ABSTRACT
Aim: Histology is the most widely used test to detect H. pylori. PCR is less used but allows the detection of both infection and antibiotics' resistance. Methods: We conducted a monocentric cross-sectional study, collecting 97 symptomatic patients to assess the diagnostic performance of histology in the detection of H. pylori infection compared with PCR. Results: Sensitivity of histology in comparison with PCR was 81.5% and specificity was 56.3%. A history of anti-H. pylori therapy intake, as well as the density of the bacterium on the gastric sample and the presence of gastric atrophy, were significantly correlated to the PCR's result in terms of H. pylori detection. Conclusion: Thus, histology can be considered as an efficient test compared with PCR in H. pylori detection.
Helicobacter pylori is a type of bacteria that can cause diseases in the stomach and the upper part of the small intestine. A number of different methods are applied by scientists to determine if this bacterium is present. In our research, we specifically examined the accuracy of two types of tests one where doctors examine tissues under the microscope to find signs of the bacteria (pathological test), and another where they use a method called PCR to find the bacteria's genetic material. Our aim was to determine which test worked better.
