successfully characterized using rapid validation tools developed for both transient and stable expression. Quantification of promoter strength using transient expression in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) cotyledonary tissue and stable expression in soybean hairy roots showed that the intensity of gfp gene expression was mostly conserved across the two expression systems. Seven of the ten Gmubi promoters yielded from 2- to 7-fold higher expression than a standard CaMV35S promoter while four of the ten GmERF promoters showed from 1.5- to 2.2-times higher GFP levels compared to the CaMV35S promoter. Quantification of GFP expression in stably-transformed hairy roots of soybean was variable among roots derived from different transformation events but consistent among secondary roots, derived from the same primary transformation events. Molecular analysis of hairy root events revealed a direct relationship between copy number and expression intensity; higher copy number events displayed higher GFP expression. CONCLUSION: In this study, we present expression intensity data on 20 novel soybean promoters from two different gene families, ubiquitin and ERF. We also demonstrate the utility of lima bean cotyledons and soybean hairy roots for rapid promoter analyses and provide novel insights towards the utilization of these expression systems. The soybean promoters characterized here will be useful for production of transgenic soybean plants for both basic research and commercial plant improvement.

A soybean (Glycine max) polyubiquitin promoter gives strong constitutive expression in transgenic soybean.

The success of plant genetic transformation relies greatly on the strength and specificity of the promoters used to drive genes of interest. In this study, we analyzed gfp gene expression mediated by a polyubiquitin promoter (Gmubi) from soybean (Glycine max) in stably transformed soybean tissues. Strong GFP expression was observed in stably transformed proliferative embryogenic tissues. In whole transgenic plants, GFP expression was observed in root tips, main and lateral roots, cotyledons and plumules in young plants as well as in leaf veins, petioles, flower petals, pollen, pods and developing seeds in mature plants. GFP expression was localized mainly in epidermal cells, leaf mesophyll, procambium and vascular tissues. Introduction of an intron-less version of the Gmubi promoter (Gmupri) displayed almost the same GFP expression pattern albeit at lower intensities. The Gmubi promoter showed high levels of constitutive expression and represents an alternative to viral promoters for driving gene expression in soybean.

Isolation of two highly active soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) promoters and their characterization using a new automated image collection and analysis system.

A novel automated image collection and analysis system was used to compare two new soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) promoters with the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (CaMV35S) promoter, which was used as an expression standard. For expression comparisons, various permutations of a soybean polyubiquitin (Gmubi) promoter, a soybean heat shock protein 90-like (GmHSP90L) promoter and the CaMV35S promoter were placed upstream of a green fluorescent protein (gfp) gene. DNA constructs were introduced via particle bombardment into excised cotyledons of germinating lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus L.) seeds, which were arranged in Petri dishes for automated image capture and image analysis. The automated system allowed monitoring and quantification of gfp gene expression in the same piece of tissue over time. The Gmubi promoter, with its intronic region intact, showed the highest expression that was over five times stronger than the CaMV35S promoter. When an intronic region was removed from the Gmubi promoter, GFP expression was reduced, but was still over two times greater than with the CaMV35S promoter. The full-length soybean GmHSP90L promoter was four times stronger than the CaMV35S promoter. Truncation of the GmHSP90L promoter resulted in stepwise decreases in promoter strength, which appear to correspond to removal of regulatory elements. Automated image capture and analysis allowed the rapid and efficient evaluation of these new promoters.