Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15352689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Good reproductive health depends to a great extent on how well informed people are on contraception issues. Contrary to the situation existing in many European countries, in Greece there has been a lack of studies investigating how well informed Greek women and men are. Also, the sources on which they draw are equally important. The aim of this study was to examine the knowledge of Greek women and men on issues of contraception, with the ultimate goal of identifying which groups should be the focus of prevention planning programs. METHOD: A country-wide survey was conducted through a self-administered questionnaire. The sample, numbering 1500 people, was representative of the Greek population aged 16-45 years. RESULTS: A key finding was that only a small percentage of the respondents were able to answer correctly 50% or more of the questions on knowledge of basic contraceptive issues (30.6% of women and 14.7% of men). Regarding sources of information, media and friends were reported as the primary sources of information for men of all ages and young women. The gynecologist becomes a significant source of consultation for women only after the age of 25 years. Even then, only 4% of women visiting a gynecologist do so to obtain information on prevention of pregnancy. The majority of women asking professional advice have already experienced an unwanted pregnancy. CONCLUSION: The need for health education is apparent, especially for young people.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Information Dissemination/methods , Population Surveillance/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Greece , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urban Population
2.
Br J Cancer ; 87(1): 21-7, 2002 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12085250

ABSTRACT

Besides cytotoxicity, taxanes induce other biological effects, especially in the immune system. Taxanes have demonstrated immunostimulatory effects against neoplasms, supporting the idea that these agents suppress cancer through several mechanisms and not solely through inhibiting cell division. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) and investigate their ability in alterating important immunological parameters in breast cancer patients. Thirty women with advanced breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy were randomly assigned into two groups treated with either single agent Paclitaxel or Docetaxel. Sera from patients before the first and after the last treatment cycle and from normal donors were assayed by ELISA for IL-2, IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, GM-CSF, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and PGE2 levels. In these same blood samples, NK and LAK cell activity was tested in the total PBMC population against NK-sensitive K562 tumour targets, respectively, and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction was tested by (3)H-thymidine proliferation assays. All patients in both groups responded to therapy. Significant differences were observed in the following immune parameters between the control group of healthy blood donors and the pretreatment values of both taxane groups; IL-2, GM-CSF, IFN-gamma levels and NK and LAK cell cytotoxicity were depressed, whereas TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels were raised in breast cancer patients before treatment compared to controls. There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups regarding any of the parameters studied. Both drugs led to increases in MLR values, NK and LAK cell cytotoxicity, and IL-6, GM-CSF, IFN-gamma levels, and decreases for IL-1, TNF, and PGE2 levels. The percentage of these differences was greater for docetaxel in comparison to paclitaxel (P<0.0001). More specifically, docetaxel demonstrated a more pronounced effect on enhancing MLR, NK, LAK activity and IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-6, and GM-CSF levels, as well as caused more potent reduction in IL-1 and TNF-alpha levels when compared to paclitaxel. The present study indicates that patients responded to treatment of advanced breast cancer with single-agent paclitaxel or docetaxel leads to an increase in serum IFN-gamma, IL-2, IL-6, GM-CSF cytokine levels and enhancement of PBMC NK and LAK cell activity, while they both lead to a decrease of acute phase serum cytokine levels of IL-1 and TNF-alpha. Moreover, the effects of docetaxel are in all the above parameters more pronounced than those of paclitaxel.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/immunology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/immunology , Cytokines/analysis , Growth Substances/analysis , Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated/immunology , Paclitaxel/analogs & derivatives , Paclitaxel/immunology , Taxoids , Adult , Antibody Formation/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/therapeutic use , Cytokines/immunology , Docetaxel , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Immunity, Cellular/drug effects , Killer Cells, Lymphokine-Activated/drug effects , Middle Aged , Paclitaxel/pharmacology , Paclitaxel/therapeutic use
3.
J Chemother ; 13(6): 641-7, 2001 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11806626

ABSTRACT

We studied tropisetron (T) in patients with breast cancer receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy with CEF (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and 5-fluorouracil) over 3 consecutive cycles; T was administered alone or in combination with dexamethasone (D) or alprazolam (A). 50 women entered and during the 1st cycle patients received T i.v. before chemotherapy and the same dose orally on each of the following 3 days. In the 2nd cycle, T was administered together with D and during the 3rd cycle, T was combined with A and continued with T over the ensuing 3 days post-chemotherapy. Stress was present in 23 women and was evaluated for its impact on antiemetic response. Differences in the emetogenic response were found for nausea and vomiting mainly with the addition of A. The combination of T+A was superior to T and T+D in acute emesis (P<0.001). Concerning delayed emesis, differences were detected with both T+D and T+A (being equally effective) and superior to T alone (P<0.001). The emetogenic potential was decreased by the addition of A in comparison to T alone (P=0.001). Patients without stress had no difference, while patients with stress had a significantly better antiemetic result with the addition of D or A to T. In conclusion, T provides a satisfactory result in controlling nausea and emesis caused by moderately emetogenic CT regimens. Addition of D or A improves the antiemetic effect, and A provides better coverage in women with stress, a finding worth exploration in larger confirmatory studies.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Indoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Alprazolam/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Epirubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Indoles/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Tropisetron
4.
Anticancer Res ; 20(6C): 4777-83, 2000.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11205218

ABSTRACT

Some factors have demonstrated an influence on emesis and antiemetic response. In order to study these factors, 306 patients (pts) entered this study receiving cisplatin based combination chemotherapy (CT) (100 mg/m3, with ondansetron (8 mg, 3 times daily for 4 days) as the only antiemetic treatment. Known factors that influence the result of antiemetic therapy such as age, sex, performance status (Karnofsky), site of primary tumor, weight loss, anxiety, depression, psychological problems related to CT (psychological PRC) etc, were included in the evaluation. We evaluated the number of vomits, retches and nausea. The existence of psychological PRC was found to be a prominent factor for the development of nausea and emesis, being at the same time strongly associated with scaling variables (Gralla, retching and nausea grading) used to measure the severity of nausea and emesis (p = 0.001). Stress was also a significant predictor; patients with stress had an almost two times higher probability to develop nausea or retching compared to patients without stress indications (p = 0.001), while the occurrence of retching was marginal. Younger patients (less than 40 years old) were found to be almost three times more susceptible to retching compared to older patients (more than 40 years old) (P 0.006). With all possible evaluations, we concluded that significant factors are psychological PRC, stress and age. In conclusion, three factors, age, stress and psychological PRC, should be taken seriously into consideration in the design of future trials evaluating antiemetic treatment, as well as in the every-day clinical practice, in order to provide patients with a better quality of life during emetogenic CT.


Subject(s)
Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Nausea/prevention & control , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/psychology , Ondansetron/therapeutic use , Vomiting/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Anxiety , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Depression , Female , Humans , Likelihood Functions , Male , Middle Aged , Nausea/chemically induced , Probability , Stress, Psychological , Treatment Outcome , Vomiting/chemically induced , Weight Loss
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...