Management of adult patients with buttock and perineal burns: The Ross Tilley Burn Centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Perineal and buttock burns are challenging wounds to heal for several reasons because of the contamination risk and shear stress that is always present. Because of the nature of the wound bed, pathogens can have ready access to create systemic infections and complications. Prolonged healing times also delay the recovery for patients and add to their discomfort and psychological stress from the injury. The ideal treatment approach is not well defined, and the aims of this study were to conduct a literature review of current treatment suggestions and to look at our own patient population to determine how our center treated these challenging patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all patients treated between 2010 and 2013 at our center. Patients that received care for burns to the perineum or buttocks were evaluated. Mortalities within 24 hours of admission and transfers before completion of their care were excluded. All patients older than 18 years were included in the study. The primary outcome studied was a cause for graft revision. Secondary outcomes included benefits and risks of fecal management devices, risk of infection, and mortality. RESULTS: The literature review did not show consensus on how to best manage this patient population. Our results however demonstrated that patients treated with the fecal management device Flexi-seal (Convatec, Skillman, NJ) were at increased risk of developing an infection involving an enteric pathogen and requiring revision procedures. The patient population that was treated with this device was also older and had larger burns. The patients within this group that were treated initially with allograft required fewer revisions when compared with patients that received autograft in this group (23% vs. 34%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: After our data and the literature had been reviewed, the lack of evidence-based treatment protocols led us to create recommendations for burn surgeons with regard to the initial management of this complicated area. Certain key features include avoiding autograft at the primary excision if they have an increased revised Baux score and minimizing the amount of liquid stool contaminating the wound bed to increase success. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level IV. Therapeutic study, level V.

The use of lipofilling to treat congenital hypoplastic breast anomalies: preliminary experiences.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for congenital hypoplastic breast anomalies are often open, including radial scoring, parenchymal flaps, and insertion of expanders and implants. Drawbacks of open techniques involve scarring, the use of drains, and inpatient stays. The use of lipofilling to treat breast deformities is increasing, as more research is completed in this area. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report a retrospective study of 10 patients below the age of 20 following autologous fat transfer between January 1, 2003 and January 1, 2004. (2 Poland syndrome, 3 bilateral tuberous breast, and 5 unilateral micromastia). Age, cup size, the number of sessions, time interval between each session, volumes injected, and complications were recorded. Postoperative mammography, ultrasonography, and MRI were assessed by a specialized radiologist. Patients answered a questionnaire 1 year after the procedure. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 68 months (60-77 months) and mean age was 17.5 years (15-20 years). Mean number of fat injection sessions was 2 (1-4) and mean volume injected 285 mL per breast (200-500 mL). The time interval between each session was 5 months (3-6 months). Cup size remained unchanged after at least 5 years of follow-up. One case underwent a contralateral breast reduction. The cosmetic results considered satisfactory in almost all the patients after 1 year of follow-up. None of our patients complained of scars or defects at the donor site. All breasts imaging were normal except 1 patient with oil cysts. CONCLUSION: Our preliminary results using lipofilling to treat young patients with breast hypoplasia with lipofilling are very encouraging. The authors believe it is an alternative of choice for the correction of the young woman's breast deformities if the avoidance of scarring is preferred.

Maxillonasal osteochondral complex repair in maxillonasal dysplasia.

Surgical treatment of maxillonasal dysplasia or Binder syndrome is a challenge for surgeons. Its aim is to replace or substitute the missing or malformed anatomic structures. The authors report a comprehensive analysis for the understanding of the mechanisms resulting in the lack of maxillonasal development observed in Binder syndrome. The evolution of the surgical treatment due to facial function analysis is explained, and the surgical treatment of 20 consecutive cases over the last 20 years is reviewed, illustrated by three-dimensional reconstruction to emphasize the choice made and the results obtained. Bone grafts were always performed, and an arrow-shaped graft for the neospine reconstruction is described. This analysis allowed the authors to ameliorate patient self-image subsequently to facial contour improvement.