[How to reach and maintain the K/DOQI recommendations for bone and mineral metabolism in patients undergoing haemodialysis: an efficient strategy]. / Comment atteindre et maintenir les recommandations K/DOQI sur le métabolisme phosphocalcique chez les patients dialysés: une stratégie efficace.

INTRODUCTION: Recent publications have indicated that alterations in bone and mineral metabolism are known to participate to a high mortality rate in patients undergoing haemodialysis. A new therapeutic strategy is progressively undertaken in the dialysis unit over a 36 months period covering years 2002 to 2004. METHODS: This new strategy includes the prescription of non-calcium, non-aluminium phosphate binder, sevelamer hydrochloride, an increase in vitamin D analogues prescription and a moderation in calcium carbonate administration. Sixty patients participated to the entire study and are evaluated three times a year on the four K/DOQI parameters. Other indicators such as haemoglobin, bicarbonate, total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels were studied. RESULTS: At the beginning of the study, 7% of the patients achieved the four K/DOQI parameters. This proportion seemed identical to those observed in the major studies. But progressively with the new therapeutic strategy 13%, then 21%, and at the end of the study 35% reached the four criteria. Therapeutic calcium intakes decreased from 100 g per patient/month to 28 g per patient-month. Prescription of vitamin D analogues increased from 3.3 microg per patient-month to 18.3 microg per patient/month. At the end of the study 60% of the patients received sevelamer hydrochloride at the mean dosage of 4800 mg per day. Haemoglobin remains stable. Bicarbonate level decreased due to a minor prescription in calcium carbonate. Under statins the ratio total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol decreased to 3.3. CONCLUSION: A modification in the therapeutic strategy offer to patients undergoing haemodialysis, the possibility to achieve the K/DOQI recommendations with the hope to obtain a beneficial effect on patient outcomes.

Detection of vascular access stenosis by measurement of access blood flow from ionic dialysance.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The measurement of the vascular access blood flow rate (Q(a)) in chronic hemodialyzed patients was proposed to predict access thrombosis. We have recently presented a new method based on the measurements of ionic dialysance at normal and reversed positions of the blood lines. We evaluate the reliability of the measurement of Q(a) by this method in detecting significant access stenoses. METHODS: Twenty-five patients on chronic hemodialysis and having a vascular access cannulated with two needles were studied. The Q(a) was evaluated by the Diascan ionic dialysance (Q(a-id)) method and by the ultrasound dilution technique (Q(a-us); Transonic) during the same dialysis session. The measurements were available for 23 patients. In addition, the patients had ultrasonography of their fistula followed by angiography, if a stenosis was detected. RESULTS: Q(a-id) and Q(a-us) were not significantly different, showing a difference in Q(a) at 32 +/- 469 ml/min. Q(a-id) was significantly different between patients with or without stenosis (508 +/- 241 vs. 1,125 +/- 652 ml/min, p < 0.05). Among patients with a Q(a) <500 ml/min by Q(a-id), 5 had a stenosis detected by ultrasonography (sensitivity 83%), and 3 had no stenosis (false-positive rate 18%). Of these 3 patients, 2 had a thrombotic event at 1 and 3 months, suggesting that a more sensitive detection of stenosis for this range of Q(a) is needed and that a Q(a) <500 ml/min has a higher power to predict thromboses than a stenosis by ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of the access flow rate by the Q(a-id) method has a clinical relevance to the detection of vascular access stenosis. An intervention program based on the Q(a-id) has to be evaluated.