Clot structure and fibrinolytic potential in patients with post thrombotic syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a chronic sequel of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The clot structure and fibrinolytic potential in PTS is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: To assess the fibrinolytic potential and clot structure in patients with PTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a history of DVT were included in a case-control study: patients with PTS (cases n=30) and without PTS (controls n=30), and 30 apparently healthy individuals (HI) without venous thromboembolism (VTE) or venous insufficiency were enrolled. Fibrinolysis and clot structure were assessed by turbidimetric assays, permeation, and confocal microscopy. Fibrinogen was measured by Clauss and fibrinogen γ' by ELISA. RESULTS: We observed a significant trend of decreasing maximum turbidity from HI (median 0.52 [IQR 0.46-0.62]), to controls (0.49 [IQR 0.41-0.55]), to cases (0.46 [IQR 0.39-0.49]) p=0.020. Fibrinogen was lower in patients (cases and controls) (3.69g/L [IQR 3.31-4.26]) compared to HI (4.17 [IQR 3.69-4.65]) p=0.041. Patients with recurrent VTE had lower maximum turbidity and lower permeation than patients with one episode of VTE; (0.31 [IQR 0.25-0.39] versus 0.38 [IQR 0.34-0.44] p=0.008) and (6.0×10(-9)/cm(2) [IQR 5.1-7.9] versus 7.7×10(-9)/cm(2) [IQR 6.0-10.0] p=0.047) respectively, at equal fibrinogen levels. There were no differences in lysis time, confocal microscopy, or fibrinogen γ'. CONCLUSIONS: Lower maximum turbidity, indicating a tendency towards thinner fibres and denser clots, was found in patients with PTS as well as in patients with recurrent VTE. Fibrinogen levels did not explain these differences in clot structure. The abnormal clot structure may contribute to the increased thrombotic risk profile in patients with PTS.

Eliciting patients' preferences for elastic compression stocking therapy after deep vein thrombosis: potential for improving compliance.

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is used to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). We aimed to elicit patient preferences regarding ECS therapy after deep vein thrombosis. The most valued attributes were PTS risk reduction and the ability to put on the ECS independently. Heterogeneous results with respect to education level stress the importance of proper counselling. BACKGROUND: Elastic compression stocking (ECS) therapy is used for prevention of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) after deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Current evidence on its effectiveness is conflicting. Compliance, a major determinant of the effectiveness of ECS therapy, remained largely ignored in former studies. OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into preferences regarding ECS therapy in patients after DVT. PATIENTS/METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted 3 months after DVT in patients enrolled in the IDEAL DVT study, a randomized controlled trial comparing 2 years of ECS therapy with individually tailored duration of ECS therapy for the prevention of PTS. Nine unlabeled, forced-choice sets of two hypothetical types of ECS were presented to each patient. Data were analyzed with multinomial logit models. RESULTS: The respondent sample consisted of 81% (300/369) of invited patients. The most important determinants of preference were PTS risk reduction and putting on the ECS. Patients were willing to increase the duration of therapy by 1 year if this increases the PTS risk reduction with 10%. Patients accepted an increase in the risk of PTS of 29% if they were able to put on the ECS themselves. Preferences were heterogeneous with respect to education level. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of the risk of PTS and the ability to put on the ECS without help are the most important characteristics of ECS therapy. Physicians should pay considerable attention to patient education regarding PTS. In addition, patients should be supported in their ability to put on and take off the ECS independently. These rather simple interventions could improve compliance.

Sample Size Estimation for Non-Inferiority Trials: Frequentist Approach versus Decision Theory Approach.

BACKGROUND: Non-inferiority trials are performed when the main therapeutic effect of the new therapy is expected to be not unacceptably worse than that of the standard therapy, and the new therapy is expected to have advantages over the standard therapy in costs or other (health) consequences. These advantages however are not included in the classic frequentist approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. In contrast, the decision theory approach of sample size calculation does include these factors. The objective of this study is to compare the conceptual and practical aspects of the frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials, thereby demonstrating that the decision theory approach is more appropriate for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials. METHODS: The frequentist approach and decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials are compared and applied to a case of a non-inferiority trial on individually tailored duration of elastic compression stocking therapy compared to two years elastic compression stocking therapy for the prevention of post thrombotic syndrome after deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: The two approaches differ substantially in conceptual background, analytical approach, and input requirements. The sample size calculated according to the frequentist approach yielded 788 patients, using a power of 80% and a one-sided significance level of 5%. The decision theory approach indicated that the optimal sample size was 500 patients, with a net value of €92 million. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates and explains the differences between the classic frequentist approach and the decision theory approach of sample size calculation for non-inferiority trials. We argue that the decision theory approach of sample size estimation is most suitable for sample size calculation of non-inferiority trials.

Biomarkers for post thrombotic syndrome: a case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: There is limited knowledge on the etiology of post thrombotic syndrome (PTS), although several mechanisms have been proposed. The objectives are to explore the role of different pathogenic mechanisms for PTS, through measurement of an elaborate panel of biomarkers in patients with and without PTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with PTS (cases) and without PTS after minimal 2years follow-up (controls), were selected from the outpatient clinic of two Dutch hospitals. As a reference to the normal population healthy individuals (HI) without a history of venous thromboembolism were invited to participate. The population consisted of: 26 cases, 27 controls, and 26 HI. A panel of predefined biomarkers was measured in venous blood. RESULTS: D-dimer showed a decreasing trend from cases to controls to HI; p=0.010. Thrombin/antithrombin complex levels were significantly higher in cases than in controls; p=0.032, and HI; p=0.017. APC-ratio was significantly lower in cases compared to controls; p=0.032, and HI; p=0.011. A significant trend of increasing proTAFI from cases, to controls, and HI; p=0.002 was found. There were no differences in inflammatory markers (CRP, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-8). Thrombomodulin, tissue-plasminogen activator, and von Willebrand factor were higher in patients compared to HI. There was a significant trend of decreasing sVCAM, from cases, to controls, and HI; p=0.029. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PTS displayed increased coagulation activity, an altered pattern of fibrinolytic marker expression, and increased endothelial activation. We found no evidence of systemic inflammation in patients with PTS at 63months since the last DVT.

Markers of coagulation, fibrinolysis and inflammation in relation to post-thrombotic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurs in 20-50% of patients after a deep venous thrombosis (DVT). It is difficult to accurately predict which patients will develop PTS. Biomarkers could be a valuable tool for PTS risk assessment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether increased levels of factor (F)VIII, C-reactive protein (CRP) or D-dimer, over time, are associated with the development of PTS in patients after an acute DVT. METHODS: PTS status was assessed using the Villalta scale. Blood sampling was performed at three points during follow-up. RESULTS: A cohort of 228 consecutive patients was included after an acute DVT. At T1 (12 months after index DVT), both levels of D-dimer (median 725 ng mL(-1) [interquartile range, IQR 400-1400[ vs. 378 ng mL(-1) [251-652] P=0.004) and CRP (median 3.9 mg L(-1) [IQR 1.6-8.5] vs. 2.4 mg L(-1) [1.0-4.3] P=0.018) were increased in patients with PTS, compared with patients without PTS. Factor (F)VIII was not associated with PTS. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, varicosities (odds ratio [OR] 13.4 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-59.1 P=0.001), a previous ipsilateral DVT (OR 6.3 95% CI 1.5-26.9 P=0.012) and CRP>5 mg L(-1) on T1 (OR 8.0 95% CI 2.4-26.4 P=0.001) were significantly associated with PTS. CONCLUSIONS: Besides previous ipsilateral DVT and varicosities, CRP>5 mg L(-1) at T1 was strongly and independently associated with PTS. Persistent inflammation rather than hypercoagulability might be the most important etiological factor in PTS, and may be a target for future therapy. The development of a risk score for PTS, including both clinical risk factors and biomarker levels, such as CRP, might be desirable.