Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hypertens Pregnancy ; 28(2): 168-77, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19437227

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference between distinct methods of assessing blood pressure (BP) in pregnant women with different hypertensive disorders. METHODS: We compared office BP to home patient- and nurse-measured diastolic BP in pregnant women with essential chronic hypertension (CH), preeclampsia (PE) and isolated hypertension (IOH). RESULTS: Office BP was lower or similar to home patient- and nurse-measured BP in women with CH. Office BP was higher than home patient-measured BP in women with PE and in women with IOH (p < 0.0001). Nurse-measured BP was higher than patient-measured BP in women with PE (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: BP assessments in women with PE are significantly influenced by the environment, which should be considered in managing these women.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure , Home Care Services , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Adult , Female , Hospitals, Maternity , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/physiopathology , Obstetric Nursing , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Self Care
2.
Hypertens Pregnancy ; 26(4): 403-14, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18066959

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference between office and home blood pressure (BP) monitoring in normotensive and hypertensive pregnant women. METHODS: We compared the mean of 1 week home BP with office BP, measured by aneroid devices, in 20 normotensive women (68 BP assessments) and 100 women with mild essential chronic hypertension without superimposed gestational hypertension (429 BP assessments). Different approaches were used including the Bland-Altman method to investigate the discrepancies between office and home BP. RESULTS: Systolic office BP in normotensive women (p = 0.004) and diastolic office BP in hypertensive women (p = 0.001) were lower than home BP. The concordance between office and home BPs was better for diastolic BP than for systolic BP. Only a small number of hypertensive women presented home BP >or=135/85 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In our study population, the concurrence between office and home BPs is good with the exception of systolic BP in normotensive women. Home blood pressure measurement criteria used in nonpregnant individuals are not adequate in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/diagnosis , Pregnancy/physiology , Adult , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Birth Weight , Diastole/physiology , Female , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Infant, Newborn , Parity , Physicians' Offices , Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular/physiopathology , Pregnancy Trimesters , Prospective Studies , Sphygmomanometers , Systole/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...