Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hernia ; 15(6): 655-8, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21691736

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This retrospective chart review was designed to compare outcomes for open and laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias in the population over the age of 80. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for 104 patients over 80 years old who underwent inguinal hernia repair (2005-2008) at The Mount Sinai Medical Center. Patients were grouped into laparoscopic or open repair cohorts and compared accordingly. RESULTS: The open group (n = 73) and the laparoscopic group (n = 31) had mean ages of 84 and 83 years, respectively. The mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.6 for the open cohort and 2.3 for the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). Peri-operative complications in the open and laparoscopic groups were not found to be statistically significant. There was no mortality in either group. CONCLUSIONS: With octogenarians, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair can be performed as a safe alternative to open repair with comparable rates of morbidity and mortality.


Subject(s)
Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, General , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/etiology , Female , Humans , Hypotension/etiology , Laparoscopy , Length of Stay , Male , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Retention/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...