Evaluation of collected outcome measures in axial spondyloarthritis in daily-care rheumatology settings: the experience of the RHEVER network.

OBJECTIVES: Nowadays, the recommended measures for optimal monitoring of axial Spondyloarthritis (ax-SpA) disease activity are either BASDAI and CRP, or ASDAS-CRP. However, there could be a gap between recommendations and daily practice. We aimed to determine the measures collected by rheumatologists in an ax-SpA follow-up visit, and to determine the impact of a meeting (where rheumatologists reached a consensus on the measures to be collected) on the collection of such measures. METHODS: A consensual meeting of a local network of 32 rheumatologists proposed, four months later, to report at least the BASDAI score in the medical file of every ax-SpA patient at every follow-up visit. An independent investigator reviewed the medical files of 10 consecutive patients per rheumatologist, seen twice during the year (e.g. before and after the meeting). The most frequently collected measures were assessed, and then, the frequency of collection before and after the meeting was compared. RESULTS: A total of 456 medical files from 228 patients were reviewed. Treatment (>60%), CRP (51.3%) and total BASDAI (28.5%) were the most reported measures in medical files. Before/After the meeting, the frequencies of collected measures in medical files were 28.5%/51.7%, 51.3%/52.2%, 16.7%/31.6% and 0.9%/6.1% for BASDAI, CRP, BASDAI + CRP and ASDAS, respectively reaching a statistically significance for BASDAI, ASDAS and BASDAI+CRP (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a low rate of systematic report of the recommended outcome measures in ax-SpA. However, it suggests that a consensual meeting involving practicing rheumatologists might be relevant to improve the implementation of such recommendations.

Challenges of cardiovascular risk assessment in the routine rheumatology outpatient setting: an observational study of 110 rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: An annual assessment of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is recommended, but its practical modalities have not been determined. The objective was to assess the feasibility and usefulness of a standardized CV risk assessment in RA, performed by rheumatologists during outpatient clinics. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design within a network of rheumatologists. Each rheumatologist included 5 consecutive unselected patients with definite RA. Data collection included standardized assessment of CV risk factors: blood pressure, interpretation of glycemia and of lipid levels, and calculation of the Framingham CV risk score. Outcome criteria included feasibility (missing data and time taken to assess the patients) and usefulness (the CV risk assessment was considered useful if at least 1 modifiable and previously unknown CV risk factor was evidenced). RESULTS: Twenty-two rheumatologists (77% in office-based practice) assessed 110 RA patients. The mean ± SD age was 57 ± 10 years, and the mean ± SD RA duration was 11 ± 9 years; 50 patients (45%) were treated with biologic agents, and 76% were women. Regarding feasibility, missing data were most frequent for glycemia (27% of patients) and cholesterolemia (14% of patients). The mean ± SD duration of the CV risk assessment was 15 ± 5 minutes. The CV risk assessment was considered useful in 33 patients (30%), evidencing dyslipidemia (15% of patients) or high blood pressure (9% of patients) as the most frequently previously unknown CV risk factor. CONCLUSION: The assessment of CV risk factors is feasible, but labor intensive, during an outpatient rheumatology clinic. This assessment identified modifiable CV risk factors in 30% of the patients. These results suggest that RA patients are not sufficiently assessed and treated for CV risk factors.

Cutaneous sarcoidosis occurring during anti-TNF-alpha treatment: report of two cases.

We report two cases of cutaneous granuloma induced by anti-TNF-alpha therapy: a 47-year-old man suffering from psoriatic arthritis treated with infliximab and a 56-year-old woman treated with adalimumab for polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. The biospies confirmed the diagnosis of a 'sarcoidosis-like' reaction. No systemic involvement was observed. Such cases of noninfectious granulomatous diseases occurring during anti-TNF-alpha therapy are becoming increasingly frequent.

Is it possible to identify early predictors of the future cost of chronic arthritis? The VErA project.

This study was conducted to identify early predictors of the total cost of inflammatory arthritis (IA). One hundred and eighty patients affected by undifferentiated arthritis (UA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were included in the French Very Early rheumatoid Arthritis (VErA) cohort between 1998 and 2001. Health economic data for 2003 were collected using a patient self-questionnaire. Results were analysed in terms of direct, indirect and total costs in 2003 euros (2003euro) for the population as a whole and in diagnostic subgroups. A payor perspective (the French National Health Insurance, in this case) was adopted. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify predictors of total cost from among the criteria assessed on recruitment. Results of the study showed that for the study population as a whole, the mean total cost was euro4700 per patient. The costs attributable to the RA and UA sub-groups were euro5928 and euro2424 per patient, respectively. In a univariate analysis, certain parameters were significantly correlated with a higher cost of illness. In the multivariate analysis, some of these parameters were further identified as being predictive of higher cost. Two strong significant, early predictors of total cost were identified: higher pain (P = 0.002) and the presence of rheumatoid factor (P = 0.004). In the RA sub-group, lower grip strength of the dominant hand (P = 0.039) was another predictor of the illness's subsequent economic impact. In conclusion, our data show that simple clinical and laboratory parameters can be used early in the course of IA to predict the condition's impact on healthcare budgets.

Contribution of PTPN22 1858T, TNFRII 196R and HLA-shared epitope alleles with rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies to very early rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the predictive value of TNFRII 196R, PTPN22 1858T and HLA-shared epitope (SE) alleles, RFs and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) for RA diagnosis in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis. METHODS: We followed up 284 patients who had swelling of at least two joints that had persisted for longer than 4 weeks but had been evolving for <6 months. At 2 yrs, patients were classified as having RA or non-RA rheumatic diseases according to the ACR criteria. Patients were genotyped with respect to TNFRII 196M/R and PTPN22 1858C/T polymorphisms and HLA-SE. The presence of IgA, IgG and IgM RF isotypes and ACPA was sought in sera collected at disease onset. RESULTS: HLA-SE alleles alone, concomitant presence of TNFRII 196R and PTPN22 1858T alleles, IgA, IgG and IgM RF alone and ACPA were found to be significantly associated with RA diagnosis. Using logistic regression analysis, the concomitant presence of RF and ACPA at disease onset was the best association to predict RA diagnosis. In patients (n = 34) who did not fulfil the ACR criteria for RA at inclusion but who progressed to ACR positivity, the study of the genetic risk markers did not contribute to predict RA diagnosis at 2 yrs. CONCLUSIONS: PTPN22 1858T, TNFRII 196R and HLA-SE alleles do not improve the predictive value of RF and ACPA for RA diagnosis in our cohort, and do not contribute to an earlier diagnosis in undifferentiated patients initially negative for RF and ACPA.

Professional practice assessment in ambulatory private rheumatology: a pilot evaluation of the medical file content for rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Professional Practice Assessment (PPA) has become an obligation for all physicians in France, however its modalities remain unclear. The objective of this work was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of a PPA for private practice rheumatologists performed in the context of a network. METHODS: A list of items considered mandatory to collect during an outpatient visit for rheumatoid arthritis, was prepared by the network. Non hospital-based rheumatologists, members of the network then evaluated some of their patient files selected by chronological order over a one-month period of time using this list. These files were then assessed by another private rheumatologist, member of the group, randomly allocated, using the same list of items. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the private-practice doctors accepted to participate. The mean time to evaluate 15 patient files was 2 hours. Agreement between auto-evaluation and external evaluation for each file was good (agreement statistic, 0.75-1.0). Items mandatory to collect were collected in a high proportion of cases (84.6%). CONCLUSION: PPA can be performed in the context of a network, auto-evaluation is a valid method and when the list of items is decided on by the network, the data are collected satisfactorily.

Diagnostic and prognostic values of anti glucose-6-phosphate isomerase antibodies in community-recruited patients with very early arthritis.

The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic and prognostic values of antiglucose-6-phosphate isomerase (GPI) antibodies in patients with very early arthritis. Anti-GPI antibodies were measured by ELISA using purified GPI from rabbit muscle in: (i) 383 sera from healthy blood donors (n = 120), well-established rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (n = 99) and non-RA differentiated arthritis (NRADA) (n = 164) patients; (ii) 195 sera obtained from community-recruited patients with very early inflammatory arthritis (VErA cohort) that were studied for 1 year and classified as having RA (n = 116), NRADA (n = 41), and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (n = 38) after the follow-up period. The criterion for severity was the progression of radiographic damage. Prevalence of anti-GPI antibodies was significantly higher in well-established RA patients (45.4%) compared to healthy subjects (2.5%). Anti-GPI antibodies were also present in sera from NRADA: systemic lupus erythematosus 53%, polymyositis 45.4%, adult-onset Still's disease 44%, systemic sclerosis 42.8%, spondylarthropathies 25% and primary Sjögren's syndrome 5.8%. No significant association was found between the presence of anti-GPI antibodies and the 3 diagnostic groups from the VErA cohort. No correlation was observed between anti-GPI and autoantibodies usually associated with RA. Anti-GPI antibodies were not predictive of radiological progression in patients with very early arthritis. Thus, anti-GPI antibodies are not useful for discriminating RA from non-RA rheumatic diseases and do not constitute a predictive factor of structural damage.

How do French rheumatologists treat early rheumatoid arthritis?

Although factors that appear to predict long-term outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis have been identified, there is no consensus about the treatment early in the disease. To determine how French office- and hospital-based rheumatologists treat early rheumatoid arthritis, we created three clinical vignettes corresponding to different levels of severity of early rheumatoid arthritis (less than six months' disease duration). Cases 1 and 2 were relatively young patients (35 and 50 years), and Case 1 had numerous poor prognosis factors. Case 3 was 80 years of age. Rheumatologists were asked to indicate which medications they would use at presentation and after one year of a favorable or unfavorable course. The study was conducted by questionnaire (response rate, 58%). Of the 185 rheumatologists who completed the questionnaire, 81% were male and 19% female; mean age was 42 +/- 8 years. In Cases 1 and 2, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs were given by 99% of respondents; second-line drugs were prescribed at presentation by 93% of respondents in Case 1 and 86% in Case 2, and methotrexate was more likely to be used in the presence of poor prognosis factors (23% in case 1 and 7% in Case 2). In the event of an unfavorable course after one year, a larger proportion of rheumatologists prescribed glucocorticoid therapy (65% in Case 1 and 20% in Case 2), and there was a shift from "conventional" to "modern" second-line drugs, with more widespread use of methotrexate (65% in case 1 and 18% in case 2). In the 80-year-old patient, glucocorticoid therapy was used more often than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and second-line drugs (gold salts, hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine) were prescribed by 40% of rheumatologists at presentation and by 67% after one year of an unfavorable course; in the latter situation, methotrexate was selected in 24% of cases. In contrast to conventional recommendations, many French office- or hospital-based rheumatologists use second-line drugs very early and base their choice of medications on the estimated risk of severe disease and on the age of the patient.

[Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and serum immunoglobulins in rheumatic pelvispondylitis]. / Vitesse de sédimentation globulaire et immunoglobulines sériques au cours de la pelvispondylite rhumatismale.

Blood sedimentation rate and balanced titration of immunoglobulins were studied in 59 patients presenting a ankylosing pelvispondylitis: in 30 of them, these examinations were repeated at an interval of 3-6 months. The sedimentation rate (Sed. rate) and the level of immunoglobulins G and A increased in the course of the disease, but an elective increase of the level of immunoglobulins A was not demonstrated. Neither the Sed. rate, nor the level of IgA are correlated to evolution criteria of the disease; a positive correlation is only found with the platelets number, in a vertical study of 59 patients. Nevertheless, the variations of the immunoglobulins A is positively correlated with alterations of the clinical condition as demonstrated in the longitudinal study carried out in 30 patients. This finding supports physiopathological hypothesis which incriminates microbial intestinal infections at the origin of evolutive bouts of ankylosing pelvispondylitis.

[Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis with salazosulfapyridine. A controlled double-blind study in 60 patients]. / Traitement de la spondylarthrite ankylosante par la salazosulfapyridine. Une étude en double aveugle contrôlée chez 60 malades.

The efficacy of salazosulfapyridine (SI) has been recently reported in the course of peripheral arthritis in ankylosing spondylarthritis (SPA), but is action on the axial forms of the disease was not known. We have therefore conducted a therapeutic trial in 60 patients suffering from SPA, without peripheral involvement clinical sign evoking an enterocolopathy. This double-blind study compared the activity of SI at a dose of 2 g/day with a placebo, for 6 months. Thirteen patients had to discontinue the treatment: 6 in the placebo group (inefficacy: 3 cases, anemia: 1 case, epigastric pain: 1 case, rash: 1 case) and 7 cases in the SI group (inefficacy: 2 cases, nauseous: 3 cases, abdominal pain: 1 case, moderate elevation of transaminases: 1 case). These 13 patients were kept for the global analysis and considered as therapeutic failures. The treatment was considered effective in 15 out of 30 patients of group SI and in 30 patients on placebo (p less than 0.02). In addition, in group SI, a statistically significant decrease of the daily dose of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs was observed (-6.5 +/- 7.2 versus -2.4 +/- 6.4 in the placebo group, p less than 0.05); also was observed a decrease of the functional index (-5.9 +/- 6.6 versus -1.9 +/- 5.7 in the group placebo, p less than 0.05) and of the serum level of immunoglobulin G (-1.8 +/- 3.6 g/l versus +0.8 +/- 2.9 in the placebo group, p less than 0.025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Sulphasalazine in ankylosing spondylitis: a double blind controlled study in 60 patients.

Sulphasalazine has been reported to be effective in ankylosing spondylitis with peripheral arthritis, but its efficacy in spondylitis is unknown. Thus 60 patients with active ankylosing spondylitis without peripheral arthritis or gastrointestinal symptoms were randomly allocated to one of two therapeutic groups. One group received 2 g sulphasalazine daily for six months and the other a placebo. Thirteen patients (six given placebo and seven given sulphasalazine) dropped out of the trial and were considered to be treatment failures. After six months' follow up efficacy was rated as good or very good by 15 of the 30 patients given sulphasalazine and by only six of the 30 given placebo (p less than 0.02). Furthermore, in the patients given sulphasalazine the daily consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, functional index, and plasma IgG concentrations had fallen significantly. These data suggest that sulphasalazine may be a safe and effective treatment for spondylitis in ankylosing spondylitis.

[Diagnostic and prognostic values of vacuolated polymorphonuclear neutrophils (author's transl)]. / Polynucléaires neutrophiles vacuolés. Valeurs diagnostique et pronostique.

The presence of vacuolated polymorphonuclear neutrophils in blood smears of patients suffering from infection appears to be associated with massive bacterial growth and to constitute a very early symptom of rapidly life-threatening septicaemia. When these cells persist for more than 36 hours, the disease may be considered as beyond control.