Determination of hepatitis B virus subtypes by an enzyme immunoassay method using monoclonal antibodies to type-specific epitopes of HBsAg.

We described a Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) subtyping method based on a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of HBsAg in which the procedure was modified to include the use of monoclonal antibodies with restricted anti-HBs specificities. This method, which was able to classify HBsAg as: ayw1, ayw2, ayw3, ayw3* (intermediate between ayw3 and ayw4), ayw4, ayr, adw2, adw4 and adr, was compared to counter electrophoresis procedure (CEP) by testing HBsAg positive sera from blood donors included in a prospective national epidemiological survey. Among the 256 HBsAg positive samples tested with both techniques, 111 (43.3%) could not be subtyped with CEP vs 10 (3.9%) with our modified EIA. This difference was related to the serum HBsAg concentration which must be greater than 3000 ng/mL and 100 ng/mL for CEP and EIA, respectively. The results obtained from 145 sera with both methods were concordant. Seventeen out of 18 samples partially classified as ay with CEP were completely determined with EIA. This reliable procedure, derived from commercially available reagents, can be easily used in several applications such as large epidemiologic studies and as a substitute for nucleotide sequencing genotyping which is not adapted for large-scale screening and not applicable on samples from nonviremic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers.

Hepatitis C virus: routes of infection and genotypes in a cohort of anti-HCV-positive French blood donors.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated and analysed risk factors of HCV-infected blood donors according to HCV genotypes in order to improve the transfusion policy and safety of blood supply. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HCV-RNA was analysed in sera from 518 anti-HCV-positive blood donors, who were invited to medical consultation and interview as to risk factors by means of an extensive questionnaire. HCV genotyping was done on all samples positive for HCV-RNA. RESULTS: Of the 518 sera, 399 (77%) were HCV-RNA positive, and 394 of 399 HCV genotypes were identified. Major genotypes were 1b (34.3%), 3a (24%), 1a (19.5%) and 2 (11.4%). Of the donors, 289 (55.8%) were interviewed regarding their risk behaviour: 27% were former intravenous drug users (IVDUs), 26% had been transfused, 8% had a history of invasive diagnostic procedures, and 13% a history of surgery. Among the 224 interviewed donors, genotypes 1a and 3a were mainly associated with IVDU (51 and 45% respectively) and genotype 1b, with transfusion and nosocomial infections (40 and 25%, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this population of anti-HCV-positive blood donors, nosocomial infection may be a route of HCV spread, but the main risk factor remains IVDU, particularly in young men. The transfusion policy will improve if predonation interviews of such young men are done with a specific and sensitive questionnaire.

Efficacy of HCV core antigen detection during the preseroconversion period.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the performances of HCV core antigen (HCV Ag) testing with HCV RNA detection during the preseroconversion period. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six HCV antibody (HCV Ab)-negative and HCV RNA-positive blood samples from 6 donors and 135 serial samples from 28 patients who had undergone hemodialysis, collected a mean of 90 days before the detection of HCV Ab, were tested by ELISA for the detection of HCV Ag and by PCR to quantify HCV RNA. RESULTS: Five of the six donors were positive for HCV Ag. The donor with a negative HCV Ag test had the lowest viral load. In the hemodialysis patients, the 43 first specimens of the series were HCV RNA negative. Of the 92 specimens that were HCV RNA positive, 81 (88%) were positive for HCV Ag. Among the 74 samples with more than 10(5) RNA copies, 71 (96%) were HCV Ag positive. Average time from first viremic bleed to first HCV Ag-positive bleed was estimated at 2.0 days and that to first HCV Ab-positive bleed at 50.8 days. CONCLUSION: HCV Ag testing permits the detection of an HCV infection about 1.5 months earlier than the HCV Ab screening tests and an average of only 2 days later than quantitative HCV RNA detection in individual specimens.

HCV RNA in blood donors with isolated reactivities by third-generation RIBA.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this collaborative study was to learn the proportion of HCV RNA-positive samples obtained from a population of donors with isolated anti-HCV reactivities by third-generation RIBA (RIBA-3) (indeterminate results). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: During a 2-year period, 11 blood transfusion centers kept all samples with indeterminate RIBA-3 results to test them by PCR, using both local and commercial techniques. RESULTS: Of the 758 RIBA-3 indeterminate samples, 10 (1.3%) were positive for HCV RNA: 3. 3 percent (6/180) and 1.3 percent (4/317) of samples with anti-core or anti-NS3 reactivity, respectively, and none of the 52 and 209 samples with anti-NS4 or anti-NS5 reactivity, respectively. HCV RNA-positive donors with anti-core reactivity were infected with different subtypes (1 with HCV subtype 1b, 1 with 2, 1 with 2a/2c, 2 with 3a, and 1 with 5a), and a follow-up indicated a chronic-carrier state in two of the six donors. Acute hepatitis was diagnosed in three of the four donors with anti-NS3 reactivity alone. Two of these three were IV drug users and were infected with subtype 1a. CONCLUSION: HCV RNA-positive donors with indeterminate results in RIBA-3 are extremely rare, but they do exist. They were observed only when either anti-core or anti-NS3 was present. With such a RIBA-3 profile, PCR testing remains necessary to reveal an eventual acute or chronic HCV infection.

GB virus type C/HGV markers in HCV RNA-positive French blood donors: correlation with HCV genotypes and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to GB virus type C/HGV (GBV-C/HGV) could be determined by detection either of RNA by RT-PCR or of antibodies of the envelope protein E2. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The aim of the study was to determine the proportion of the GBV-C/HGV markers of infection in a blood donor population infected with HCV and to identify GBV-C/HGV routes of transmission that are associated with HCV genotypes and risk factors. RESULTS: Among 306 HCV RNA-positive blood donors, the proportion of GBV-C/HGV RNA-positive donors and anti-E2-positive donors was 19.3 percent (95% CI = 15.0-24.2%) and 42.1 percent (95% CI = 36.6-47.9%), respectively. Exposure to GBV-C/HGV (RNA or anti-E2) was significantly associated with the risk factor of IV drug use. There was a trend toward association with HCV subtypes 1a and 3a, probably because these HCV subtypes are the most frequent in IV drug users. No correlation was observed between ALT elevation and the presence of GBV-C/HGV RNA. CONCLUSION: In persons with HCV infection, IV drug use seems to be a major route of GBV-C/HGV transmission. Precautions taken to avoid HCV infection will probably also decrease GBV-C/HGV transmission.

Lessons from a multicentre study of the detectability of viral genomes based on a two-round quality control of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) polymerase chain reaction assay.

The aim of this study was to determine whether multicentre quality controls for the detectability of viral genomes could contribute to the improvement of diagnostic performance in the participating laboratories. The study was carried out during two successive rounds, during which 18 laboratories specialized in nucleic acid testing analyzed, through a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay, a common panel of GB virus C (GBV-C)/hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA-positive and -negative samples. During the first round, the laboratories used either an 'in-house' PCR procedure or a partly standardized commercial test. After decoding the results of the first round, the procedures of the participating laboratories were compared in order to establish a consensus procedure deduced from those of the laboratories which provided the best results. During the second round, each participating laboratory could use the resulting consensus procedure, or its own procedure, or both. The results of this quality control study indicated that, whatever method used, even specialized and trained laboratories may give false-negative or false-positive results. The commercial assay did not guarantee a systematic high quality level of results. The striking heterogeneity of results observed among laboratories using the same commercial assay confirm that molecular biology methods need skilled technicians. The results of this quality control study suggest that full standardization of viral genome detection, including all steps of the procedure, is necessary and that the laboratories performing PCR should participate in repeated quality control studies, whatever technique is being used.

Prevalence of present and past hepatitis G virus infection in a French haemodialysis centre.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies, detecting GB virus-C (GBV-C) or hepatitis G virus (HGV) RNA by using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), have shown that haemodialysis (HD) patients had a high risk of being infected and viraemic with this virus. A past GBV-C/HGV contact can now be detected by testing for antibodies directed against the GBV-C/HGV envelope protein E2 (anti-E2). METHODS: In order to evaluate GBV-C/HGV contact, 120 patients undergoing chronic HD were tested for GBV-C/HGV RNA by RT-PCR and anti-E2 antibodies by ELISA. GBV-C/HGV viraemic patients were followed prospectively for 18 months, and retrospectively when sera were stored. The total follow-up was between 18 and 78 months. RESULTS: GBV-C/HGV RNA was detected in 17 patients (14%), and 18 patients (15%) had a significant level of anti-E2 antibodies. No positive anti-E2 specimens were also positive for GBV-C/HGV RNA and vice versa. A total of 35 patients (29%) were contaminated with GBV-C/HGV. Sixteen of the 17 viraemic patients had a persistent viraemia (follow-up 18-78 months) and one cleared the virus during the study period. A past or present GBV-C/HGV contact was statistically correlated with the duration of HD and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but was independent of age, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-nine per cent of patients who underwent HD in our centre have been infected by GBV-C/HGV, 49% were still viraemic and 51% have developed anti-E2 antibodies, indicating a past contact with GBV-C/HGV. Our results demonstrate that the prevalence of GBV-C/HGV contact in HD was underestimated when only RT-PCR was used. Therefore GBV-C/HGV contact is probably much more frequent in HD than previous studies would suggest and is at this time not correlated with hepatotoxicity. Anti-HCV antibodies blood screening since 1990 and recent changes in managing HD patients have probably reduced GBV-C/HGV contact in the same way.

Genotype distribution and transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in French haemodialysed patients.

BACKGROUND: HCV genotyping was performed to identify the source of HCV infection in haemodialysed patients. METHODS: Specimens from 48 HCV-infected patients treated in the same dialysis unit were genotyped by line probe assay (LiPA). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients (77%) were infected by genotype 1b. Only four of the 48 patients were never transfused and three of them had genotype 1b. In two of the three genotype 1b-infected patients, seroconversion was observed during the follow-up , suggesting a nosocomial HCV infection. Ten of the 44 transfused patients were infected with genotypes other than 1b. Blood products were very probably the source of infection in these patients. The 34 other patients (77.3%) were infected with genotype 1b and retrospective analysis failed to identify nosocomial and transfusional origin. Eight of the 11 patients with genotypes different from 1b were found in the 16 patients who were more than 55 years old. Only three of the eight originated from France. CONCLUSION: Blood transfusions and nosocomial infections were the main causes of HCV transmission in haemodialysed patients. Both screening of blood donors and aseptic measures in haemodialysis units may prevent HCV transmission.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in haemodialysed patients: HCV-RNA and anti-HCV antibodies (third-generation assays).

Samples from 128 haemodialysed patients were tested by anti-HCV 2nd- and 3rd-generation assays from Ortho: 53 were positive by ELISA 2.0 and 54 (42%) by ELISA 3.0. The 54 anti-HCV-positive patients were tested by RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 and by PCR for the detection of HCV-RNA: 46 of the 47 patients (98%) reactive by RIBA-2 and 48 of the 51 patients (94%) reactive by RIBA-3 were HCV-RNA positive. Three patients with RIBA-3 indeterminate results were HCV-RNA negative. Among the 74 anti-HCV negative patients, 29 were tested by PCR with negative results. Two distinct episodes of hepatitis C have been observed in two patients during the follow-up and 44 of the 50 patients (88%) known positive for anti-HCV since at least 1989 were still viraemic in 1993. A very high correlation was found between anti-HCV antibodies reactive by RIBA and the presence of HCV-RNA. A lack of protection after a resolved infection and a high frequency of chronic disease have been observed as well as a reinfection or a reactivation of the infection in two patients.

Indeterminate third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay in hepatitis C virus infection. Group d'Etudes Moléculaires des Hépatites (GEMHEP).

Third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay is widely used for the validation of the serological diagnosis of hepatitis C virus infection. To determine whether indeterminate recombinant immunoblot assay 3.0 patterns may be associated with viral replication and liver disease, 89 indeterminate patterns were studied (67 c22n 14 c33c, 5 c100p and 3 NS5); 35 (39%) had immunosuppression. Serum alanine aminotransferase activity was increased in 49 (55%); HCV RNA was evidenced through polymerase chain reaction in 52 (58%). The observation of indeterminate recombinant immunoblot assay 3.0 justifies investigation of liver disease and search for HCV RNA, since a large proportion of individuals with such patterns are hepatitis C virus-infected.

[Correlation between hepatitis C virus (HVC) RNA and anti-HVC antibodies in a hemodialysis population]. / Corrélation entre l'ARN du virus de l'hépatite C (VHC) et les anticorps anti-VHC dans une population d'hémodialysés.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was applied to detect HCV-RNA in 75 hemodialyzed patients. Anti-HCV status was determined by ELISA-2 and by RIBA-2 for reactive samples by ELISA. ALT levels were monthly determined during the year preceding the end of the study. For 60 patients, anti-HCV serology was known since 1989 and 39 of them were tested for the presence of HCV-RNA at least four times during the 2 preceding years. The 9 patients who were negative for anti-HCV antibodies were negative by PCR. Of the 7 patients with an indeterminate profile by RIBA-2, 3 were positive by PCR: 1/1 with C-33c band only and 2/6 with C22-3 band only. Of the 59 patients reactive by RlBA-2, 57 were HCV-RNA positive. Of the 2 HCV-RNA negative patients, one had been PCR positive before interferon therapy. Of the 38 patients without acute hepatitis tested by PCR on 5 successive samples, all the specimens of 11 and 23 patients were HCV-RNA negative and HCV-RNA positive respectively. In 4 patients, a transient viremia was observed. The group of HCV-RNA positive patients had mean ALT levels greater than those who were negative. A correlation was established between HCV infection and both the time on dialysis and the number of blood transfusions. A high concordance (97%) was observed between antibodies to HCV and HCV-RNA.

Detection of hepatitis C virus by polym erase chain reaction in haemodialysed patients in relationship to anti-HCV status.

HCV RNA was determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 41 haemodialysed patients with a known anti-HCV status (ELISA and RIBA-2) and a monthly alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level determination. No histological examination of the liver tissue was available. Four samples from each patient were collected at 6 month intervals for 18 months. Seven patients negative for anti-HCV during the entire follow-up gave negative PCR results on the four samples. Two patients who were anti-HCV-negative upon entry into the study seroconverted to HCV during follow-up. HCV RNA was detected during the acute phase of hepatitis. HCV RNA was no longer detectable after antiviral therapy was administered to one patient. Out of 27 anti-HCV-positive patients, 24 had persistent viraemia, 2 had transient viraemia (1 sample PCR-negative and 3 samples PCR-positive) and 1 was PCR-negative on the 4 samples. Thirteen of the 26 viraemic patients had a normal ALT level during the preceding 3 years. Three patients with a C22-3 band alone by RIBA-2 were negative by PCR, whereas two patients with a C33-c band alone were PCR-positive on the four samples. These results suggest that HCV viraemia was strongly associated with anti-HCV in haemodialysed patients with or without biological hepatitis.

No evidence of HIV-1 infection in seronegative hemophiliacs and in seronegative partners of seropositive hemophiliacs through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and anti-NEF serology.

We prospectively studied a well-characterized cohort including 60 seronegative hemophiliacs or von Willebrand's disease patients, 6 seronegative female sexual partners of seropositive hemophiliacs, 59 seropositive hemophiliacs or von Willebrand's disease patients and 2 seropositive partners of seropositive hemophiliacs (used as positive controls), and 117 seronegative low risk individuals (used as negative controls). PCR assay, performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells using three primer pairs in the gag, pol, LTR regions, showed no positive results in the 60 seronegative patients, in the 6 seronegative partners of seropositive patients and in the 117 seronegative low risk individuals, while PCR was positive with at least one primer pair in 53 (87%) of 61 seropositive patients. Anti-nef serology (Western-blot) was negative in seronegative patients, in seronegative partners of seropositive patients and positive in 58% out of the seropositive individuals. These results strongly suggest an absence of HIV-1 infection in individuals with a lastingly negative HIV serology.

[Hepatitis B virus DNA as a marker of viral multiplication: comparison with HBe antigen and anti-HBe antibody]. / L'ADN du virus de l'hépatite B comme marqueur de multiplication virale: comparaison avec l'antigène HBe et l'anticorps anti-HBe.

We have used D A-DNA hybridization techniques with a spot test procedure for the detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in the serum of 156 HBsAg positive patients with chronic active hepatitis and 75 asymptomatic chronic carriers of the virus. The results were compared with those of HBeAg and anti HBe tests. HBV DNA was detected in the serum of 107 of the 132 (81%) HBeAg positive and 6 of the 24 (25%) anti HBe positive patients with chronic hepatitis. A semi-quantitative estimation of the amount of viral particles showed a marked heterogeneity among the positive sera. HBV DNA was not detected in the serum of 25 patients despite HBeAg positivity: serial samples were available for 13 of these subjects and HBe became undetectable in 9 cases after 6 to 12 months. Among the 75 anti HBe positives asymptomatic carriers HBV DNA was detected in 3 (4%). It appears that HBV DNA detection in the serum is a much more sensitive and direct assay for HBV multiplication than the HBeAg and anti HBe tests.