Prognostic Factors of Long-Term Outcomes after Primary Chemo-Radiotherapy in Non-Metastatic Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An International Bicentric Cohort.

Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is a rare malignancy with a rising incidence associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. The locally advanced disease is associated with a 30% rate of treatment failure after standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT). We aimed to elucidate the prognostic factors for ASCC after curative CRT. A retrospective multicenter study of 176 consecutive patients with ASCC having completed CRT treated between 2010 and 2017 at two centers was performed. Complete response (CR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank tests. The hierarchical clustering on principal components (HCPC) method was employed in an unsupervised and multivariate approach. The CR rate was 70% and was predictive of DFS (p < 0.0001) and OS (p < 0.0001), where non-CR cases were associated with shorter DFS (HR = 16.5, 95% CI 8.19-33.21) and OS (HR = 8.42, 95% CI 3.77-18.81) in a univariate analysis. The median follow-up was 38 months, with a 3-year DFS of 71%. The prognostic factors for DFS were cT1-T2 (p = 0.0002), N0 (p = 0.035), HIV-positive (p = 0.047), HIV-HPV coinfection (p = 0.018), and well-differentiated tumors (p = 0.037). The three-year OS was 81.6%. Female sex (p = 0.05), cT1-T2 (p = 0.02) and well-differentiated tumors (p = 0.003) were associated with better OS. The unsupervised analysis demonstrated a clear segregation of patients in three clusters, identifying that poor prognosis clusters associated with shorter DFS (HR = 1.74 95% CI = 1.25-2.42, p = 0.0008) were enriched with the locally advanced disease, anal canal location, HIV-HPV coinfection, and non-CR. In conclusion, our results reinforce the prognostic value of T stage, N stage, sex, differentiation status, tumor location, and HIV-HPV coinfection in ASCC after CRT.

Safety and efficacy of high-dose clobetasol propionate 0.05% in cutaneous lichen planus.

Cutaneous lichen planus is a highly pruritic dermatosis with an unmet need in its management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect and tolerance of high doses of clobetasol propionate 0.05% in cutaneous lichen planus. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study from 2017 to 2021. All adults treated with high-dose (>5 g/day) clobetasol propionate 0.05% for cutaneous lichen planus were included. Patients with less than 10% affected body surface area at initial presentation or who received concomitant systemic therapy were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete remission by week 16. Secondary endpoints included maximum daily and median cumulative doses, reduction in pruritus and occurrence of adverse events. Fifty-seven patients, 60% female, with a mean age of 48 years (min-max,18-83) were included. Cutaneous lichen planus had been present for a median duration of 2 months at initial presentation (min-max, 1-4) and involved a median body surface area of 27%. Pruritus was reported by 55/57 (96%) patients. At week 16, 41/57 (72%) patients had achieved complete remission without treatment modification, among whom 25/41 (61%) had achieved it at week 6. The median daily and cumulative doses were, respectively, 20 g/day (IQR, 10-20) and 560 g (IQR, 320-925). Three patients experienced mild adverse events. No statistical association was demonstrated between the duration of the disease before treatment initiation and clinical response. In conclusion, high-dose clobetasol propionate 0.05% seems to be an effective, well-tolerated, and easy-to-implement treatment for cutaneous lichen planus.

Impact of prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors on dacarbazine efficacy in metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Despite its low efficacy, chemotherapy with dacarbazine remains an option in metastatic melanoma patients after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± targeted therapy. Some observations suggested an increased efficacy of chemotherapy in melanoma or lung cancer patients previously treated with ICI; we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dacarbazine in a controlled-group study of patients pre-treated or not with ICI. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from all consecutive patients treated with dacarbazine for advanced cutaneous melanoma without brain metastasis, in our skin cancer centre between June 2006 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall response rates (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety of dacarbazine. RESULTS: Among 72 patients, 17 (23.6%) received dacarbazine after ICI and 55 (76.3%) without prior ICI. Despite less favourable prognostic factors in patients ICI-pre-treated, median PFS was 4.27 months (range 0.89-43.69) in this group versus 2.04 months (range 1.25-39.25) P = 0.03 in non-ICI-pre-treated patients; ORR were 35.3% and 12.7%, respectively. The median OS and the occurrence of adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Dacarbazine seems to offer a short-lived benefit in patients with progressive advanced disease despite ICI (±targeted therapy), and could be an alternative before considering best supportive care.