ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) for stroke prevention is validated in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) contraindicated to oral anticoagulation. General anesthesia (GA) is often used for procedural guidance by trans-oesophageal echocardiography (TEE); however, its use may be challenging in some patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and the mid-term efficacy of a mini-invasive LAAC strategy using micro-TEE under procedural sedation. METHODS: Comparison by propensity score of two cohorts of consecutive patients who underwent LAAC: standard TEE-guided LAAC (3D-TEE under GA) and, mini-invasive LAAC strategy (micro-TEE under procedural sedation). The primary endpoint was a composite of embolic or bleeding events, significant per-procedural complication, and cardiovascular deaths within 3 months after LAAC. RESULTS: In total, 432 patients were included (78.7±8 years old, 32.4% of women, CHA2DS2VASC score:4.9±1.1); 127 patients underwent mini-invasive LAAC strategy and were compared to 305 patients standard TEE-guided LAAC. The mini-invasive strategy was acheived in 122/127 (96.1%) planned patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 11.2% of patients from the mini-invasive LAAC strategy group and in 10.3% of patients from the standard TEE group (absolute difference = 0.9%[-6.4; 4.5], hazard-ratio=1.11[0.56; 2.19], p=0.76). Procedural times, fluoroscopy duration and hospital stays were shorter in the mini-invasive LAAC strategy group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The mini-invasive LAAC strategy is safe and effective compared to the standard TEE-guided LAAC strategy. A mini-invasive LAAC strategy may also be an important tool to help physicians to treat more patients as LAAC indications evolve in the future.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Achieving bidirectional mitral isthmus block is still challenging. Conventional ablation methods involve radiofrequency applications on the endocardial aspect of the lateral mitral isthmus, and often epicardial applications inside the coronary sinus. AIM: To evaluate the impact of the systematic use of ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall on the achievement of acute mitral isthmus block of additional epicardial component lesion. METHODS: We evaluated patients referred to two centres for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation or recurrent peri-mitral flutter. All patients had pulmonary vein isolation and mitral isthmus line using ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall for the first procedure and additional radiofrequency ablation lesion if necessary. For redo procedures, additional ablations (atrial lines and complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablations, if needed) were also performed. RESULTS: We included 149 patients, and ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall was not performed in 27 patients (18%). Among 122 patients, 115 had long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (94.2%) and seven had peri-mitral flutter (5.8%). The mean duration of continuous atrial fibrillation was 53 months before ablation. Acute bidirectional mitral isthmus block was obtained in 115 (94.2%) of the 122 patients who received ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (77% when considering the total population). The mean radiofrequency delivery time to obtain mitral isthmus block was 2.6minutes for the endocardial mitral isthmus radiofrequency ablation and 2.6minutes for the epicardial mitral isthmus radiofrequency ablation. Failure to obtain mitral isthmus block was associated with increased mitral isthmus length and left atrial dilation. No major complications related to ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall were observed. CONCLUSION: Ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall, when feasible (82%), was a safe approach to obtaining a high success rate (94%) of acute bidirectional endocardial and epicardial mitral isthmus block.
